Primer articlesNature Reviews publishes timely, authoritative articles that are of broad interest and exceptional quality. Thank you for taking the time to help us to ensure that our articles meet these high standards.Primer articles in Nature Reviews provide an overview of a disease or disorder. Primers are intended to provide an authoritative, global perspective for the benefit of biomedical scientists, putting current clinical and translational challenges into context. These overview articles are meant to be introductory and cover all aspects from epidemiology to disease mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment.Please submit your report in narrative form and provide detailed justifications for all statements. Confidential comments to the editor are welcome, but it is helpful if the main points are stated in the comments for transmission to the authors.Please note that all Primer articles follow the same set organization of the main headings. Additionally, Nature Reviews articles will be thoroughly edited before publication and all figures will be redrawn by our in-house art editors. We therefore request that you concentrate on the scientific content of the article and display items, rather than the 'order' of the content or any minor errors in language or grammar that might be present in the draft version. Please consider and comment on the following points when reviewing this manuscript:• Is the article written for a broad audience, including biomedical scientists, translational researchers, medical students and clinicians?• Is the global perspective well represented?• Does the article present the current state of the art in the disease, without much emphasis on historical aspects?• Are the open research questions outlines and comprehensive?• Does the length of the article seem appropriate?• Are the ideas logically presented and discussed?• Does the article provide a balanced overview of the literature? Please bear in mind that it may not be possible to cover all aspects of a field within such a concise article.• Is the discussion fair and accurate? Although our authors are encouraged to be opinionated, they should not ignore alternative points of view. • Do the figures, boxes and tables provide clear and accurate information? Are there any additional or alternative display items that you think that the authors should include?• Are the references appropriate and up-to-date? Do they reflect the scope of the article?• Are you aware of any undeclared conflicts of interest that might affect the balance, or perceived balance, of the article?

We found insufficient evidence to recommend the use of acupuncture for people with depression. The results are limited by the high risk of bias in the majority of trials meeting inclusion criteria.

No abstract

Although body size and shape misperception (BSSM) is a common feature of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and muscle dysmorphia, little is known about its underlying neural mechanisms. Recently, a new approach has emerged, based on the long-established non-invasive technique of perceptual adaptation, which allows for inferences about the structure of the neural apparatus responsible for alterations in visual appearance. Here, we describe several recent experimental examples of BSSM, wherein exposure to “extreme” body stimuli causes visual aftereffects of biased perception. The implications of these studies for our understanding of the neural and cognitive representation of human bodies, along with their implications for clinical practice are discussed.

ObjectiveMost weight loss research focuses on weight as the primary outcome, often to the exclusion of other physiological or psychological measures. This study aims to provide a holistic evaluation of the effects from weight loss interventions for individuals with obesity by examining the physiological, psychological and eating disorders outcomes from these interventions.MethodsDatabases Medline, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library (2011–2016) were searched for randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews of obesity treatments (dietary, exercise, behavioural, psychological, pharmacological or surgical). Data extracted included study features, risk of bias, study outcomes, and an assessment of treatment impacts on physical, psychological or eating disorder outcomes.ResultsFrom 3628 novel records, 134 studies met all inclusion criteria and were evaluated in this review. Lifestyle interventions had the strongest evidence base as a first-line approach, with escalation to pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery in more severe or complicated cases. Quality of life was the most common psychological outcome measure, and improved in all cases where it was assessed, across all intervention types. Behavioural, psychological and lifestyle interventions for weight loss led to improvements in cognitive restraint, control over eating and binge eating, while bariatric surgery led to improvements in eating behaviour and body image that were not sustained over the long-term.DiscussionNumerous treatment strategies have been trialled to assist people to lose weight and many of these are effective over the short-term. Quality of life, and to a lesser degree depression, anxiety and psychosocial function, often improve alongside weight loss. Weight loss is also associated with improvements in eating disorder psychopathology and related measures, although overall, eating disorder outcomes are rarely assessed. Further research and between-sector collaboration is required to address the significant overlap in risk factors, diagnoses and treatment outcomes between obesity and eating disorders.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40337-017-0143-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

No abstract

Eating disorders are increasingly recognized as a problem for men but help-seeking is low and little is known about their treatment experiences. This paper sought to determine the treatment experiences of men who have suffered from an eating disorder using autobiographical data. Inclusion criteria were autobiographies of men who had experienced an eating disorder and sought any form of treatment for this, written in the English language, published between 1995 and 2015, and available for purchase in 2016. The search resulted in six books that were thematically analyzed. Analysis of data resulted in two broad themes (1. Positive experiences; 2. Negative experiences) with sub-themes. With regards to the first theme, factors such as concern of staff members, therapist’s expertise (in treating eating disorders in men), and a collaborative treatment approach were considered favorable for treatment. In contrast to the first theme, apathy of staff members, the authors’ own negative preconceptions, treatment providers being perceived as prioritizing financial concerns, perceived as incompetent and judgmental behavior of therapist(s), and time limitations of sessions were considered unfavorable treatment experiences. In this study, the perceived success of treatment depended on therapist’s features and the form of treatment provided. Further research examining these is indicated.