No abstract

No abstract

A simplified predictive model with similar accuracy to a more complex model for predicting independent walking was created, which improves utility in a clinical setting. Such models will allow clinicians to better predict the prognosis of ambulation in individuals who have sustained a traumatic SCI.

Two Risser grading systems coexist, and the agreement between them is moderate. No Risser stage was found to be a good clinical landmark for the beginning of the curve acceleration phase of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A new group, Risser 0 with closed triradiate cartilage and Risser 1, was the best predictor of the beginning of the curve acceleration phase. This new system is easy to implement and is based on findings that are available on spine radiographs. It should be used at the first visit and for scoliosis follow-up to assess skeletal maturity and correlation with the curve acceleration phase.

No abstract

No abstract

This retrospective study assessed the results of 71 patients with knee dislocations who underwent acute combined repair and reconstruction using Ligament Advancement Reinforcement System (LARS) artificial ligaments between June 1996 and May 2008 with a follow-up between two and eight years. The outcome measures used were the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee form (IKDC 2000), the Tegner activity level score, the Meyers ratings, Telos stress radiography, range of motion and clinical knee stability testing. When comparing high-versus low-energy dislocations and knee dislocation (KD) II/III versus KD IV injuries, a better Lysholm score for the knee dislocation (KD) II/III group was found compared with the KD IV group. The subjective and objective findings from our study are satisfactory and comparable with the results of other studies of knee dislocations. Our findings suggest that with a mean follow-up of 54 months, acute combined repair and reconstruction with LARS ligaments is a valid alternative for treating knee dislocations.

Background Physicians have consistently shown poor adverse-event reporting practices in the literature and yet they have the clinical acumen to properly stratify and appraise these events.