Th e P011er hyp oth esis asserts that polluting firms ca n benefit from env iro nme nta l policies, arguing that well-d esign ed envi ro nme nta l reg ulati ons stimulate innovati on. This is ac hieve d by increasing either productivit y or product va lue w hich lead s to pri vat e ben efits. As a conse que nce, env ironme ntal regulations would ben efit both soc iety and regulated firms. Thi s point of view has found a receptive audie nce am ong poli cy mak ers and the popular pr ess but has been severe ly criti cized by economis ts. In this paper, we pr esen t some of the argume nts in th is debate and review the empir ical ev ide nce avai lab le so far in the ec onomic literature.
This note shows that, by reducing agency costs, an environmental regulation may enhance pollution-reducing innovation while at the same time increasing firms'private benefit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.