Objectives: Toxic serum cefepime trough concentrations are not well defined in the current literature. We aimed to define a more precise plasma trough concentration threshold for this antibiotic's neurological toxicity and to identify individuals at risk for developing neurotoxic side effects. Methods: Retrospective study including all individuals who underwent cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) between 2013 and 2017. Individuals with cefepime concentrations other than trough were excluded. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence of neurotoxicity and its relationship with cefepime plasma trough concentrations. Secondary outcomes were the relationship of renal function, cefepime daily dose, age, and cerebral and general co-morbidities with the occurrence of neurotoxicity. We also compared the mortality rate during hospitalization in individuals with and without neurotoxicity, and the possible impact of neuroprotective co-medications on outcomes. Results: Cefepime concentrations were determined in 584 individuals. Among 319 individuals with available trough concentrations included, the overall incidence of neurotoxicity was 23.2% (74 of 319 individuals). Higher cefepime plasma trough concentrations were significantly associated with risk of neurotoxicity (no neurotoxicity 6.3 mg/L (interquartile range (IQR) 4.1e8.6) versus with neurotoxicity 21.6 mg/L (IQR 17.0e28.6), p <0.001). Individuals with presumed cefepime neurotoxicity had a significantly lower renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate 82.0 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (IQR 45.0e105.0) versus 35.0 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (IQR 23.3e53.3], p <0.001), and significantly higher in-hospital mortality (19 (7.8%) versus 26 (35.1%) individuals, p <0.001). No neurotoxic side effects were seen below a trough concentration of 7.7 mg/L. Levels 38.1 mg/L always led to neurological side effects. Conclusion: In individuals with risk factors for cefepime neurotoxicity, such as renal insufficiency, TDM should be systematically performed, aiming at trough concentrations <7.5 mg/L.

Background Laboratory tests are a mainstay in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, and high hopes are placed on rapid antigen tests. However, the accuracy of rapid antigen tests in real-life clinical settings is unclear because adequately designed diagnostic accuracy studies are essentially lacking. Objectives We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid antigen test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/ secondary care testing facility. Methods Consecutive individuals presented at a COVID-19 testing facility affiliated to a Swiss University Hospital were recruited (n=1’465%). Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, and the Roche/ SD Biosensor rapid antigen test was conducted in-parallel with two real-time PCR (reference standard). Results Among 1’465 patients recruited, RT-PCR was positive in 141 individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of prevalence 9.6%. The Roche/ SD Biosensor rapid antigen test was positive in 94 patients (6.4%), and negative in 1’368 individuals (93.4%). The overall sensitivity of the rapid antigen test was 65.3% (95% confidence interval, CI, 56.8, 73.1), the specificity was 99.9% (95%CI 99.5, 100.0). In asymptomatic individuals, the sensitivity was 44.0% (95%CI 24.4, 65.1). Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 Roche/SD Biosensor rapid antigen test to diagnose a SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/ secondary care testing facility was considerably lower compared to manufacturers’ data. Widespread application in this setting might lead to a considerable number of individuals falsely classified as SARS-CoV-2 negative.

Objective: Rapid and early detection of patients at risk to develop sepsis remains demanding. Heparin-binding protein (HBP) has previously demonstrated good prognostic properties in detecting organ dysfunction among patients with suspected infections. This study aimed to evaluate the plasma levels of HBP as a prognostic biomarker for infection-induced organ dysfunction among patients seeking medical attention at the emergency department. Design: Prospective, international multicenter, convenience sample study. Setting: Four general emergency departments at academic centers in Sweden, Switzerland, and Canada. Patients: All emergency encounters among adults where one of the following criteria were fulfilled: respiratory rate >25 breaths per minute; heart rate >120 beats per minute; altered mental status; systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg; oxygen saturation <90% without oxygen; oxygen saturation <93% with oxygen; reported oxygen saturation <90%. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 524 emergency department patients were prospectively enrolled, of these 236 (45%) were eventually adjudicated to have a noninfectious disease. Three hundred forty-seven patients (66%) had or developed organ dysfunction within 72 h, 54 patients (10%) were admitted to an intensive care unit, and 23 patients (4%) died within 72 h. For the primary outcome, detection of infected-related organ dysfunction within 72 h, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for HBP was 0.73 (95% CI 0.68–0.78) among all patients and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76–0.87) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or no infection. Against the secondary outcome, infection leading to admittance to the ICU, death or a persistent high SOFA-score due to an infection (SOFA-score ≥5 at 12–24 h) HBP had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95) among all patients and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77–0.99) among patients confidently adjudicated to either infection or noninfection. Conclusions: Among patients at the emergency department, HBP demonstrated good prognostic and discriminatory properties in detecting the most severely ill patients with infection.