No abstract

An avulsion of the tibial insertion of the meniscus or a radial tear close to the meniscal insertion is defined as a root tear. In clinical practice, the incidence of these lesions is often underestimated. However, several biomechanical studies have shown that the effect of a root tear is comparable to a total meniscectomy. Clinical studies documented progredient arthritic changes following root tears, thereby supporting basic science studies. The clinical diagnosis is limited by unspecific symptoms. In addition to the diagnostic arthroscopy, MRI is considered to be the gold standard of diagnosis of a meniscal root tear. Three different direct MRI signs for the diagnosis of a meniscus root tear have been described: Radial linear defect in the axial plane, vertical linear defect (truncation sign) in the coronal plane, and the so-called ghost meniscus sign in the sagittal plane. Meniscal extrusion is also considered to be an indirect sign of a root tear, but is less common in lateral root tears. During arthroscopy, the function of the meniscus root must be assessed by probing. However, visualization of the meniscal insertions is challenging. Refixation of the meniscal root can be performed using a transtibial pull-out suture, suture anchors, or side-to-side repair. Several short-term studies reported good clinical results after medial or lateral root repair. Nevertheless, MRI and second-look arthroscopy revealed high rates of incomplete or absent healing, especially for medial root tears. To date, most studies are case series with short-term follow-up and level IV evidence. Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 chondral lesions and varus malalignment of >5° were found to predict an inferior clinical outcome after medial meniscus root repair. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term results and to define evident criteria for meniscal root repair.

IV.

No abstract

Purpose To perform a detailed deformity analysis of patients with varus alignment and to define the ideal osteotomy level (tibial vs. femoral vs. double level) to avoid an oblique joint line. Methods A total of 303 digital full-leg standing radiographs of patients aged 18-60 years and varus alignment [mechanical tibiofemoral varus angle (mFTA) ≥ 3°] were included. All legs were analyzed regarding mFTA, mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA), mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), and joint line convergence angle. Based on mFTA, varus alignment was categorized as "mild" (3°-5°), "moderate" (6°-8°), or "severe" (≥ 9°). Deformity location was determined according to the malalignment test described by Paley. Two osteotomy simulations were performed with different upper limits for mMPTA: anatomic correction (mMPTA ≤ 90°, mLDFA ≥ 85°) and overcorrection (mMPTA ≤ 95°, mLDFA ≥ 85°). If a single osteotomy exceeded these limits at the intended mFTA of 2° valgus, a double-level osteotomy was simulated. If even a double-level osteotomy resulted in deviations from the defined limits, the leg was categorized as "uncorrectable". Results Mean mFTA was 6° ± 11° of varus (range 3°-15°). A tibial deformity was observed in 28%, a femoral deformity in 23%, a combined tibial and femoral deformity in 4%, and no bony deformity in 45%. The prevalence of a tibial deformity did not differ between varus severity groups, whereas a femoral and bifocal deformity was significantly more prevalent in knees with more distinct varus (p < 0.001). Osteotomy simulation revealed that isolated high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was appropriate in only 12% for anatomic correction, whereas a double-level osteotomy was necessary in 63%. If overcorrection of mMPTA was tolerated, the number of HTOs significantly increased to 57% (p < 0.001), whereas the number of doublelevel osteotomies significantly decreased to 33% (p < 0.001). Isolated DFO was considered ideal in 8% for both simulations. Significantly more knees were considered "uncorrectable" by simulating anatomic correction (18 vs. 2%; p < 0.001). A double-level osteotomy was significantly more often necessary in knees with "severe" varus (p < 0.001). Conclusion Less than one-third of patients (28%) with mechanical varus ≥ 3° have a tibial deformity. If anatomic correction (mMPTA ≤ 90°) is intended, only 12% of patients can be corrected via isolated HTO, whereas 63% of patients require a double-level osteotomy. If slight overcorrection is accepted (mMPTA ≤ 95°), 57% of patients can be corrected via isolated HTO, whereas 33% of patients would still require a double-level osteotomy. Level of evidence III, cross-sectional study.

Posterior lateral meniscus root tear might have a better prognosis in terms of the development of osteoarthritis when the meniscofemoral ligament is intact.

According to our observation in ACL reconstruction, we find root tears of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus as a common concomitant injury in ACL-deficient knees. This might be a consequence of initial trauma or of the increased anterior-posterior translation of the tibia and an overload impact on the posterior meniscus root in ACL-deficient knees. A tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus causes a 25% increase in peak pressure in the medial compartment compared with that found in the intact condition. The repair restores the peak contact pressure to normal (Allaire et al. in J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):1922-1931, [2008]). A tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus might have similar consequences. We hypothesize the surgical anatomical reattachment of the root at the tibia helping to restore knee joint kinematics and helping to advance ACL-graft function. This article presents an arthroscopical technique to reattach the posterior meniscus root in combination with ACL double-bundle reconstruction. The procedure uses the tibial PL tunnel to fix the meniscus suture.

III.