Surgical site infections (SSI) are undesired and troublesome complications after spinal surgery. The reported infection rates range from 0.7 to 11.9%, depending on the diagnosis and the complexity of the procedure. Besides operative factors, patient characteristics could also account for increased infection rates. Because the medical, economic and social costs of SSI are enormous, any significant reduction in risks will pay dividends. The purpose of this study is to compare patients who developed deep SSI following lumbar or thoracolumbar spinal fusion with a randomly selected group of patients who did not develop this complication in order to identify changeable risk factors. With a case-control analysis nested in a historical cohort of patients who had had a spinal fusion between January 1999 and December 2008, we identified 36 cases with deep SSI (CDC criteria). Information regarding patient-level and surgical-level risk factors was derived from standardized but routinely recorded data and compared with those acquired in a random selection of 135 uninfected patients. Univariate analyses and a multivariate logistic regression were performed. The overall rate of infection in 1,615 procedures (1,568 patients) was 2.2%. A positive history of spinal surgery was associated with an almost four times higher infection rate (OR = 3.7, 95% BI = 1.6-8.6). The risk of SSI increased with the number of levels fused, patients with diabetes had an almost six times higher risk and smokers had more than a two times higher risk for deep SSI. The most common organism cultured was Staphylococcus aureus. All infected patients underwent at least one reoperation, including an open débridement and received appropriate antibiotics to treat the organism. Patients who had had a previous spinal surgery are a high-risk group for infection compared with those that never had surgery. Total costs associated with preventive measures are substantial and should be compensated by health care insurance companies by means of separate clinical pathways. High-risk patients should be informed about the increased risk of complications.

PurposeCognitive behavioral interventions are recommended as non-invasive treatment options for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, most treatment effects are small and short-lived. Although a 2-week intensive pain management program for patients with CLBP seems to be effective, the long-term results are not known. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the stability of the 2-year follow-up results and whether this is reflected in the use of health-care services.MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed. Pre-treatment characteristics of patients and data of outcomes obtained at 1-year follow-up were used. At 2-year follow-up a structured interview was conducted following the principles of a post-marketing survey. Outcomes included daily functioning, quality of life, current intensity of pain, disturbance of pain during daily activities, and indicators of the use of pain medication and health-care services.ResultsOf the 90 eligible patients 85 (94%) participated in the post-marketing survey. The 1-year clinical relevant effects are maintained at 2-year follow-up. Effect sizes for functioning and quality of life were large. More than 65% reached preset minimal clinically important differences. At pre-treatment all patients consulted their general practitioner (GP) and medical specialist (MS). At 2-year follow-up 73% reported having consulted neither a GP nor an MS during the previous year. Most of the patients indicated not to use any pain medication (57%) and the percentage patients using opioids have decreased (14%). Moreover, 81% reported to be at work.ConclusionsThe gained results from selected and motivated patients with longstanding CLBP at 1-year follow-up are stable at 2-year follow-up. Above all, most of the participants are at work and results indicate that the use of both pain medication and health care have decreased substantially.

Low back pain (LBP)

In patients with a short onset of neurologic impairment because of compression of the spinal cord or caudal fibers, an intraoperative recovery of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can indicate an improvement of motor function postoperatively. Therefore, transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can be considered as a useful tool to the surgeon to monitor the quality of decompression of the spinal cord.