The safety and efficacy of the thrombolytic agent tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) in the elimination of subarachnoid clot and prevention of chronic vasospasm were evaluated in a blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Twenty-four monkeys were randomly assigned to one of two groups of 12. Each group underwent baseline cerebral angiography and coagulation analysis followed by right-sided craniectomy and experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). An Ommaya reservoir was inserted with its catheter placed into the subarachnoid space. Twenty-four hours later one group (the tPA group) received 0.5 mg of tPA in 0.5 ml of buffer injected into the reservoir every 8 hours for three doses, while the second group (the placebo group) received the same volume of normal saline. On Day 7, angiography was repeated and the animals were sacrificed. One animal from the placebo group developed a delayed ischemic neurological deficit on Day 5 after SAH. Moderate to severe vasospasm (greater than 30% reduction in vessel caliber) was present on Day 7 in the internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries of the animals in the placebo group (p less than 0.01), while in the tPA group only mild narrowing of the anterior cerebral artery was seen. No significant change in coagulation status occurred in either group. All animals in the placebo group had a large amount of subarachnoid clot remaining at the time of sacrifice, but 11 of the 12 animals in the tPA group were completely free of clot. The results of electron microscopic studies of the cerebral arteries correlated with angiography, and there was no histological evidence of brain inflammation associated with the intrathecal use of tPA.

ABSTRACT:Twenty patients with chronically progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) were randomised in a double-blind controlled study to assess the efficacy of plasma exchange therapy. All patients were immunosuppressed with prednisone and azathioprine and underwent either plasma exchange or sham apheresis. The 10 patients in each group were similar in age, sex, duration of disease and degree of disability. Clinical and laboratory responses were assessed immediately following the course of exchange or sham therapy, and 3 to 6 months later, by individuals blinded to the type of therapy administered. Although modest improvement was suggested on clinical examination in 7 of 10 patients exchanged and 3 of the 10 sham treated group, this was transient and was not accompanied by any change in disability status scores. No differences in abnormal laboratory investigations were demonstrable between the two patient groups following therapy. We conclude that plasma exchange therapy using this protocol is unlikely to be of clinical benefit as an adjunct in the management of chronically progressive M.S.

To learn whether the removal of immune complexes from the circulation by plasma exchange could effect an improvement in disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, we performed a controlled study of 20 patients with severe progressive disease which had not responded to previous therapy. Ten patients (Group 1) were hospitalized, continued on their regular antiinflammatory medication, and given a graded course of physiotherapy. A further 10 patients (Group 2) received the same treatment as the first group with the addition of a concurrent course of plasmapheresis. Clinical measurement of disease activity after treatment revealed little difference between the two groups with a statistically significant improvement in four measures in Group 1 and in five in Group 2. Laboratory studies suggested that the intensity of plasma exchange was sufficient to remove circulating immune complexes in these patients. Our results confirm that hospitalization in itself is of benefit in the treatment of acute exacerbations of rheumatoid arthritis. The marginal improvement achieved by the addition of plasma exchange in the management of these patients (despite the removal of circulating immune complexes) makes its short‐term use of questionable value in the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Reticulocyte counting using flow cytometry and a membrane-permeable fluorescent dye, thiazole orange, was evaluated as an alternative to the conventional manual method. The flow cytometric method was more precise (mean c.v. of 4.3%) than the imprecise manual technique (mean c.v. of 22.4%). Linearity was highly acceptable (r = 0.99) over the reticulocyte count range of 1.8-30.1%. Flow cytometry allows processing of large numbers of samples with reduction in technologist time, and the improved precision and tenfold increase in the number of cells counted should considerably improve the clinical utility of the reticulocyte count.

Summary Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a recognized complication of heparin administration. Early detection of this syndrome is essential in the prevention of immune‐mediated thromboembolic sequelae. The 14C‐sero‐tonin release assay (SRA) has been used in reference laboratories to identify sera from patients on heparin therapy capable of inducing platelet dense granule release. In an attempt to improve existing methodologies, we employed luminographic detection of platelet‐dense granule ATP release as an endpoint of HIT antibody‐mediated platelet activation. Sera tested included 10 SRA confirmed positive and five SRA confirmed negative samples (to establish the assay), five samples from patients with thrombocytopenia not on heparin therapy and 34 patients suspected of HIT syndrome. All SRA confirmed positive sera (n= 19) were positive by the luminographic procedure. 24/26 SRA confirmed negative sera and five sera from thrombocytopenic patients not on heparin therapy were negative using luminography. Two of four sera yielding equivocal SRA results were found to be positive by the luminographic technique. The data suggest that the use of a lumi‐aggregometer in the coagulation laboratory to detect HIT antibody‐induced platelet activation is a reliable alternative to the SRA. The luminographic procedure is both rapid and sensitive, and does not require the use of biohazardous radio‐isotopes.