A nonlinear singularity-preserving solution to seismic image recovery with sparseness and continuity constraints is proposed. We observe that curvelets, as a directional frame expansion, lead to sparsity of seismic images and exhibit invariance under the normal operator of the linearized imaging problem. Based on this observation we derive a method for stable recovery of the migration amplitudes from noisy data. The method corrects the amplitudes during a post-processing step after migration, such that the main additional cost is one application of the normal operator, i.e., a modeling followed by a migration. Asymptotically this normal operator corresponds to a pseudodifferential operator, for which a convenient diagonal approximation in the curvelet domain is derived, including a bound for its error and a method for the estimation of the diagonal from a compound operator consisting of discrete implementations for the scattering operator and its adjoint the migration operator. The solution is formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem where sparsity in the curvelet domain as well as continuity along the imaged reflectors are jointly promoted. To enhance sparsity, the 1-norm on the curvelet coefficients is minimized, while continuity is promoted by minimizing an anisotropic diffusion norm on the image. The performance of the recovery scheme is evaluated with a reverse-time 'wave-equation' migration code on synthetic datasets, including the complex SEG/EAGE AA salt model.
In this letter, the solutions to three seismic processing problems are presented that exploit the multiscale and multi-angular properties of the curvelet transform. Data regularization, multiple removal, and restoration of migration amplitudes are all formulated in terms of a sparsity promoting program that employs the high degree of sparsity attained by curvelets on seismic data and images. For each problem the same nonlinear program is solved, simultaneously minimizing the data misfit and the one norm (1) on the desired curveletdomain solution. Parsimony of curvelets on seismic wavefields and images of the sedimentary crust with wavefront-like features underlies the successful solution of these problems and is a clear indication of the broad applicability of this transform in exploration seismology.
The extremely large size of typical seismic imaging problems has been one of the major stumbling blocks for iterative techniques to attain accurate migration amplitudes. These iterative methods are important because they complement theoretical approaches that are hampered by difficulties to control problems such as finite-acquisition aperture, sourcereceiver frequency response, and directivity. To solve these problems, we apply preconditioning, which significantly improves convergence of least-squares migration. We discuss different levels of preconditioning that range from corrections for the order of the migration operator to corrections for spherical spreading, and position and reflector-dip dependent amplitude errors. While the first two corrections correspond to simple scalings in the Fourier and physical domain, the third correction requires phase-space (space spanned by location and dip) scaling, which we carry out with curvelets. We show that our combined preconditioner leads to a significant improvement of the convergence of least-squares 'wave-equation' migration on a line from the SEG AA' salt model.
Waveform inversion is the method of choice for determining a highly heterogeneous subsurface structure. However, conventional waveform inversion requires that the wavefield for each source is computed separately. This makes it very expensive for realistic 3D seismic surveys. Source-encoding waveform inversion, in which the sources are modeled simultaneously, is considerably faster than conventional waveform inversion but suffers from artifacts. These artifacts can partly be removed by assigning random weights to the source wavefields. We found that the misfit function, and therefore also its gradient, for source-encoding waveform inversion is an unbiased random estimation of the misfit function used in conventional waveform inversion. We found a new method of source-encoding waveform inversion that takes into account the random nature of the gradients used in the optimization. In this new method, the gradient at each iteration is a weighted average of past gradients such that the most recent gradients have the largest weights with exponential decay. This way we damped the random fluctuations of the gradient by incorporating information from the previous iterations. We compared this new method with existing source-encoding waveform inversion methods as well as conventional waveform inversion and found that the model misfit reduction is faster and smoother than those of existing source-encoding waveform inversion methods, and it approaches the model misfit reduction obtained in conventional waveform inversion.
SUMMARYFull-waveform inversion relies on the collection of large multiexperiment data volumes in combination with a sophisticated back-end to create high-fidelity inversion results. While improvements in acquisition and inversion have been extremely successful, the current trend of incessantly pushing for higher quality models in increasingly complicated regions of the Earth reveals fundamental shortcomings in our ability to handle increasing problem sizes numerically. Two main culprits can be identified. First, there is the so-called "curse of dimensionality" exemplified by Nyquist's sampling criterion, which puts disproportionate strain on current acquisition and processing systems as the size and desired resolution increases. Secondly, there is the recent "departure from Moore's law" that forces us to develop algorithms that are amenable to parallelization. In this paper, we discuss different strategies that address these issues via randomized dimensionality reduction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.