Summary. Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic adverse drug reaction caused by heparin. As thrombocytopenia is common in hospitalized patients receiving heparin, it would be useful to have a clinical scoring system that could differentiate patients with HIT from those with other reasons for thrombocytopenia. Aim: To compare prospectively the diagnostic utility of a clinical score for HIT in two different clinical settings. Methods: The pretest clinical scoring system, the Ô4 T'sÕ, was used to classify 100 consecutive patients referred for possible HIT in one hospital (Hamilton General Hospital, HGH) into high, intermediate, and low probability groups. This system was also used to classify likewise 236 patients by clinicians in Germany referring blood for diagnostic testing for HIT in Greifswald (GW). The clinical scores were correlated with the results of laboratory testing for HIT antibodies using the serologic criteria for HIT with high diagnostic specificity. Results: In both centers, patients with low scores were unlikely to test positive for HIT antibodies [HGH: 1/64 (1.6%), GW: 0/55 (0%)

r-Hirudin treatment is associated with a rapid and sustained recovery of platelet counts, sufficient aPTT prolongations, and true clinical benefits for patients with HIT.

Staphylococcus aureus is both a successful human commensal and a major pathogen. The elucidation of the molecular determinants of virulence, in particular assessment of the contributions of the genetic background versus those of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), has proved difficult in this variable species. To address this, we simultaneously determined the genetic backgrounds (spa typing) and the distributions of all 19 known superantigens and the exfoliative toxins A and D (multiplex PCR) as markers for MGEs. Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strains from Pomerania, 107 nasal and 88 blood culture isolates, were investigated. All superantigenencoding MGEs were linked more or less tightly to the genetic background. Thus, each S. aureus clonal complex was characterized by a typical repertoire of superantigen and exfoliative toxin genes. However, within each S. aureus clonal complex and even within the same spa type, virulence gene profiles varied remarkably. Therefore, virulence genes of nasal and blood culture isolates were separately compared in each clonal complex. The results indicated a role in infection for the MGE harboring the exfoliative toxin D gene. In contrast, there was no association of superantigen genes with bloodstream invasion. In summary, we show here that the simultaneous assessment of virulence gene profiles and the genetic background increases the discriminatory power of genetic investigations into the mechanisms of S. aureus pathogenesis.

Lepirudin effectively prevents death, limb amputations, and new thromboembolic complications and has an acceptable safety profile in HIT patients. Treatment should be initiated as soon as possible if HIT is suspected.

To cite this article: Greinacher A, Juhl D, Strobel U, Wessel A, Lubenow N, Selleng K, Eichler P, Warkentin TE. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a prospective study on the incidence, platelet-activating capacity and clinical significance of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA classes. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 1666-73.Summary. Introduction: Platelet-activating antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (anti-PF4/heparin) antibodies are the major cause of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, the relative utility of functional (platelet activation) vs. antigen [enzymeimmunoassay (EIA)] assays, and the significance of assay discrepancies remain unresolved. Methods: Consecutive patient sera (n = 1650) referred for diagnostic HIT testing were screened prospectively by both the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test and anti-PF4/heparin EIA -including individual classes (IgG, IgA, IgM) -with clinical correlations studied. Platelet microparticle and annexin-V-binding properties of the sera were also investigated. Results: Only 205 (12.4%) sera tested positive in either the HIPA and/or EIA: 95 (46.3%) were positive in both, 109 (53.1%) were only EIApositive, and, notably, only one serum was HIPA-positive/EIAnegative. Of 185 EIA-positive sera, only 17.6% had detectable IgM and/or IgA without detectable IgG. Among sera positive for EIA IgG, optical density values were higher when the sera were HIPA-positive (1.117 vs. 0.768; P < 0.0001), with widely overlapping values. Two HIPA-positive but EIA-IgG-negative sera became HIPA-negative following IgG depletion, suggesting platelet-activating antibodies against non-PF4-dependent antigens. Clinical correlations showed that HIPA-negative/ EIA-positive patients did not develop thrombosis and had reasons other than HIT to explain thrombocytopenia. IgM/A antibodies did not increase microparticle penetration, but increased annexin-V binding. Conclusions: The anti-PF4/ heparin EIA has high (99%) sensitivity for HIT. However, only about half of EIA-positive patients are likely to have HIT. Anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of IgM/A class and non-PF4-dependent antigens have only a minor role in HIT.

Although heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a known complication of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), its incidence in medical patients treated with subcutaneous UFH is less well defined. To determine the incidence of HIT in this category of patients, the platelet count was performed at baseline and then every 3 ؎ 1 days in 598 consecutive patients admitted to 2 medical wards and treated with subcutaneous UFH for prophylactic (n ‫؍‬ 360) or therapeutic (n ‫؍‬ 238) indications. The diagnosis of HIT was accepted in the case of a platelet drop of 50% or more and either the demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies or (when this search could not be performed) the combination of the following features: (1) the absence of any other obvious clinical explanation for thrombocytopenia, (2) the occurrence of thrombocytopenia at least 5 days after heparin start, and (3) either the normalization of the platelet count within 10 days after heparin discontinuation or the earlier patient's death due to an unexpected thromboembolic complication. HIT developed in 5 patients (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.6%); all of them belonged to the subgroup of patients who received heparin for prophylactic indications. The prevalence of thromboembolic complications in patients with HIT (60%) was remarkably higher than that observed in the remaining 593 patients (3.5%), leading to an odds ratio of 40.8 (95% CI, 5.2-162.8). Although the frequency of HIT in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous heparin is lower than that observed in other clinical settings, this complication is associated with a similarly high rate of thromboembolic events.

Summary.  Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of lepirudin in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a prospective study (HAT‐3) as well as in a combined analysis of all HAT study data. Patients/methods: Patients with laboratory‐confirmed HIT were treated with lepirudin in three different aPTT‐adjusted dose regimen and during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Endpoints were new thromboembolic complications (TEC), limb amputations, and death and major bleeding. A historical control group (n = 120) was used for comparison. Results: After start of lepirudin in 205 patients treated in HAT‐3, the combined endpoint occurred in 43 (21.0%). Thirty (14.6%) patients died, 10 (4.9%) underwent limb amputation, and 11 (5.4%) new TECs occurred. Major bleeding occurred in 40 patients (19.5%) (seven during CPB surgery). Combining all prospective HAT trials (n = 403), after start of lepirudin treatment, the combined endpoint occurred in 82 patients (20.3%), with 47 deaths (11.7%), 22 limb amputations (5.5%), 30 new TECs (7.4%), and 71 (17.6%) major bleedings. Compared with the historical control group (log‐rank test), the combined endpoint after start of treatment was reduced (29.7% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.0473), primarily because of reduction in new thromboses (11.9% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.0008). Mean lepirudin maintenance doses ranged from 0.07 to 0.11 mg kg−1 h−1. Major bleeding was more frequent in the lepirudin‐treated patients (29.4% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.0148). Conclusions: The rate of new TECs in HIT patients is low after start of lepirudin treatment. The rate of major bleeding of 17.6% might be reduced by reducing the starting dose to 0.1 mg kg−1 h−1.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)is caused by antibodies against a "self" protein-platelet factor 4-bound to heparin. We observed an overrepresentation of the female gender in 290 patients who developed HIT after cardiac or orthopedic surgery compared with the representation found in national databases (study 1). Therefore, we investigated gender imbalance in HIT by logistic regression analysis of a randomized controlled trial of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (study 2), and we analyzed individual patient data from 7 prospective studies comparing HIT frequency between UFH and LMWH, evaluating effects of gender, heparin (UFH vs LMWH), and patient type (surgical vs medical) (study 3). All 3 studies showed female overrepresentation, which for study 3 was a common odds ratio (OR) of 2.37 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.37-4.09; P ‫؍‬ .0015). Study 3 also showed an interaction between gender, heparin, and patient type. Although UFH was more likely than LMWH to cause HIT (P < .0001), this effect was predominantly seen in women compared with men (common OR, 9.22 vs 1.83; P ‫؍‬ .020) and in surgical patients compared with medical patients (common OR, 13.93 vs 1.75; P ‫؍‬ .005). We conclude that females are at greater risk for HIT and that using LMWH to prevent HIT may have greatest absolute benefit in females undergoing surgical thromboprophylaxis. IntroductionHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relatively common drug-induced immune reaction affecting platelets. 1 The immunologic basis of this disorder is the transient production 2 of plateletactivating antibodies of IgG class 3-5 that recognize multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. [6][7][8] An evolving concept is that HIT resembles an autoimmune disorder 9 because the pathogenic antibodies recognize one or more neoepitopes found on the "self" protein, PF4, rather than on heparin. 10,11 Indeed, in some patients, HIT strongly resembles an autoimmune process because heparin treatment initiates the anti-PF4/heparin antibody formation but then is no longer required for the development of thrombocytopenia. [12][13][14] To date, only a minor role for patientspecific risk factors for HIT has been reported. In particular, no association with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes is observed, 15 and the potential role of Fc receptor polymorphisms in HIT is debated. [16][17][18] We previously observed in large retrospective studies that females constituted 56.4% 2 and 58.9% 19 of HIT patients, suggesting a possible gender imbalance. Together with the emerging concept of HIT as a drug-induced transient autoimmune disorder, we hypothesized that there might be a gender imbalance in risk for this adverse drug reaction, with a greater frequency among females, as observed in certain chronic autoimmune disorders. [20][21][22] We also examined whether the striking difference in risk for HIT between unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) 23 is consistent for both genders and in ...