In African children with malaria, the presence of impaired consciousness or respiratory distress can identify those at high risk for death.
Aspergillus infections have grown in importance in the last years. However, most of the studies have focused on Aspergillus fumigatus, the most prevalent species in the genus. In certain locales and hospitals, Aspergillus flavus is more common in air than A. fumigatus, for unclear reasons. After A. fumigatus, A. flavus is the second leading cause of invasive aspergillosis and it is the most common cause of superficial infection. Experimental invasive infections in mice show A. flavus to be 100-fold more virulent than A. fumigatus in terms of inoculum required. Particularly common clinical syndromes associated with A. flavus include chronic granulomatous sinusitis, keratitis, cutaneous aspergillosis, wound infections and osteomyelitis following trauma and inoculation. Outbreaks associated with A. flavus appear to be associated with single or closely related strains, in contrast to those associated with A. fumigatus. In addition, A. flavus produces aflatoxins, the most toxic and potent hepatocarcinogenic natural compounds ever characterized. Accurate species identification within Aspergillus flavus complex remains difficult due to overlapping morphological and biochemical characteristics, and much taxonomic and population genetics work is necessary to better understand the species and related species. The flavus complex currently includes 23 species or varieties, including two sexual species, Petromyces alliaceus and P. albertensis. The genome of the highly related Aspergillus oryzae is completed and available; that of A. flavus in the final stages of annotation. Our understanding of A. flavus lags far behind that of A. fumigatus. Studies of the genomics, taxonomy, population genetics, pathogenicity, allergenicity and antifungal susceptibility of A. flavus are all required.
For 70 years antibiotics have saved countless lives and enabled the development of modern medicine, but it is becoming clear that the success of antibiotics may have only been temporary and we now anticipate a long-term, generational and perhaps never-ending challenge to find new therapies to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. As the search for new conventional antibiotics has become less productive and there are no clear strategies to improve success, a broader approach to address bacterial infection is needed. This review of potential alternatives to antibiotics (A2As) was commissioned by the Wellcome Trust, jointly funded by the Department of Health, and involved scientists and physicians from academia and industry. For the purpose of this review, A2As were defined as non-compound approaches (that is, products other than classical antibacterial agents) that target bacteria or approaches that target the host. In addition, the review was limited to agents that had potential to be administered orally, by inhalation or by injection for treatment of systemic/invasive infection. Within these criteria, the review has identified 19 A2A approaches now being actively progressed. The feasibility and potential clinical impact of each approach was considered. The most advanced approaches (and the only ones likely to deliver new treatments by 2025) are antibodies, probiotics, and vaccines now in Phase II and Phase III trials. These new agents will target infections caused by P. aeruginosa, C. difficile and S. aureus. However, other than probiotics for C. difficile, this first wave will likely best serve as adjunctive or preventive therapies. This suggests that conventional antibiotics will still be needed. The economics of pathogen-specific therapies must improve to encourage innovation, and greater investment into A2As with broad-spectrum activity (e.g. antimicrobial-, host defense-and, anti-biofilm peptides) is needed. Increased funding, estimated at >£1.5 bn over 10 years is required to validate and then develop these A2As. Investment needs to be partnered with translational expertise and targeted to support the validation of these approaches at Clinical Phase II proof of concept. Such an approach could transform our understanding of A2As as effective new therapies and should provide the catalyst required for both active engagement and investment by the pharma/biotech industry. Only a sustained, concerted and coordinated international effort will provide the solutions needed for the next decade.
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, the most common enzymopathy of humans, affects over 400 million people. The geographical correlation of its distribution with the historical endemicity of malaria suggests that this disorder has risen in frequency through natural selection by malaria. However, attempts to confirm that G6PD deficiency is protective in case-control studies of malaria have yielded conflicting results. Hence, for this X-linked disorder, it is unclear whether both male hemizygotes and female heterozygotes are protected or, as frequently suggested, only females. Furthermore, how much protection may be afforded is unknown. Here we report that, in two large case-control studies of over 2,000 African children, the common African form of G6PD deficiency (G6PD A-) is associated with a 46-58% reduction in risk of severe malaria for both female heterozygotes and male hemizygotes. A mathematical model incorporating the measured selective advantage against malaria suggests that a counterbalancing selective disadvantage, associated with this enzyme deficiency, has retarded its rise in frequency in malaria-endemic regions. Although G6PD deficiency is now regarded as a generally benign disorder, in earlier environmental conditions it could have been significantly disadvantageous.
SummarySevere anaemia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in African children, but the causes, particularly falciparum malaria, are difficult to determine. We assessed the contribution of falciparum malaria to anaemia in Kenyan children by clinical examination and measurement of parasitaemia and haemoglobin (Hb) concentration in 559 children in the community and in 2412 children admitted to Kilifi district hospital during a 2-year period. We also attempted to characterize severe malarial anaemia by examining the causes and pathophysiology of anaemia in 101 children admitted with Hb concentration^50 g/l during a 1-year period. Plasmodium falciparum infection was associated with reduced Hb concentration in children in the community and in those admitted to hospital irrespective of diagnosis. Falciparum malaria was the primary cause in 46 cases (46%) of severe anaemia admitted to hospital. There was no difference in the frequency of haemolysis or dyserythropoiesis in the children with malarial anaemia and those with anaemia from other causes, such as iron deficiency or sickle cell disease. The mortality rate in the children with severe malarial anaemia was 8.6% compared with 3.6% in children with severe anaemia due to other causes. Falciparum malaria does not present with a characteristic clinical or haematological picture, but is a major cause of the morbidity and mortality in children with severe anaemia who live on the Kenyan coast, a malaria endemic area.
Candida albicans is a major fungal pathogen of humans. It exists as a commensal in the oral cavity, gut or genital tract of most individuals, constrained by the local microbiota, epithelial barriers and immune defences. Their perturbation can lead to fungal outgrowth and the development of mucosal infections such as oropharyngeal or vulvovaginal candidiasis, and patients with compromised immunity are susceptible to life-threatening systemic infections. The importance of the interplay between fungus, host and microbiota in driving the transition from C. albicans commensalism to pathogenicity is widely appreciated. However, the complexity of these interactions, and the significant impact of fungal, host and microbiota variability upon disease severity and outcome, are less well understood. Therefore, we summarise the features of the fungus that promote infection, and how genetic variation between clinical isolates influences pathogenicity. We discuss antifungal immunity, how this differs between mucosae, and how individual variation influences a person's susceptibility to infection. Also, we describe factors that influence the composition of gut, oral and vaginal microbiotas, and how these affect fungal colonisation and antifungal immunity. We argue that a detailed understanding of these variables, which underlie fungal-host-microbiota interactions, will present opportunities for directed antifungal therapies that benefit vulnerable patients.
Aspergillus fumigatus is a clinically important fungus with the ability to cause invasive aspergillosis with high mortality rates in immunocompromised patients and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in immunocompetent individuals. Virulence of mutants has traditionally been assessed using mammalian hosts such as mice and rats and more recently the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, demonstrated the potential to act as an in vivo host suitable for screening Aspergillus mutants. In this study using a larger thermotolerant invertebrate, Galleria mellonella, the virulence of individual gene deletants of Aspergillus fumigatus (cpcA, sidA, sidC, sidD, sidF and paba,) were compared to the parental and gene-replacement strains, if available. A range of infectious challenges consisting of from 3 × 10(3)-3 × 10(6) spores/larva was followed by observation of larval survival with mean survival time used as a surrogate of microbial pathogenicity. Mutants cpcA, sidA, sidF and paba were avirulent and sidC and sidD showed attenuated virulence. Virulence assessment in G. mellonella correlated closely with the historic data generated using mice and Drosophila. Pre-screening Aspergillus mutants using G. mellonella could significantly reduce the number of mammals required to assess changes in virulence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.