The role of lipid rafts in T cell antigen receptor (TCR) signaling was investigated using fluorescence microscopy. Lipid rafts labeled with cholera toxin B subunit (CT-B) and cross-linked into patches displayed characteristics of rafts isolated biochemically, including detergent resistance and colocalization with raft-associated proteins. LCK, LAT, and the TCR all colocalized with lipid patches, although TCR association was sensitive to nonionic detergent. Aggregation of the TCR by anti-CD3 mAb cross-linking also caused coaggregation of raft-associated proteins. However, the protein tyrosine phosphatase CD45 did not colocalize to either CT-B or CD3 patches. Cross-linking of either CD3 or CT-B strongly induced tyrosine phosphorylation and recruitment of a ZAP-70(SH2)2–green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein to the lipid patches. Also, CT-B patching induced signaling events analagous to TCR stimulation, with the same dependence on expression of key TCR signaling molecules. Targeting of LCK to rafts was necessary for these events, as a nonraft- associated transmembrane LCK chimera, which did not colocalize with TCR patches, could not reconstitute CT-B–induced signaling. Thus, our results indicate a mechanism whereby TCR engagement promotes aggregation of lipid rafts, which facilitates colocalization of LCK, LAT, and the TCR whilst excluding CD45, thereby triggering protein tyrosine phosphorylation.

The Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ephrin ligands are mediators of cell-cell communication. Cleavage of ephrin-A2 by the ADAM10 membrane metalloprotease enables contact repulsion between Eph- and ephrin-expressing cells. How ADAM10 interacts with ephrins in a regulated manner to cleave only Eph bound ephrin molecules remains unclear. The structure of ADAM10 disintegrin and cysteine-rich domains and the functional studies presented here define an essential substrate-recognition module for functional interaction of ADAM10 with the ephrin-A5/EphA3 complex. While ADAM10 constitutively associates with EphA3, the formation of a functional EphA3/ephrin-A5 complex creates a new molecular recognition motif for the ADAM10 cysteine-rich domain that positions the proteinase domain for effective ephrin-A5 cleavage. Surprisingly, the cleavage occurs in trans, with ADAM10 and its substrate being on the membranes of opposing cells. Our data suggest a simple mechanism for regulating ADAM10-mediated ephrin proteolysis, which ensures that only Eph bound ephrins are recognized and cleaved.

No abstract

Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and their ephrin ligands regulate cell navigation during normal and oncogenic development. Signaling of Ephs is initiated in a multistep process leading to the assembly of higher-order signaling clusters that set off bidirectional signaling in interacting cells. However, the structural and mechanistic details of this assembly remained undefined. Here we present high-resolution structures of the complete EphA2 ectodomain and complexes with ephrin-A1 and A5 as the base unit of an Eph cluster. The structures reveal an elongated architecture with novel Eph/Eph interactions, both within and outside of the Eph ligand-binding domain, that suggest the molecular mechanism underlying Eph/ephrin clustering. Structure-function analysis, by using site-directed mutagenesis and cell-based signaling assays, confirms the importance of the identified oligomerization interfaces for Eph clustering.cell-cell attraction and repulsion | Eph receptor clustering

Screening of a human breast epithelial cell cDNA library with the tyrosine-phosphorylated C terminus of the epidermal growth factor receptor identified a novel member of the GRB7 gene family, designated GRB14. In addition to a pleckstrin homology domain-containing central region homologous to the Caenorhabditis elegans protein F10E9.6/mig 10 and a C-terminal Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, a conserved N-terminal motif, P(S/A)IPNPFPEL, can now be included as a hallmark of this family. GRB14 mRNA was expressed at high levels in the liver, kidney, pancreas, testis, ovary, heart, and skeletal muscle. Anti-Grb14 antibodies recognized a protein of approximately 58 kDa in a restricted range of human cell lines. Among those of breast cancer origin, GRB14 expression strongly correlated with estrogen receptor positivity, and differential expression was also observed among human prostate cancer cell lines. A GST-Grb14 SH2 domain fusion protein exhibited strong binding to activated platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors (PDGFRs) in vitro, but association between Grb14 and ␤-PDGFRs could not be detected in vivo. In serum-starved cells, Grb14 was phosphorylated on serine residues, which increased with PDGF, but not EGF, treatment. Grb14 is therefore a target for a PDGFregulated serine kinase, an interaction that does not require PDGFR-Grb14 association. Many intracellular targets for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)1 contain one or more SH2 domains. These are conserved, noncatalytic domains of approximately 100 amino acids that bind to short peptide sequences containing phosphotyrosine (1). Since receptor autophosphorylation on specific tyrosine residues follows RTK activation, SH2 domains mediate receptor-substrate interactions as well as other protein-protein interactions during signal transduction. Since the specificity of SH2 domain binding is largely determined by amino acid residues C-terminal to the phosphotyrosine, the particular autophosphorylation sites present on a given RTK define the SH2 domain-containing signaling proteins that it can recruit and hence, to a large extent, the signaling specificity of the receptor. The CORT technique, in which cDNA expression libraries are screened with the tyrosine-phosphorylated C terminus of the EGFR, represents a powerful methodology for the identification and characterization of novel, SH2 domain-containing, receptor substrates (2-5).SH2 domains are often accompanied in signaling proteins by two other conserved protein modules: SH3 domains, which bind to proline-rich peptide ligands with a PXXP core sequence (6) and thereby also mediate protein-protein interactions, and PH domains. The latter are conserved protein modules now identified in about 60 intracellular proteins, most of which either perform a signaling function or are associated with the membrane cytoskeleton (7). Despite the frequent occurrence of the PH domain and the recent definition of its three-dimensional structure (8 -11) the precise role of this module remains obscure. Although several PH domains bin...

SUMMARY Cleavage of membrane-anchored proteins by ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) endopeptidases plays a key role in a wide variety of biological signal transduction and protein turnover processes. Among ADAM family members, ADAM10 stands out as particularly important because it is both responsible for regulated proteolysis of Notch receptors and catalyzes the non-amyloidogenic α-secretase cleavage of the Alzheimer’s precursor protein, APP. We present here the X-ray crystal structure of the ADAM10 ectodomain, which together with biochemical and cellular studies reveals how access to the enzyme active site is regulated. The enzyme adopts an unanticipated architecture, in which the C-terminal cysteine-rich domain partially occludes the enzyme active site, preventing unfettered substrate access. Binding of a modulatory antibody to the cysteine-rich domain liberates the catalytic domain from autoinhibition, enhancing enzymatic activity toward a peptide substrate. Together, these studies reveal a mechanism for regulation of ADAM activity and offer a roadmap for its modulation.

Eph receptors and their cell membrane–bound ephrin ligands regulate cell positioning and thereby establish or stabilize patterns of cellular organization. Although it is recognized that ephrin clustering is essential for Eph function, mechanisms that relay information of ephrin density into cell biological responses are poorly understood. We demonstrate by confocal time-lapse and fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy that within minutes of binding ephrin-A5–coated beads, EphA3 receptors assemble into large clusters. While remaining positioned around the site of ephrin contact, Eph clusters exceed the size of the interacting ephrin surface severalfold. EphA3 mutants with compromised ephrin-binding capacity, which alone are incapable of cluster formation or phosphorylation, are recruited effectively and become phosphorylated when coexpressed with a functional receptor. Our findings reveal consecutive initiation of ephrin-facilitated Eph clustering and cluster propagation, the latter of which is independent of ephrin contacts and cytosolic Eph signaling functions but involves direct Eph–Eph interactions.

Eph receptors, the largest subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases, are linked with proliferative disease, such as cancer, as a result of their deregulated expression or mutation. Unlike other tyrosine kinases that have been clinically targeted, the development of therapeutics against Eph receptors remains at a relatively early stage. The major reason is the limited understanding on the Eph receptor regulatory mechanisms at a molecular level. The complexity in understanding Eph signalling in cells arises due to following reasons: (1) Eph receptors comprise 14 members, two of which are pseudokinases, EphA10 and EphB6, with relatively uncharacterised function; (2) activation of Eph receptors results in dimerisation, oligomerisation and formation of clustered signalling centres at the plasma membrane, which can comprise different combinations of Eph receptors, leading to diverse downstream signalling outputs; (3) the non-catalytic functions of Eph receptors have been overlooked. This review provides a structural perspective of the intricate molecular mechanisms that drive Eph receptor signalling, and investigates the contribution of intra-and inter-molecular interactions between Eph receptors intracellular domains and their major binding partners. We focus on the non-catalytic functions of Eph receptors with relevance to cancer, which are further substantiated by exploring the role of the two pseudokinase Eph receptors, EphA10 and EphB6. Throughout this review, we carefully analyse and reconcile the existing/conflicting data in the field, to allow researchers to further the current understanding of Eph receptor signalling. Eph receptors and ephrin ligands: an overview Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are a major type of membrane receptors, which govern cell proliferation, differentiation and mobility [1]. Deregulation of RTK signalling pathways leads to many diseases, such as cancers and developmental disorders [2]. The erythropoietin-producing hepatoma (Eph) receptor subfamily is the largest amongst the RTKs with 14 members classified into type A and type B. Compared with other RTKs, Eph receptors share