The field of aging and dementia is focusing on the characterization of the earliest stages of cognitive impairment. Recent research has identified a transitional state between the cognitive changes of normal aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), known as mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Mild cognitive impairment refers to the clinical condition between normal aging and AD in which persons experience memory loss to a greater extent than one would expect for age, yet they do not meet currently accepted criteria for clinically probable AD. When these persons are observed longitudinally, they progress to clinically probable AD at a considerably accelerated rate compared with healthy age-matched individuals. Consequently, this condition has been recognized as suitable for possible therapeutic intervention, and several multicenter international treatment trials are under way. Because this is a topic of intense interest, a group of experts on aging and MCI from around the world in the fields of neurology, psychiatry, geriatrics, neuropsychology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, clinical trials, and ethics was convened to summarize the current state of the field of MCI. Participants reviewed the world scientific literature on aging and MCI and summarized the various topics with respect to available evidence on MCI. Diagnostic criteria and clinical outcomes of these subjects are available in the literature. Mild cognitive impairment is believed to be a high-risk condition for the development of clinically probable AD. Heterogeneity in the use of the term was recognized, and subclassifications were suggested. While no treatments are recommended for MCI currently, clinical trials regarding potential therapies are under way. Recommendations concerning ethical issues in the diagnosis and the management of subjects with MCI were made.

In terms of epidemiology, symptom profile, and identified pathophysiologies, the diagnoses of late-onset schizophrenia (illness onset after 40 years of age) and very-late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis (onset after 60 years) have face validity and clinical utility. General adoption of these categories will foster systematic investigation of such patients.

In a nationally representative sample, higher Medicare expenditures associated with a diagnosis of dementia are in large part due to increased hospitalization. Further study is needed into the factors associated with high rates of hospitalization in dementia patients including aspects of ambulatory management that may be improved.

Among adults aged 50 years and older, nondysphoric depression may be as important as Major Depression in relation to the development of functional disability and other long-term outcomes.

Importance Agitation is common, persistent, and associated with adverse consequences for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Pharmacological treatment options, including antipsychotics are not satisfactory. Objective The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of citalopram for agitation in patients with AD. Key secondary objectives examined effects of citalopram on function, caregiver distress, safety, cognitive safety, and tolerability. Design, Setting and Participants The Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease Study (CitAD) was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial that enrolled 186 patients with probable AD and clinically significant agitation from eight academic centers in the US and Canada from August 2009 to January 2013. Interventions Participants (n=186) were randomized to receive a psychosocial intervention plus either citalopram (n=94) or placebo (n=92) for 9 weeks. Dose began at 10 mg/d with planned titration to 30 mg/d over 3 weeks based on response and tolerability. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcome measures were the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale, agitation subscale (NBRS-A) and the modified Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS-CGIC) Other outcomes were the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), activities of daily living (ADLs), caregiver distress, cognitive safety (MMSE), and adverse events. Results Participants on citalopram showed significant improvement compared to placebo on both primary outcome measures. NBRS-A estimated treatment difference at week 9 (citalopram minus placebo) was −0.93 [95% CI: −1.80 to −0.06], p = 0.036. mADCS-CGIC results showed 40% of citalopram participants having moderate or marked improvement from baseline compared to 26% on placebo, with estimated treatment effect (odds ratio of being at or better than a given CGIC category) of 2.13 [95% CI 1.23 to 3.69], p = 0.007. Participants on citalopram showed significant improvement on the CMAI, total NPI and caregiver distress scores but not on the NPI agitation subscale, ADLs, or in less use of rescue lorazepam. Worsening of cognition (−1.05 points [95% CI: −1.97 to −0.13], p = 0.026) and QT interval prolongation (18.1 ms [95% CI: 6.1, 30.1], p = 0.004) were seen in the citalopram group. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and agitation receiving psychosocial intervention, the addition of citalopram compared with placebo significantly reduced agitation and caregiver distress, but cognitive and cardiac adverse effects of citalopram may limit its practical application at the 30 mg/d dose studied in this trial.

OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs in a sample of community-residing persons with dementia (PWD) and their informal caregivers. DESIGN Analysis of cross-sectional, baseline participant characteristics prior to randomization in a care coordination intervention trial. SETTING Baltimore, MD. PARTICIPANTS Community-residing PWD (n=254) and their informal caregivers (n=246). MEASUREMENTS In-home assessments of dementia-related needs based on the Johns Hopkins Dementia Care Needs Assessment. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, functional and quality of life correlates of unmet needs. RESULTS The mean number of unmet needs in PWD was 7.7 (SD=4.8) and 4.6 (SD=2.3) in caregivers, with almost all PWD (99%) and caregivers (97%) having one or more unmet needs. Unmet needs in PWD were significantly greater among those with higher cognitive function. Ninety percent of PWD had unmet safety needs, over half had unmet needs for meaningful activities, and almost one-third had not received a prior evaluation or diagnosis. Higher unmet needs in PWD were associated significantly with non-white race, lower incomes, less impairment in activities of daily living and more symptoms of depression. For caregivers, more than 85% had unmet needs for resource referrals and caregiver education. Higher unmet caregiver needs were associated significantly with non-white race, less education, and more symptoms of depression. CONCLUSION Many community-residing PWD and their caregivers have unmet dementia-related needs for care, services and support. Providers should be aware that unmet needs may be higher among minority and low-income community residents, caregivers with lower education, and individuals with early-stage dementia. Identifying and treating symptoms of depression in PWD and caregivers may enable them to address their other unmet needs.

Anxiety disorders are common in Parkinson's Disease (PD), but are not well-characterized. This study determined the prevalence and clinical correlates of all DSM-IV-TR anxiety disorder diagnoses in a sample of 127 subjects with idiopathic PD who underwent comprehensive assessments administered by a psychiatrist and neurologist. A panel of six psychiatrists with expertise in geriatric psychiatry and/or movement disorders established by consensus all psychiatric diagnoses. Current and lifetime prevalence of at least one anxiety disorder diagnosis was 43% (n=55) and 49% (n=63), respectively. Anxiety Disorder Not Otherwise Specified, a DSM diagnosis used for anxiety disturbances not meeting criteria for defined subtypes, was the most common diagnosis (30% lifetime prevalence, n=38). Compared to non-anxious subjects, panic disorder (n=13) was associated with earlier age of PD onset [50.3(12.2) vs. 61.0(13.7) years, p<.01], higher rates of motor fluctuations [77% (10/13) vs. 39% (25/64), p=.01] and morning dystonia [38% (5/13) vs. 13% (8/62), p<.03]. This high prevalence of anxiety disorders, including disturbances often not meeting conventional diagnostic criteria, suggests that anxiety in PD is likely under-diagnosed and under-treated and refined characterization of anxiety disorders in PD is needed. In addition, certain anxiety subtypes may be clinically useful markers associated with disease impact in PD.

Objectives-Progression of Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is highly variable. Most estimates derive from convenience samples from dementia clinics or research centers where there is substantial potential for survival bias and other distortions. In a population-based sample of incident AD cases, we examined progression of impairment in cognition, function, and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and the influence of selected variables on these domains. Design-Longitudinal, prospective cohort study Setting-Cache County (Utah)Participants-328 persons diagnosed with Possible/Probable AD Measurements-Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating sum-of-boxes (CDR-sb), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).Results-Over a mean follow-up of 3.80 (range 0.07-12.90) years, the mean (S.D.) annual rates of change were −1.53 (2.69) on the MMSE, 1.44 (1.82) on the CDR-sb, and 2.55 (5.37) scale points on the NPI. Among surviving participants, 30-58% progressed less than one point/year on these measures, even 5-7 years after dementia onset. Rates of change were correlated between MMSE and CDR-sb (r=−0.62, df=201, p<0.001) and between the CDR-sb and NPI (r=0.20, df=206, p<0.004). Females (LR χ 2 =8.7, df=2, p=0.013) and those with younger onset (LR χ 2 =5.7, df=2, p=0.058) declined faster on the MMSE. Although one or more APOE ε4 alleles and ever-use of FDA-approved anti-dementia medications were associated with initial MMSE scores, neither was related to the rate of progression in any domain.Conclusions-A significant proportion of persons with AD progresses slowly. The results underscore differences between population-vs. clinic-based samples and suggest ongoing need to identify factors that may slow the progression of AD. KeywordsAlzheimer's disease; dementia; cognition; neuropsychiatric symptoms; progression; decline Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is a significant cause of disability and mortality among the elderly. Some 26.6 million cases presently worldwide may increase to 106.2 million by 2050,(1) unless a means of prevention can be identified. Without a cure, better understanding of the clinical course and course-modifying factors is needed.AD causes impairment not only in cognition and function, but also in behavior prompted by neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). Numerous studies report significant variability in the rate of cognitive and functional decline in AD. For example, a recent review reported that the mean annual rate of change (ARC) on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), a global measure of cognition, varied from 0.8 to 4.4 points.(2) Similar variability is seen in functional decline,(3) although comparisons across studies are impeded by differences in instrumentation. NPS in AD are marked by increasing incidence over time and by an episodic course. (4) These studies of the natural history of AD share several limitations. Most come from observations in clinics or clinical research centers. Compared to panels of AD cases ascertained from populations, clinic AD patients are up to 20 years younger, have higher Here, we d...