Serial quantitation of BCR-ABL IntroductionReverse-transcription real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) is used routinely to quantify levels of BCR-ABL mRNA in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples from chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients undergoing therapy. The technique can accurately determine response to treatment and is particularly valuable for patients who have achieved a complete cytogenetic response. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 1 and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2 recommend similar monitoring schedules for patients treated with imatinib and the ELN defines an optimal response as the attainment of a major molecular response (MMR) after 18 months of therapy. Monitoring of BCR-ABL mRNA levels is also useful for gauging therapeutic response for patients with Philadelphia chromosomepositive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph ϩ ALL). The CML meeting at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda in October 2005 made several recommendations for the harmonization of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment and proposed an international scale (IS) for BCR-ABL RQ-PCR measurements. 8 Importantly, the IS is essentially identical to that used in the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) study, 9 with the IRIS standardized baseline defined as 100% BCR-ABL IS and MMR (3-log reduction relative to the standardized baseline) defined as 0.1% BCR-ABL IS . The original standards used for the IRIS trial are no longer available, however traceability to the IRIS scale is provided by the extensive quality control data generated by the Adelaide laboratory over a period of several years. 10,11 To enable testing centers to gain access to the IS, the Adelaide laboratory initiated a process to develop and validate laboratoryspecific conversion factors (CFs) that can be used to convert local values to IS values. 11 The strength of this approach is that testing centers can continue to use their existing assay conditions and continue to express results according to local preferences in addition to expressing results on the IS. The concept of the IS is analogous to established procedures for other quantitative assays, for example the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for prothrombin time. 12 Many laboratories with validated CFs have established themselves as national or regional reference laboratories and are in the process of propagating CFs to local centers. 13 While this process has generally worked well, it is apparent that the establishment of CFs is time-consuming, complex, expensive, and open to only a limited number of laboratories at any given time. Furthermore, it is unclear how frequently any individual CF will need to be revalidated. We sought therefore to develop an alternative means for testing laboratories to access the IS by developing calibrated, accredited primary reference reagents for BCR-ABL RQ-PCR analysis. StrategyIdeally, the formulation for primary reference reagents should be as close as possible to the usual analyte, should cove...

Sensors are a sample contacting technology, and when exposed to biological matrices tend to suffer from the problem of poor biocompatibility and surface fouling. The effects are evidenced by time dependant signal drift (particularly for those devices which are implanted intravascularly). Practical methods to reduce such effects require an understanding of the interface between the electrode and its environment prior to assessment of the potential areas for improvement. Current procedures employed to overcome the observed losses in electrode sensitivity (following exposure to whole blood) include surface modification of the outer diffusion limiting membrane (via variation in film porosity) or even biomimicry of the fluid cell membrane. At amperometric electrodes incorporation of additional inner perm‐selective membranes has achieved a reduction in electrode passivation from undesirable surface active compounds as has the use of low polarisation potentials. Other studies have attempted to induce an aqueous barrier between the matrix and the electrode tip which physically prevents passage of cellular components from the sensor surface.Careful choice of the system and materials will ultimately lead to biocompatible non‐fouling devices capable of functioning in an array of bio‐environments suitable for clinical monitoring of the critically ill patient.

BackgroundAt a World Health Organization (WHO) sponsored meeting it was concluded that there is an urgent need for a reference preparation that contains antibodies against malaria antigens in order to support serology studies and vaccine development. It was proposed that this reference would take the form of a lyophilized serum or plasma pool from a malaria-endemic area. In response, an immunoassay standard, comprising defibrinated human plasma has been prepared and evaluated in a collaborative study.ResultsA pool of human plasma from a malaria endemic region was collected from 140 single plasma donations selected for reactivity to Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) and merozoite surface proteins (MSP-119, MSP-142, MSP-2 and MSP-3). This pool was defibrinated, filled and freeze dried into a single batch of ampoules to yield a stable source of naturally occurring antibodies to P. falciparum. The preparation was evaluated by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a collaborative study with sixteen participants from twelve different countries. This anti-malaria human serum preparation (NIBSC Code: 10/198) was adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in October 2014, as the first WHO reference reagent for anti-malaria (Plasmodium falciparum) human serum with an assigned arbitrary unitage of 100 units (U) per ampoule.ConclusionAnalysis of the reference reagent in a collaborative study has demonstrated the benefit of this preparation for the reduction in inter- and intra-laboratory variability in ELISA. Whilst locally sourced pools are regularly use for harmonization both within and between a few laboratories, the presence of a WHO-endorsed reference reagent should enable optimal harmonization of malaria serological assays either by direct use of the reference reagent or calibration of local standards against this WHO reference. The intended uses of this reference reagent, a multivalent preparation, are (1) to allow cross-comparisons of results of vaccine trials performed in different centres/with different products; (2) to facilitate standardization and harmonization of immunological assays used in epidemiology research; and (3) to allow optimization and validation of immunological assays used in malaria vaccine development.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1958-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

BackgroundThe recent Ebola outbreak in West Africa led to the use of a variety of different platform technologies for assaying antibodies because of the difficulties of handling the live virus. The same types of method could be applied rapidly to other infections when they emerge. There is a need to compare quantitative results of different assays, which means that the assays must measure similar parameters and give comparable results.MethodsA collaborative study was carried out to establish an International Reference Reagent through WHO. Nine samples were sent to 16 laboratories and the results from 22 different assays compared to those obtained by neutralisation assays using the wild type virus.FindingsQuantitative correlation with the wild type neutralisation assays was very variable but generally poor, with only five of the twenty-two assays giving a correlation coefficient of 0.7 or greater; the five best assays included methods based on wild type and VSV pseudotype neutralisation and ELISA. They could be applicable to other rapidly emerging diseases. The remaining assays including neutralisation of lentiviral pseudotypes need further development.InterpretationThe assay platform should be chosen with care to ensure that it is fit for purpose. Many of the assays were not suitable for quantitation of antibody levels, a finding that is not surprising given the urgency with which they had to be implemented but some may be of generic value. Antibody titres in samples from a vaccine trial were comparable to those from convalescent patients or lower.FundingFunding was from the UK DoH and the Wellcome Tust.

No abstract

No abstract

Laboratories can use this standard to measure the anti-HPA-1a activity in patient's samples. Further studies are required to determine the relationship between anti-HPA-1a activity and clinical outcome in patients with neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT).