Specific modifications to histones are essential epigenetic markers---heritable changes in gene expression that do not affect the DNA sequence. Methylation of lysine 9 in histone H3 is recognized by heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), which directs the binding of other proteins to control chromatin structure and gene expression. Here we show that HP1 uses an induced-fit mechanism for recognition of this modification, as revealed by the structure of its chromodomain bound to a histone H3 peptide dimethylated at Nzeta of lysine 9. The binding pocket for the N-methyl groups is provided by three aromatic side chains, Tyr21, Trp42 and Phe45, which reside in two regions that become ordered on binding of the peptide. The side chain of Lys9 is almost fully extended and surrounded by residues that are conserved in many other chromodomains. The QTAR peptide sequence preceding Lys9 makes most of the additional interactions with the chromodomain, with HP1 residues Val23, Leu40, Trp42, Leu58 and Cys60 appearing to be a major determinant of specificity by binding the key buried Ala7. These findings predict which other chromodomains will bind methylated proteins and suggest a motif that they recognize.

HP1 family proteins are adaptor molecules, containing two related chromo domains that are required for chromatin packaging and gene silencing. Here we present the structure of the chromo shadow domain from mouse HP1b bound to a peptide containing a consensus PXVXL motif found in many HP1 binding partners. The shadow domain exhibits a novel mode of peptide recognition, where the peptide binds across the dimer interface, sandwiched in a b-sheet between strands from each monomer. The structure allows us to predict which other shadow domains bind similar PXVXL motif-containing peptides and provides a framework for predicting the sequence specificity of the others. We show that targeting of HP1b to heterochromatin requires shadow domain interactions with PXVXL-containing proteins in addition to chromo domain recognition of Lys-9-methylated histone H3. Interestingly, it also appears to require the simultaneous recognition of two Lys-9-methylated histone H3 molecules. This finding implies a further complexity to the histone code for regulation of chromatin structure and suggests how binding of HP1 family proteins may lead to its condensation.

The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family of proteins is involved in gene silencing via the formation of heterochromatic structures. They are composed of two related domains: an N-terminal chromo domain and a C-terminal shadow chromo domain. Present results suggest that chromo domains may function as protein interaction motifs, bringing together different proteins in multi-protein complexes and locating them in heterochromatin. We have previously determined the structure of the chromo domain from the mouse HP1β protein, MOD1. We show here that, in contrast to the chromo domain, the shadow chromo domain is a homodimer. The intact HP1β protein is also dimeric, where the interaction is mediated by the shadow chromo domain, with the chromo domains moving independently of each other at the end of flexible linkers. Mapping studies, with fragments of the CAF1 and TIF1β proteins, show that an intact, dimeric, shadow chromo domain structure is required for complex formation. Keywords: chromatin structure/chromo domain/ heterochromatin protein 1/protein complex/protein structure

No abstract

Because of the low solubility of lipids in water, intercellular and intracellular pathways of lipid transfer are necessary, e.g., for membrane formation. The mechanism by which lipids in vivo are transported from their site of biogenesis (endoplasmatic reticulum and the chloroplasts) to their place of action is unknown. Several small plant proteins with the ability to mediate transfer of radiolabeled phospholipids in vitro from liposomal donor membranes to mitochondrial and chloroplast acceptor membranes have been isolated, and a protein with this ability, the nonspecific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) isolated from barley seeds (bLTP), has been studied here. The structure and the protein lipid interactions of lipid transfer proteins are relevant for the understanding of their function, and here we present the three-dimensional structure in solution of bLTP as determined by NMR spectroscopy. The ' H NMR spectrum of the 91-residue protein was assigned for more than 97% of the protein ' H atoms, and the structure was calculated on the basis of 813 distance restraints from 'H-'H nuclear Overhauser effects, four disulfide bond restraints, from dihedral angle restraints for 66 @-angles, 61 x' angles, and 2 x ' angles, and from 31 sets of hydrogen bond restraints. The solution structure of bLTP consists of four well-defined a-helices A-D (A, Cys 3-Gly 19; B, Gly 25-Ala 38; C, Arg 44-Gly 57; D, Leu 63-Cys 73), separated by three short loops that are less well defined and concluded by a well defined C-terminal peptide segment with no observable regular secondary structure. For the 17 structures that are used to represent the solution structure of bLTP, the RMS deviation to an average structure is 0.63 A f 0.04 A for backbone atoms and 0.93 A k 0.06 A for all heavy atoms. The secondary structure elements and their locations in the sequence resemble those of nsLTP from two other plant species, wheat and maize, whose structures were previously determined (Gincel E et al, 1995, Eur JBiochern 226:413-422; Shin DH et al, 1995, Structure3: 189-199). In bLTP, the residues analogous to those in maize nsLTP that constitute the palmitate binding site are forming a similar hydrophobic cavity and a potential acyl group binding site. Analysis of the solution structure of bLTP and bLTP in complex with a ligand might provide information on the conformational changes in the protein upon ligand binding and subsequently provide information on the mode of ligand uptake and release. In this work, we hope to establish a foundation for further work of determining the solution structure of bLTP in complex with palmitoyl coenzyme A, which is a suitable ligand, and subsequently to outline the mode of ligand binding.

No abstract

We report here the structure of the putative chromo domain from MOF, a member of the MYST family of histone acetyltransferases that acetylates histone H4 at Lys-16 and is part of the dosage compensation complex in Drosophila. We found that the structure of this domain is a ␤-barrel that is distinct from the ␣ ؉ ␤ fold of the canonical chromo domain. Despite the differences, there are similarities that support an evolutionary relationship between the two domains, and we propose the name "chromo barrel." The chromo barrel domains may be divided into two groups, MSL3-like and MOF-like, on the basis of whether a group of conserved aromatic residues is present or not. The structure suggests that, although the MOF-like domains may have a role in RNA binding, the MSL3-like domains could instead bind methylated residues. The MOF chromo barrel shares a common fold with other chromatin-associated modules, including the MBT-like repeat, Tudor, and PWWP domains. This structural similarity suggests a probable evolutionary pathway from these other modules to the canonical chromo domains (or vice versa) with the chromo barrel domain representing an intermediate structure.

The a,macroglobulin-receptor-associated protein (RAP) binds to the a,macroglobulin receptor/lowdensity lipoprotein receptor-related protein (a,MR/LRP), a multi-functional cell surface receptor known to bind and internalize several macromolecular ligands. RAP has been shown to inhibit binding of all known a,MR/LRP ligands. Mutational studies have implicated distinct parts of RAP as specifically involved in inhibition of binding of a multitude of ligands.In the present paper we provide experimental evidence allowing assignment of elements of triplicate internal sequence similarity in RAP, noted previously [Warshawsky, I., Sites within the 39-kDa protein important for regulating ligand binding to the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, Biochemistry 34, 3404-34151, to three structural domains, 1, 2 and 3, comprising residues 18-112, 113-218 and 219-323 of RAP, respectively. Structural analysis by 'H-NMR spectroscopy shows that domains 1 and 2 as separate domains have similar secondary structures, consisting almost exclusively of a-helices, whereas domain 3 as a separate domain appears only to be marginally stable. Ligand competition titration of recombinant RAP domains 1, 2 and 3 and double domains 1 +2 and 2+ 3 against '"1-RAP and 'ZSI-a,M* (methylamine-activated a,M) for binding to a,MR/LRP demonstrated (a) that functional integrity in single domains is largely preserved, and (b) that important determinants for the inhibition of test ligands reside in the C-terminal regions of domains 1 and 3.