Soil phosphorus drives food production that is needed to feed a growing global population. However, knowledge of plant available phosphorus stocks at a global scale is poor but needed to better match phosphorus fertiliser supply to crop demand. We collated, checked, converted, and filtered a database of c. 575,000 soil samples to c. 33,000 soil samples of soil Olsen phosphorus concentrations. These data represent the most up-to-date repository of freely available data for plant available phosphorus at a global scale. We used these data to derive a model (R2 = 0.54) of topsoil Olsen phosphorus concentrations that when combined with data on bulk density predicted the distribution and global stock of soil Olsen phosphorus. We expect that these data can be used to not only show where plant available P should be boosted, but also where it can be drawn down to make more efficient use of fertiliser phosphorus and to minimise likely phosphorus loss and degradation of water quality.
periphyton (viz. algal) growth in many freshwater systems is associated with severe eutrophication that can impair productive and recreational use of water by billions of people. However, there has been limited analysis of periphyton growth at a global level. to predict where nutrient over-enrichment and undesirable periphyton growth occurs, we combined several databases to model and map global dissolved and total nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, climatic and catchment characteristics for up to 1406 larger rivers that were analysed between 1990 and 2016. We predict that 31% of the global landmass contained catchments may exhibit undesirable levels of periphyton growth. Almost three-quarters (76%) of undesirable periphyton growth was caused by P-enrichment and mapped to catchments dominated by agricultural land in North and South America and Europe containing 1.7B people. In contrast, undesirable periphyton growth due to N-enrichment was mapped to parts of North Africa and parts of the Middle East and India affecting 280 M people. The findings of this global modelling approach can be used by landowners and policy makers to better target investment and actions at finer spatial scales to remediate poor water quality owing to periphyton growth. Periphyton contains a broad range of algae, cyanobacteria, heterotrophic microbes, and detritus that grows on the beds of streams and rivers. Some species of cyanobacterial algae can be toxic, while the excessive growth and subsequent death and decay of toxic and non-toxic species can deplete oxygen, clog the hyporheic zone and alter pH 1. These changes can impair the reproductive capacity or even kill fish and bottom-dwelling animals, taint potable water supply and reduce the aesthetic and recreational quality of streams and rivers 2. These effects, commonly termed eutrophication, put aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem function at risk and globally, cost billions of dollars annually to remediate 3,4. To target efforts to remediate periphyton growth, information is required on where periphyton grows, how much grows, is the level of growth acceptable and what controls growth. This information is commonly available at a site or catchment-scale, but seldom available at a regional or national scale. To our knowledge, no global analysis exists. The controlling factors important in periphyton growth include light, temperature, flow rates and nutrient concentrations and bioavailability 5-8. In most streams and rivers, little can be done about altering light, temperature or flow rates to minimise periphyton growth, therefore most attention focuses the relative concentrations and bioavailability of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), although in some system carbon may also be important 9,10. The ratio of N to P has been found to limit growth, not only in periphyton but also in microbes and terrestrial fauna and freshwater algae 11,12. Originally described as a molar ratio of carbon (C), N and P of 106:16:1 13 , in marine phytoplankton, the ratio reduces to N and P in freshw...
The build-up of soil phosphorus (P) beyond plant requirements can lead to a longterm legacy of P losses that could impair surface water quality. Using a database of ∼4,50,000 samples collected from 2001-2015 we report the level of soil P enrichment by soil type, land use and region and the time it would take for Olsen P to decline to agronomic targets (20-0 mg L −1 ) if P fertilizer was stopped. We also modeled the time it would take for water extractable P (WEP), an indicator of P losses in surface runoff, to decline to an environmental target (0.02 mg L −1 ). Some 63% of the samples were enriched beyond agronomic targets. The area-weighted median time to reach the agronomic target was predicted to occur within a year for 75% of samples but varied up to 11.8 years in some land uses. However, the area-weighted time to reach an environmental target was 26-55 years for the 50th and 75th percentile of areas. This indicates that while an agronomic target can be easily met, additional strategies other than stopping P fertilizer inputs are required to meet an environmental target.
The enrichment of phosphorus (P) in streams and rivers can impair water quality, but concentrations have decreased. We found little evidence that this improvement was caused by a decrease in soil Olsen P concentrations or imported P (e.g. fertiliser), a change to low water-soluble P fertilisers, or that greater nitrate loads were assimilating P from groundwater or sediments. Possible causes of improvement were that land use change had decreased erosion, more nitrogen fertiliser use was assimilating soil P, and a greater awareness of P as an environmental issue. However, the most probable causes were that strategies were mitigating P loss from land, guidelines were directing where to best use strategies, and policy instruments were including P management. These findings support the development and implementation of mitigations, supported by voluntary guidelines and regulation. However, our findings can be strengthened if data are referenced to equivalent, and finer spatial and temporal scales.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.