Benthic species assemblages in upstream and downstream ends of riffles and in pools were investigated seasonally in the first five orders of an alluvial gravel stream with distinct pool and riffle channel form. Riffles comprised < 10% of stream area and were separated by pools with extensive bedrock substrate (ca. 15-85% of total surface area) which was scoured during periodic high flow. Virtually all taxa were more abundant in riffles than in pools, except chironomids which were more equally distributed. Inconsistent results were obtained for upstream-downstream comparisons within riffles. Intermittent headwater reaches (orders 1 & 2) which supported half as many taxa retained this pattern during periods of flow, although riffles at these sites were dry from mid-June to mid-November. Pools which contained more gravel, indicating less disturbance during high flow, had a richer assemblage of benthic species than other pools. Many invertebrates in pools may have been there as a result of drift from their preferred riffle habitats, but the presence of gravel in the pools indicates less intense flow disturbance during floods, provides protection from the mild scouring that does occur during floods, and provides refugia from predators.
A system is proposed to classify running water habitats based on their channel form which can be considered in three different sedimentological settings: a cobble and boulder bed channel, a gravel bed channel, or a sand bed channel. Three physical factors (relief, lithology, and runoff) are selected as state factors that control all other interacting parameters associated with channel form. When these factors are integrated across the conterminous United States, seven distinct stream regions are evident, each representing a most probable succession of channel forms downstream from the headwaters to the mouth. Coupling these different channel profiles with typical biotic community structures usually associated with each of the channel types should result in considerable refinement of the applicability of the River Continuum Concept and other holistic ecosystem models by realizing the nonrandomness of the effects of geomorphology on stream ecosystems. Thus, this regional perspective of streams should serve to make persons concerned with water resources more aware of the geographical considerations that affect their study areas. (KEY TERMS: alluvial; channel form; fluvial geomorphology; stream ecosystems.)
An Ozark Plateau stream was studied to determine the influence of distinct pool and riffle geomorphology on the longitudinal zonation of macroinvertebrate species assemblages and functional group classification. All study sites were dominated by alluvial pool and riffle channel form and the first two orders became intermittent during summer months. Nine benthos samples were collected seasonally from riffles and pools at each of five sites using a vacuum benthos sampler. Diel temperature pulse and coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) were measured at each site also. Water temperature was most variable in second order, and CPOM on riffles was not more abundant in upstream reaches. Annual average density and biomass of invertebrates were highest in third and fourth orders, respectively. Diversity was depressed in the intermittent headwaters sites. Macroinvertebrate functional groups did not exhibit strong longitudinal trends as predicted by the river continuum model, with species assemblages apparently more strongly affected by the segment-level physical template, although shredders were more abundant in the headwaters during fall and winter. This study indicates that a reach-level perspective based on channel form is a necessary complement to holistic stream ecosystem models, especially in alluvial gravel streams.
The vacuum benthos sampler consists of a vacuum chamber equipped with a collecting net connected to the intake of a 12 volt pump, a battery, and a standpipe. Contents of the standpipe are vacuumed while substrate is removed and washed with the exhaust hose. The vacuum chamber is designed for rapid changing of nets during replicate sampling. This sampler is equally efficient in flowing and standing water. It was more effective than a modified Hess sampler for collecting a large variety of benthos from flowing (ca 0.25 -0.75 m/s) riffles. Required operation time is variable, but 93% of invertebrates caught in 10 min were captured in the first 5 min during our tests, and there was a 94% mean recovery of released organisms during 10 min of subsequent operation. Advantages over previous suction samplers include interception of organisms before they pass through a pump, return of outlet water to the standpipe, capability of sampling in shallow (20 -30 mm) water, and that it can be carried and operated by one person.
Decomposition of leaves was compared among sites in a stream that originates deep in a cave and then emerges as a spring brook. White oak (Quercus alba) leaf packs and plastic controls were placed in four similar riffle areas:(1) in the cave above a sink hole; (2) in the cave below a sink hole; (3) in the spring under an overhang; and (4) in the spring exposed to direct sunlight (through a forest canopy). Flow, temperature, and other aspects of physical-chemical water quality were constant among sites while availability of natural leaf liter, food abundance and variety, light, and the number and types of invertebrates varied. Processing rates (-k) at the cave sites (1 = 0.0075, 2 = 0.0085) were faster than rates for white oak reported for surface streams, despite a paucity of invertebrates in the cave and similar temperatures. Leaf packs which received sunlight had ten times more invertebrates ass~ciated with them than those under the overhang, but similar processing rates (0.019 and 0.024 respectively). Because of these results, we suspect that the decomposition rates outside the cave were faster due to factors other than macroinvertebrates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.