Quantifying the relative importance of how local (environmental or niche‐based) and regional (dispersal‐related or spatial) processes regulate the assembly of communities has become one of the main research avenues of community ecology. It has been shown that the degree of isolation of local habitats in the landscape may substantially influence the relative role of environmental filtering and dispersal‐related processes in metacommunities. Dendritic stream networks are unique habitats in the landscape, where more isolated upstream sites have been predicted to be primarily structured by environmental variables, while more central mainstem rivers by both environmental and spatial variables (hereafter the network position hypothesis, NPH). However, the NPH has almost exclusively been tested for stream macroinvertebrates, and therefore its predictions warrant confirmation from multiple taxa. We examined the validity of the NPH for benthic diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish in the Pannon Ecoregion, Hungary. Following the NPH we predicted a clear dominance of environmental over spatial variables in headwaters, and a larger effect of spatial variables in rivers compared to headwaters. We tested these predictions using variance partitioning analyses separately for the different taxa in headwater and in riverine habitats. We found large differences in the explained community variance when the impact of environmental (physical and chemical) and spatial (overland and watercourse distance) variables for various taxa was studied. In general, total explained variance was lower for the more passively dispersing plant taxa than for animal taxa with more active dispersal in both streams and rivers. However, similar to other studies, the total explained variance was low for both headwater streams and rivers. Community structure of diatoms could be best explained by both environmental and spatial variables in streams, whereas their community structure could not be explained by either variable group in rivers. The significance of environmental and spatial variables depended on the distance measure (overland versus watercourse) in the case of macrophytes. Community structure of macroinvertebrates could be explained by environmental variables in streams and by both environmental and spatial variables in rivers. Moreover, variation was explained by different predictors when macroinvertebrate taxa were divided into flying and non‐flying groups, suggesting the importance of dispersal mode in explaining community variation. Finally, community structure of fishes could be explained by both environmental and spatial variables in streams and only by environmental variables in rivers. In conclusion, we found no clear evidence of the NPH in our multi‐taxa comparison. For example, while patterns in macroinvertebrate communities seem to support the NPH, those in fish communities run counter with the predictions of the NPH. This study thus shows that different taxa may behave differently to isolation effects in stream ne...

No abstract

No abstract

Closely similar species may occupy similar niches, but usually divergence can be found in one or more traits when they inhabit the same habitat. In this study, we examined how two co-occurring gammarids — the nativeGammarus fossarumand the naturalizedG. roeselii — are distributed among microhabitats, depending on their sympatric or allopatric distribution. We hypothesized that the larger body-sized species (G. roeselii), exploiting their advantages in competition, restrict smaller species to microhabitats with smaller particle sizes. Four headwaters were sampled in the Mecsek Mountains (SW Hungary) in May, July and October 2009, and 37 local scale environmental variables at each site were measured. AlthoughG. fossarumis smaller in size, significantly more individuals were collected from the more favourable lithal and biotic microhabitats, whereas a strong negative association was observed between the two species.Gammarus roeseliioccurred at sites characterized by degraded riparian vegetation, which indicates stronger anthropogenic impacts, but still has a disadvantage in competition in mountainous streams under anthropogenic influence.

The role of environmental control and spatial structuring may vary depending on dispersal mode within a metacommunity in stream systems. However, as a result of high seasonal variation in environment conditions and phenological features, there might be considerable seasonal changes in the relative importance of structuring factors. The objective of this study was (i) to determine the relative role of structuring factors for aquatic macroinvertebrates with different dispersal mode groups which have seasonal variation in their dispersal capacity and (ii) to disentangle seasonal changes in metacommunity structuring. We sampled 50 stream sites of the Middle Danube Basin (Hungary) in spring and summer. We compared Distance-Decay Relationships between communities of different dispersal groups and distance measures, and then we used variation partitioning analysis and Moran's eigenvector maps based on overland and watercourse distances to reveal structuring processes in both seasons. We found that metacommunities of all dispersal groups were influenced in both seasons mainly by environmental factors with additional impacts of the spatial components. Our findings suggest that metacommunities of taxa with temporally stable dispersal capacity have seasonally stable structuring processes, while the relative importance of structuring factors can vary seasonally in groups with seasonally changing dispersal capacity.