The 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission (DP) was measured in 20 normal hearing subjects and 15 patients with moderate cochlear hearing loss and compared to the pure-tone hearing threshold, measured with the same probe system at the f2 frequencies. DPs were elicited over a wide primary tone level range between L2 = 20 and 65 dB SPL. With decreasing L2, the L1-L2 primary tone level difference was continuously increased according to L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 dB, to account for differences of the primary tone responses at the f2 place. Above 1.5 kHz, DPs were measurable with that paradigm on average within 10 dB of the average hearing threshold in both subject groups. The growth of the DP was compressive in normal hearing subjects, with strong saturation at moderate primary tone levels. In cases of cochlear impairment, reductions of the DP level were greatest at lowest, but smallest at highest stimulus levels, such that the growth of the DP became linearized. The correlation of the DP level to the hearing threshold was found to depend on the stimulus level. Maximal correlations were found in impaired ears at moderate primary tone levels around L2 = 45 dB SPL, but at lowest stimulus levels in normal hearing (L2 = 25 dB SPL). At these levels, 17/20 impaired ears and 14/15 normally hearing ears showed statistically significant correlations. It is concluded that for a clinical application and prediction of the hearing threshold, DPs should be measured not only at high, but also at lower primary tone levels.
The suppression tuning properties of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) were measured in 16 ears of normally hearing human subjects. DPOAE were elicited by fixed, low-level primary tones in four frequency regions with the second primary tone frequency f2 at 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz. For various suppressor frequencies, suppression of the DPOAE was measured as a function of the suppressor tone level, enabling the assessment of the threshold and the growth of suppression. Depending on the distance of the suppressor tone to f2, there were marked differences in the suppression behavior of different suppressor frequencies. The threshold of suppression was minimal slightly above f2 and hardly increased with increasing frequency, but increased continuously with decreasing suppressor frequency. The growth of suppression, however, did not systematically change below f2, but decreased rapidly above f2. Both changes resulted in asymmetrical, V-shaped suppression tuning curves. They were sharply tuned to a frequency slightly above f2, with Q10 dB values up to 7.87. This is consistent with the assumption that the main source of the DPOAE is at the f2 site. In some cases, the DPOAE was particularly sensitive to suppressor tones near the DPOAE frequency. In one individual case, facilitation was found for corresponding frequency-level ranges of the suppressor tone. This may suggest a secondary emission source at the distortion product place.
High-resolution hearing threshold and 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission (DP) were measured with the same in-the-ear sound probe and same calibration at 51 frequencies between 500 and 8000 Hz in 39 sensorineural hearing loss ears associated with tinnitus. Using a primary tone setting L1 = 0.4L2 + 39 that accounts for the nonlinear interaction of the two primary tones at the DP generation site at f2, DPs were elicited in a wide range from L2 = 65 to 20 dB SPL. We failed to find a uniform DP behavior in the 39 tinnitus ears tested. Seventeen of them behaved like impaired ears without tinnitus. In these ears a linearized DP growth was observed where the DP level decreased and the slope of the DP I/O functions steepened with increasing hearing loss and as a result both the DP level and the DP slope strongly correlated with hearing threshold. The other population, 22 tinnitus ears, exhibited a poor or even inverse relationship between DP level and hearing threshold, i.e., displayed an increase of DP level with increasing hearing loss. Despite the severe hearing loss but due to the high level, DPs could be recorded well in the frequency range that corresponded to the appearance of the tinnitus. The DP slope, however, increased with increasing hearing loss and, therefore, did still correlate with hearing threshold revealing pathological alteration. The data suggest that the DP level alone is hardly capable of assessing hearing impairment in tinnitus ears and may even be misleading. Thus just the DP slope seems to be the only reliable indicator of cochlear malfunction around the tinnitus frequency. The observed nonuniform DP behavior suggests different cochlear impairments in tinnitus ears. In those ears where the DP level decreases and the slope of the I/O functions increases with hearing loss, cochlear sensitivity and tuning are supposed to be diminished. In those ears where the DP level increases with increasing hearing loss, a reinforced mechanical distortion is hypothetized to be generated by cochlear hyperactivity that can be the source of both the abnormally high DP level and the tinnitus.
The evaluation of diagnostics and therapies includes more and more subjective, i.e. emotional and social aspects. Focussing on the handicap experienced by dysphonic patients, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) has previously been found to be of significant clinical and scientific value for different voices. In this study the VHI questionnaire was applied to demonstrate the voice handicap of 20 male laryngectomees using tracheoesophageal voice (Provox®), aged 65.5 ± 8.7 years. Their VHI was 45.5 ± 24.1, which was significantly higher than the score of patients with functional voice disorders, but differed only slightly from patients with organic laryngeal dysphonia. Focussing on individual data, VHI scores ranged from values similar to persons without voice disorder to maximum handicap of 101. Comparing the VHI scores with the laryngectomees’ gradual self-perception of voice disorder severity, no consistent relationship was found. Considering the large interindividual differences, the VHI may serve as a valuable instrument for the assessment of individual interventional needs rather than for the identification of a general laryngectomees’ handicap.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.