No abstract

High-concentration (>100 g/L) solutions of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are typically characterized by anomalously large solution viscosity and shear thinning behavior for strain rates ≥10 3 s −1 . Here, the link between protein−protein interactions (PPIs) and the rheology of concentrated solutions of COE-03 and COE-19 mAbs is studied by means of static and dynamic light scattering and microfluidic rheometry. By comparing the experimental data with predictions based on the Baxter sticky hard-sphere model, we surprisingly find a connection between the observed shear thinning and the predicted percolation threshold. The longest shear relaxation time of mAbs was much larger than that of model sticky hard spheres within the same region of the phase diagram, which is attributed to the anisotropy of the mAb PPIs. Our results suggest that not only the strength but also the patchiness of short-range attractive PPIs should be explicitly accounted for by theoretical approaches aimed at predicting the shear rate-dependent viscosity of dense mAb solutions.

Vibrio cholerae chromosome 2 (Chr2) requires its own ParABS system for segregation. Without it, V. cholerae becomes nonviable and loses pathogenicity. ParA2 of Chr2 is a Walker-type ATPase that is the main driver of Chr2 segregation. Most of our understanding of ParA function comes from studying plasmid partition systems. How ParA provides the motive force in segregation of chromosomes, which are much larger than plasmids, is less understood and different models have been proposed. Here we analyzed in vivo behavior and kinetic properties of ParA2 using cell imaging, biochemical and biophysical approaches. ParA2 formed an asymmetric gradient in the cell that localized dynamically in the cell cycle. We found that ParA2 dimers bind ATP and undergo a slow conformational change to an active DNA-binding state, similar to P1 ParA. The presence of DNA catalyzes ParA2 conformational change to allow cooperative binding of active ParA2 dimers to form higher-order oligomers on DNA. Nucleotide exchange rates were also slow, thus providing a control of ParA2 recruitment and dynamic localizations. Although highly conserved in biochemical properties, ParA2 showed faster overall ATP cycling and DNA-rebinding rates than plasmid ParAs, suggesting that this could be shared kinetic features among chromosomal ParAs to regulate the transport of a much larger DNA cargo.

Dynamic protein gradients are exploited for the spatial organization and segregation of replicated chromosomes. However, mechanisms of protein gradient formation and how that spatially organizes chromosomes remain poorly understood. Here, we have determined the kinetic principles of subcellular localizations of ParA2 ATPase, an essential spatial regulator of chromosome 2 segregation in the multichromosome bacterium, Vibrio cholerae. We found that ParA2 gradients self-organize in V. cholerae cells into dynamic pole-to-pole oscillations. We examined the ParA2 ATPase cycle and ParA2 interactions with ParB2 and DNA. In vitro, ParA2-ATP dimers undergo a rate-limiting conformational switch, catalysed by DNA to achieve DNA-binding competence. This active ParA2 state loads onto DNA cooperatively as higher order oligomers. Our results indicate that the midcell localization of ParB2-parS2 complexes stimulate ATP hydrolysis and ParA2 release from the nucleoid, generating an asymmetric ParA2 gradient with maximal concentration toward the poles. This rapid dissociation coupled with slow nucleotide exchange and conformational switch provides for a temporal lag that allows the redistribution of ParA2 to the opposite pole for nucleoid reattachment. Based on our data, we propose a ‘Tug-of-war’ model that uses dynamic oscillations of ParA2 to spatially regulate symmetric segregation and positioning of bacterial chromosomes.

Unlike a number of amyloid-forming proteins, stefins, and in particular stefin B (cystatin B) form amyloids under conditions where the native state predominates. In order to trigger oligomerization processes, the stability of the protein needs to be compromised, favoring structural re-arrangement however, accelerating fibril formation is not a simple function of protein stability. We report here on how optimal conditions for amyloid formation lead to the destabilization of dimeric and tetrameric states of the protein in favor of the monomer. Small, highly localized structural changes can be mapped out that allow us to visualize directly areas of the protein which eventually become responsible for triggering amyloid formation. These regions of the protein overlap with the Cu (II)-binding sites which we identify here for the first time. We hypothesize that in vivo modulators of amyloid formation may act similarly to painstakingly optimized solvent conditions developed in vitro. We discuss these data in the light of current structural models of stefin B amyloid fibrils based on H-exchange data, where the detachment of the helical part and the extension of loops were observed.