A total of 3500 LURIC baseline measurements were performed in 3316 individuals between July 1997 and January 2000. The baseline examination was repeated within a median of 35 days in 5% of study participants (n = 166, including a third examination in 18 after a median of 69 days) for pharmacogenomic assessment of lipid-lowering therapy and for quality control purposes. A five-year follow-up on major clinical events (death, any cardiovascular event including MI, stroke and revascularisation, malignancy and any hospitalisation) is ongoing. The clinical phenotypes prevalent at baseline in the cohort of 2309 men (70%) with a mean age of 62 +/- 11 years and 1007 women (30%), mean age 65 +/- 10 years, were angiographically-documented CAD in 2567 (79%), MI in 1368 (41%), dyslipidaemia in 2050 (62%) with hypercholesterolaemia > or = 240 mg/dl (27%), hypertriglyceridaemia > or = 150 mg/dl (44%) and HDL-cholesterol < or = 35 mg/dl (38%) in individuals not treated with lipid-lowering agents, systemic hypertension in 1921 (58%), metabolic syndrome in 1591 (48%), Type 2 diabetes in 1063 (32%) and obesity defined by body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2 in 770 (23%). Control patients in whom CAD had been ruled out angiographically were five years younger than those with CAD (59 +/- 12 and 64 +/- 10 years, respectively; p < 0.001), twice as often females (48% compared to 25% females in the CAD group, p < 0.001) and had significantly less cardiovascular risk factors than individuals with CAD. The prevalence of specific cardiovascular risk subsets in LURIC, such as the elderly (> or = 75 years), was 375 (11%), while 213 (6%) were young adults (< 45 years) and 904 (27%) were postmenopausal women (90% of all females). A low risk status (< or = 1 out of the four traditional risk factors: dyslipidaemia, smoking, hypertension and diabetes mellitus) was identified in 314 (9%) individuals of the entire cohort (5% in CAD and 26% in controls, p < 0.001) and 97 (3%) carried none of the four risk factors (1% in CAD and 9% in controls, p < 0.001). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

SummaryThe solvent/detergent (SD) process used for plasma can safely inactivate all lipid-enveloped viruses. The introduction of a specific prion-binding ligand gel in combination with SD treatment, time-reduced from 4 to 1-1.5 h, still ensures efficient virus kill, reduces abnormal prion protein by >5 log steps, and preserves levels of plasmin inhibitor at close to the reference range. Infections with known nonenveloped viruses such as HAV or parvovirus B19 are prevented by ensuring low virus loads in the starting plasma units, dilution through pooling of single plasma units, and neutralization of immune antibodies already present in the initial plasma pools. The major advantages of SD plasma over fresh frozen plasma and the other pathogen-inactivated plasmas are its extreme safety with respect to transfusion-related acute lung injury and the significantly lower likelihood of provoking allergic reactions. Both advantages are best interpreted as results of the dilution effect of pooling. No fewer than 18 clinical studies covering all indications for plasma, and extensive clinical experience have shown that reduced levels of coagulation factors and inhibitors as a result of SD treatment do not impair significantly the clinical efficacy or tolerance of plasma. Properly standardized clotting factor and inhibitor potencies and low batch-to-batch variations when compared with single-donor plasma units makes SD plasma more suitable for standardized treatment. Schlüsselwörter

We investigated the relationship between factor XIII, fibrinogen, blood coagulation screening tests and postoperative bleeding in 98 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. All patients received aprotinin. Blood samples were collected preoperatively (T1),after termination of CPB (T2),12 h (T3) and 24 h (T4) after surgery to determine FXIII activity, fibrinogen, platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and D-dimers (DD). Laboratory results were correlated with the chest tube drainage 24 h after surgery and compared between patients with 24-hour chest tube drain volumes in the lower (Group 1) with those in the upper tertile (Group 3). Median FXIII and fibrinogen levels dropped by 33.9% and 34.2%, respectively, during CPB. No association between FXIII activity and the extent of postoperative bleeding was found. However, chest tube bleeding was significantly correlated with preoperative and postoperative fibrinogen. This was confirmed by comparing Groups 1 and 3. Group 3 patients had significantly lower fibrinogen levels than Group 1 at T1 - T4, although most fibrinogen values were within or above the reference range (medians, g/l: 3.5 vs. 4.0, p = 0.043 at T1; 2.3 vs. 2.7, p = 0.015 at T2; 2.9 vs. 3.3, p = 0.008 at T3; 4.2 vs. 5.2, p = 0.002 at T4). There was also a significant relationship of platelet count, PT and APTT, as measured after CPB (T2), with postoperative chest tube drainage. In conclusion, plasma FXIII activity does not influence postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing CPB surgery. There is however an inverse association between preoperative or postoperative plasma fibrinogen levels and postoperative bleeding. These findings indicate a modulation of postoperative bleeding by fibrinogen levels.

We investigated the relationship between impedance platelet aggregometry (IPA) as measured by the Multiplate system and turbidimetric platelet aggregation (TPA) induced by ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), and collagen; blood cell counts; platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) closure times (CT), and von Willebrand factor (VWF) in 120 well-characterized healthy individuals. Pre-analytical and analytical conditions were standardized comprehensively. Analytical reliability of IPA and TPA and the influence of pre-analytical variables on assay results were also examined. IPA and TPA did not change significantly between 0.5 and 5 hours after blood collection when samples were stored at room temperature. TPA and IPA showed significantly greater intra-assay imprecision than respective TPA induced by the same agonists. Intra-individual variation did not differ significantly between IPA and TPA. The lower limits of reference range (2.5th percentiles) of AAIPA, ADPIPA and collagen IPA determined AM were 37, 20 and 40 AU, respectively. ADPIPA showed significantly lower maximum aggregation values than AAIPA and collagen IPA (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in any parameter between males and females. No significant differences between blood group 0 and non-0 individuals were noted with respect to IPA and TPA. IPA did not change significantly during the day. In contrast, TPA measured PM was significantly lower than corresponding values determined a.m. (p < 0.0001). CEPI-CT, CADP-CT and leukocyte counts increased significantly from a.m. to p.m. (P = 0.008 and P > 0.0001, respectively). Donors had significantly greater IPA induced by any agonist than non-donors (P-values < 0.0001, 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively), whereas TPA was not significantly different between donors and non-donors. IPA did not correlate significantly with TPA nor with PFA-100 CT. ADPIPA and collagen IPA correlated significantly with platelet count. TPA was not associated with platelet count. An inverse significant correlation was observed between TPA induced by any agonist and leukocyte count, whereas leukocyte count did not influence IPA. CEPI-CT and CADP-CT correlated significantly with VWF:CBA and with each other but not with TPA. We concluded that IPA and TPA measure different aspects of platelet function. IPA results reflect interactions between platelets, red and white cells, while TPA does not. This explains discrepancies in associations of IPA and TPA with cell counts, time of day and blood donation. The clinical significance of IPA determined using the Multiplate device remains to be determined in studies on patients with platelet dysfunction and under treatment with antiplatelet agents.

Future research should seek to optimize the composition of solvent/detergent-treated plasma. Prospective trials and prospective hemovigilance studies are required to determine the rate of adverse events occurring after treatment with solvent/detergent-treated plasma and other types of therapeutic plasma.

Pathogen reduction (PR) systems for platelets, based on chemically induced cross-linking and inactivation of nucleic acids, potentially prevent transfusion transmission of infectious agents, but can increase clinically significant bleeding in some clinical studies. Here, we documented the effects of PR systems on microRNA and mRNA levels of platelets stored in the blood bank, and assessed their impact on platelet activation and function. Unlike platelets subjected to gamma irradiation or stored in additive solution, platelets treated with Intercept (amotosalen + ultraviolet-A [UVA] light) exhibited significantly reduced levels of 6 of the 11 microRNAs, and 2 of the 3 anti-apoptotic mRNAs (Bcl-xl and Clusterin) that we monitored, compared with platelets stored in plasma. Mirasol (riboflavin + UVB light) treatment of platelets did not produce these effects. PR neither affected platelet microRNA synthesis or function nor induced cross-linking of microRNA-sized endogenous platelet RNA species. However, the reduction in the platelet microRNA levels induced by Intercept correlated with the platelet activation (p < 0.05) and an impaired platelet aggregation response to ADP (p < 0.05). These results suggest that Intercept treatment may induce platelet activation, resulting in the release of microRNAs and mRNAs from platelets. The clinical implications of this reduction in platelet nucleic acids secondary to Intercept remain to be established.

There are no critical reductions of the activities of clotting factors, inhibitors, and other important plasma proteins due to S/D treatment. Efficacy and safety of S/D plasma is not hampered by reduced activities of protein S and plasmin inhibitor. Dosage calculation and the evaluation of clinical response is simplified by usage of the more standardized S/D plasma compared to QFFP.

Long-term intensive donor plasmapheresis under conditions investigated in this study is safe. All donors weighing > or = 70 kg are safely able to donate 850 ml of plasma in each session up to 60 times per year, provided that they are carefully monitored.