ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyse the clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis (AP) in a prospectively collected, large, multicentre cohort and to validate the major recommendations in the IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of AP.DesignEighty-six different clinical parameters were collected using an electronic clinical research form designed by the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group.Patients600 adult patients diagnosed with AP were prospectively enrolled from 17 Hungarian centres over a two-year period from 1 January 2013.Main ResultsWith respect to aetiology, biliary and alcoholic pancreatitis represented the two most common forms of AP. The prevalence of biliary AP was higher in women, whereas alcoholic AP was more common in men. Hyperlipidaemia was a risk factor for severity, lack of serum enzyme elevation posed a risk for severe AP, and lack of abdominal pain at admission demonstrated a risk for mortality. Abdominal tenderness developed in all the patients with severe AP, while lack of abdominal tenderness was a favourable sign for mortality. Importantly, lung injury at admission was associated with mortality. With regard to laboratory parameters, white blood cell count and CRP were the two most sensitive indicators for severe AP. The most common local complication was peripancreatic fluid, whereas the most common distant organ failure in severe AP was lung injury. Deviation from the recommendations in the IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines on fluid replacement, enteral nutrition and timing of interventions increased severity and mortality.ConclusionsAnalysis of a large, nationwide, prospective cohort of AP cases allowed for the identification of important determinants of severity and mortality. Evidence-based guidelines should be observed rigorously to improve outcomes in AP.

BackgroundSepsis is usually accompanied by changes of body temperature (Tb), but whether fever and hypothermia predict mortality equally or differently is not fully clarified. We aimed to find an association between Tb and mortality in septic patients with meta-analysis of clinical trials.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry databases (from inception to February 2016). Human studies reporting Tb and mortality of patients with sepsis were included in the analyses. Average Tb with SEM and mortality rate of septic patient groups were extracted by two authors independently.ResultsForty-two studies reported Tb and mortality ratios in septic patients (n = 10,834). Pearson correlation analysis revealed weak negative linear correlation (R2 = 0.2794) between Tb and mortality. With forest plot analysis, we found a 22.2% (CI, 19.2–25.5) mortality rate in septic patients with fever (Tb > 38.0°C), which was higher, 31.2% (CI, 25.7–37.3), in normothermic patients, and it was the highest, 47.3% (CI, 38.9–55.7), in hypothermic patients (Tb < 36.0°C). Meta-regression analysis showed strong negative linear correlation between Tb and mortality rate (regression coefficient: -0.4318; P < 0.001). Mean Tb of the patients was higher in the lowest mortality quartile than in the highest: 38.1°C (CI, 37.9–38.4) vs 37.1°C (CI, 36.7–37.4).ConclusionsDeep Tb shows negative correlation with the clinical outcome in sepsis. Fever predicts lower, while hypothermia higher mortality rates compared with normal Tb. Septic patients with the lowest (< 25%) chance of mortality have higher Tb than those with the highest chance (> 75%).

No abstract

adverse effects may occur with the use of metformin 8. Alternatively, the potential role of modifications in the gut microbiome had been explored as a new complementary therapeutic strategy 9. Clinical evidence supports the hypothesis that the modulation of the gut microbiota by probiotics could be effective in prevention and management of diabetes 10,11. Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. The healthy human body contains such microbes physiologically; and they can be obtained in forms of over-the-counter food supplements as well. Over the last few years, probiotics, especially the lactobacillus species were shown to be effective in the therapy of type 2 diabetes 12. In type 2 diabetes, gut microbiome is found to be different from that in the healthy population. In a human study, the amount of Firmicutes bacteria was lower, whereas the number of Bacteroides and Proteobacteria is higher in the gastrointestinal tract of patients with type 2 diabetes compared to non-diabetic persons 13. According to the study 13 , the ratio of Bacteriodes and Firmicutes species had positive correlation with decreased insulin resistance, however, causality has not been proven yet. Following innovative dietary strategies, it seems possible to maintain euglycemia by normalizing the altered microbiome, and to prevent long-term micro-and macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes 9. Although, there have been numerous bacterial species investigated in the therapy of type 2 diabetes, no consensus has been obtained regarding the effectivity and the most effective species. For instance, an earlier meta-analysis suggested, that the intake of certain Lactobacillus species, such as L. fermentum, L. ingluviei and L. acidophilus can lead to weight gain, while the ingestion of L. gasseri and L. plantarum might end up in weight loss both in animal and human studies 14. Previous meta-analysis in this field were not conducted with assessment of the evidence quality levels and the number of identified trials that met their inclusion criteria was relatively low (7-12 trials) 15-19. Two meta-analysis found no significant effects of probiotics on lipid profile 16,19 and two meta-analysis found decreased indexes of lipid profiles 17,18. These contradictory reports on the effect of probiotics inspired us to conduct an updated meta-analysis to assess the effect of probiotic therapies in diabetes mellitus type 2 exclusively from randomized controlled trials. Materials and methods Protocol and registration. This meta-analysis was reported according to the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines 20. Pre-specified protocol of this meta-analysis was published in the Prospero Center for Reviews and Dissemination (PROSPERO) under the registration number of CRD42019137997.

Despite the growing knowledge of the clinicopathological features of COVID-19, the correlation between early changes in the laboratory parameters and the clinical outcomes of patients is not entirely understood. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic value of early laboratory parameters in COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the available literature in five databases. The last search was on July 26, 2020, with key terms related to COVID-19. Eligible studies contained original data of at least ten infected patients and reported on baseline laboratory parameters of patients. We calculated weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. 93 and 78 studies were included in quantitative and qualitative syntheses, respectively. Higher baseline total white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate-dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), D-dimer and lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) (WMDALC = − 0.35 × 109/L [CI − 0.43, − 0.27], p < 0.001, I2 = 94.2%; < 0.8 × 109/L, ORALC = 3.74 [CI 1.77, 7.92], p = 0.001, I2 = 65.5%) were all associated with higher mortality rate. On admission WBC, ALC, D-dimer, CRP, LDH, and CK changes could serve as alarming prognostic factors. The correct interpretation of laboratory abnormalities can guide therapeutic decisions, especially in early identification of potentially critical cases. This meta-analysis should help to allocate resources and save lives by enabling timely intervention.

Dear Editor, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with a mortality rate of 3-7% [1]. The high mortality results from fulminant pneumonia leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure [2, 3]. Initial reports suggest that comorbidities cause a more severe course of infection and a poorer prognosis [4, 5]. Considering the fast spread and high mortality of COVID-19, it is necessary to understand the possible risk factors affecting its progression. We aimed to perform a systematic search to evaluate the potential role of all reported comorbidities on the disease course. Details of our report are provided in Supplementary file 1. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus between 01/01/2020 and 05/11/2020. The main outcomes were mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and severity. Definitions of the investigated outcomes are available in Supplementary file 2, Table 2. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to objectify the association between comorbidities and the outcomes by the random-effects model. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020176781). Of 33,987 records screened, 61 cohort studies with 31,089 (median 162; IQR: 103-338) patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mortality rate was 10.0%, 19.9% of patients needed intensive, while the reported severity was 24.0%. Underlying chronic

BackgroundMetformin is the first-choice drug for patients with Type 2 diabetes, and this therapy is characterized by being weight neutral. However, in the elderly an additional unintentional weight loss could be considered as an adverse effect of the treatment.ObjectivesWe aimed to perform a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies investigating the body weight changes upon metformin treatment in participants older than 60 years.Materials and methodsPubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched. We included at least 12 week-long studies with placebo control where the mean age of the metformin-treated patients was 60 years or older and the body weight changes of the patients were reported. We registered our protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42017055287).ResultsFrom the 971 articles identified by the search, 6 randomized placebo-controlled studies (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis (n = 1541 participants). A raw difference of -2.23 kg (95% CI: -2.84 –-1.62 kg) body weight change was detected in the metformin-treated groups as compared with that of the placebo groups (p<0.001). Both total cholesterol (-0.184 mmol/L, p<0.001) and LDL cholesterol levels (-0.182 mmol/L, p<0.001) decreased upon metformin-treatment.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis of RCTs showed a small reduction of body weight together with slight improvement of the blood lipid profile in patients over 60 years. With regard to the risk of unintentional weight loss, metformin seems to be a safe agent in the population of over 60 years. Our results also suggest that metformin treatment may reduce the risk of major coronary events (-4-5%) and all-cause mortality (-2%) in elderly diabetic populations.

Introduction: We aimed to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2 irrigants routinely used in root canal therapy of permanent teeth. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials published until March 2020. The meta-analysis of relative risk (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) was performed using a random effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis was performed for culture and molecular methods of bacterial detection. Results: The literature search yielded 2110 records without duplicates. Eight studies were eligible for a systematic review. No significant differences in the incidence of samples with positive bacterial growth after irrigation (RR 5 1.003; 95% CI, 0.729-1.380; P 5 .987) and mean bacterial number changes (SMD 5 0.311; 95% CI, 20.368 to 0.991; P 5 .369) were observed between CHX and NaOCl in the culture and molecular subgroups. Heterogeneity in RR (I 2 5 0.000%, P 5 .673) was low among studies, whereas considerable heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of SMD (I 2 5 76.336%, P 5 .005). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that both CHX and NaOCl irrigation can reduce bacterial infections without any significant difference in antimicrobial efficacy between them, despite their difference in molecular mechanisms. Therefore, each can be used as the main antibacterial root canal irrigant. However, our results were limited by inconsistencies among retrieved articles and a lack of clinically relevant outcomes. Further well-designed clinical studies are warranted to supplement our results.