Background-Cardiac resynchronization therapy was shown to reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, the prediction of benefit is controversial. We aimed to investigate predictive factors of LV functional recovery and reversed remodeling after biventricular pacing. Methods and Results-Forty-nine consecutive patients with CHF and a wide QRS complex (182Ϯ32 ms) were studied by echocardiography before resynchronization. Intraventricular and interventricular asynchrony and their combination were assessed by pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging from measurements of regional electromechanical coupling times in basal segments of the right and left ventricle. At 6-month follow-up, responders were defined by a relative increase in LV ejection fraction Ն25% compared with baseline (nϭ27). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed the degree of intraventricular asynchrony (area under the curveϭ0.77), interventricular asynchrony (area under the curveϭ0.69), and their combination (area under the curveϭ0.84) as the best predictors of functional recovery after resynchronization. In addition, the degree of intraventricular and interventricular asynchrony correlated significantly with the improvement of LV ejection fraction (rϭ0.

In high-risk patients with BS, primary prophylactic ICD therapy is an effective treatment. In this, young and otherwise healthy patient population, the IS rate is high.

In HF patients with electromechanical cardiac dyssynchrony, functional improvement related to CRT is associated with favorable changes in established molecular markers of HF, including genes that regulate contractile function and pathologic hypertrophy.

Inducibility of sustained ventricular arrhythmias is a good predictor of outcome in Brugada syndrome. In asymptomatic individuals, a prolonged H-V interval during sinus rhythm is associated with a higher risk of developing arrhythmic events during follow-up. Symptomatic patients require protective treatment even when they are not inducible. Asymptomatic patients can be reassured if they are noninducible.

Two hundred thirty-five patients underwent RF catheter ablation of AV conduction for symptomatic drug refractory AF (84%), atrial flutter (9%), and atrial tachycardia (7%). In the first 100 patients, postablation pacing was not prospectively set at any specific rate and was always < or = 70 beats/min. In the next 135 patients, postablation pacing was prospectively set at 90 beats/min for 1-3 months. Six of the first 100 patients (6%) had VF or sudden death after the RF procedure and none (0%) of the next 135 patients did (P < 0.05). One of the six patients had recurrent VF 4 days after the ablation. Five patients were successfully resuscitated and one patient died. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with and without (aborted) sudden death or between the first 100 and the next 135 patients with respect to age, sex, underlying heart disease, EF, number of RF applications, or left-or right-sided approach of the procedure. VF mostly occurred during episodes of slow ventricular escape rhythms or during slow ventricular pacing. We conclude that malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death are possible complications of RF ablation of the AV function. The mechanism of these complications could have a bradycardia dependent nature and it seems that the occurrence of malignant arrhythmias can be prevented by temporarily pacing the heart at relatively fast rates immediately after ablation.