This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version.
Permanent repository link:http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/3801/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1748499512000012 Copyright and reuse: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. is the row parameter in accident year i (related to the exposure of accident year i) and γ j is the column parameter for development period j (related to the runoff pattern), and to apply prior distributions to these parameters. We will assume that there is no prior knowledge about the runoff parameters, and we use non-informative prior distributions for γ j . By assuming informative prior distributions for the µ i 's we can incorporate external knowledge about the ultimate losses. We investigate a number of different formulations of these informative prior distributions, and examine the properties of the resulting posterior estimators. We also compare our results with the traditional BF method.An important observation will be that although we choose non-informative prior distributions for the parameters, their shapes may have a significant influence on the resulting claims reserves.Organization of the paper. In the remainder of this section we define the general Bayesian ODP Model and we discuss prediction in a Bayesian framework. In Sections 2 and 3 we then specify two different types of prior distributions (the uniform prior model with log link function and the gamma prior model). Parameter estimates, e.g. for γ j , are always denoted by γ j in the uniform prior model with log link function and with γ * j in the gamma prior model. In Section 4 we discuss parameter estimation via simulation methods and in Section 5 a numerical example 2 is provided. All the statements are proved in the appendix.
Model assumptionsThe model assumptions are similar to those in the Bayesian claims reserving models presented in England-Verrall [4,5], Verrall [16] and Wüthrich-Merz [17], Section 4.4. We assume that the parameters are modeled through prior distributions and, conditional on these parameters, the incremental claims X i,j have independent ODP distributions for accident years i ∈ {0, . . . , I} and development years j ∈ {0, . . . , I}. The final development year is given by I and the observations at time I are given in the (upper) runoff triangleOur goal is to predict the future claims in the lower triangleModel 1.1 (Bayesian ODP model)• µ 0 , . . . , µ I , γ 0 , . . . , γ I , ϕ are independent positive random variables with joint density u(·).• Conditionally, given parameters Θ = (µ 0 , . . . , µ I , γ 0 , . . . , γ I , ϕ), are X i,j independent random variables withThe parameter µ i plays the role of the row parameter (related to the exposure of accident year i, see (1.2)), the γ j 's descri...