No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background— Left ventricle remodeling after anterior wall myocardial infarction leads to increased left ventricle volumes, myocardial stress, and ultimately heart failure (HF). Treatment options are limited for these high-risk HF patients. A study was conducted to assess safety and feasibility of a percutaneous ventricular restoration therapy using the Parachute device in subjects with HF because of a cardiac ischemic event. Methods and Results— Thirty-nine subjects with New York Heart Association class II to IV ischemic HF, ejection fraction between 15% and 40%, and dilated akinetic or dyskinetic anterior-apical wall without the need to be revascularized were enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter investigation testing percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device. The safety primary end point was defined as successful procedure without device-related major adverse cardiac events during 6 months. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were obtained at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-treatment. Echocardiographic and end point data were adjudicated independently. Of the 39 subjects enrolled, device implantation was attempted in 34 and successful in 31 patients. Twenty-three subjects reached 3 years post-treatment with the device implanted. New York Heart Association symptom class was improved or maintained in 85% of subjects. Left ventricle end-diastolic volume index and end-systolic volume index were reduced from 128.4±22.1 and 94.9±22.3 mL/m 2 preimplant to 115.2±23.1 and 87.3±18.7 mL/m 2 at 3-year follow-up (end-diastolic volume index, P =0.0056; end-systolic volume index, P =0.4719). The cumulative incidence of HF hospitalization or death was 16.1%, 32.3%, and 38.7% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. By 3-year follow-up, 2 (6.5%) of 31 patients with successful implant had died from cardiac reasons, with no cardiac deaths occurring past 6 months post-treatment. Conclusions— The first series of ischemic HF patients treated with percutaneous ventricular restoration using the Parachute device demonstrates feasibility and safety of the device ≤3 years post-treatment. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00573560 (US patients) and NCT01286116 (EU patients).

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting of the complete total occlusion of the SA is a safe and effective procedure associated with low risks and good long-term results.

BackgroundThere is ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of the radial artery (RA) as an aortocoronary conduit, with few solid data regarding long-term clinical results. We sought to determine if the use of the RA as the second arterial conduit, beside left internal thoracic artery (LITA), would improve long-term clinical outcome after CABG as compared to saphenous vein graft (SVG).MethodsBetween March 2001 and November 2003, 200 patients underwent isolated CABG and were randomized in 1:1 fashion to receive either LITA and RA grafts or LITA and SVGs. The primary end point was composite of cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and need for repeat myocardial revascularization (either surgical or percutaneous).ResultsThere was no significant difference in absolute survival, with 12 deaths in each group during the study period (log rank = 0.01, p = 0.979). There were 3 and 2 cardiac deaths in RA and SVG groups, respectively. There was no difference in long-term clinical outcome between the groups (log rank = 0.450, p = 0.509). Eleven patients in RA group had one or more non-fatal events; 7 patients suffered a myocardial infarction, 9 patients underwent percutaneous coronary angioplasty, and 1 patient required redo coronary surgery. Likewise, 13 patients in SVG group had non-fatal event; 7 patients had myocardial infarction, 13 patients had percutaneous coronary intervention and 3 patients required redo coronary surgery. Angiograms were performed in 23 patients in RA group (patency rate 92 %) and 24 in SVG group (patency rate 86 %) (p = 0.67).ConclusionIn this small randomised study our data indicate that there is no difference in the 8 year clinical outcomes in relatively young patients between those having a RA or a saphenous vein graft used as a second conduit, beside LITA, for surgical myocardial revascularisation.