This paper reports the healing rates of venous leg ulcers in a community setting (Exeter and District Community Health Services NHS Trust) using the Charing Cross four-layer compression system. We report on 514 venous leg ulcers and show healing rates of 40% at 12 weeks, 50% at 17 weeks, 57% at 24 weeks and 80% predicted at 2 years. Patients were treated in one of 16 community leg ulcer clinics or in their homes. Nurses were allowed to use this system only after full training by the leg ulcer management service. Nurses had to prove their competence in leg ulcer assessment, Doppler measurement and the technique of four-layer compression. Even in patients whose leg ulcers did not heal, it was felt that the four-layer compression system was comfortable, convenient and cost effective with only weekly changes of bandages being necessary.
Background
Hydrocolloid dressings (HCD) are helpful in chronic wound care, but research is limited in acute postoperative wounds. HCD can potentially be incorporated into a simplified wound care regimen after excisional surgeries.
Objective
To examine whether a one-time HCD application after dermatologic surgery results in greater patient satisfaction and improved postoperative outcomes compared with conventional daily dressings (CDD).
Methods
We examined patients who underwent Mohs or standard surgical excision with linear closure followed by HCD. The patients additionally had a history of excisional surgery with CDD in the past 5 years. A modified version of the validated Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire was administered.
Results
The survey response rate was 74.4% (64/86). Compared with CDD, HCD rated higher in comfort, convenience, scar appearance, and simplicity of wound care instructions (
P
< .0001). Nearly all patients (96.8%) preferred HCD over CDD.
Limitations
Variability in time from prior dermatologic surgery may introduce recall bias. Prior surgeries involving CDD were sometimes performed by a different surgeon, which could introduce other confounding factors.
Conclusions
A simplified wound care regimen involving HCD can potentially lead to increased comfort, convenience, simplicity, and a subjective improvement in scar appearance, though additional studies are needed.
Introduction: While improvements have been made to risk assessment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) patients, there is a critical need for a uniform and more precise stratification system of their care. To address this unmet clinical need, a prognostic 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test has recently been developed and independently validated to show improved stratification of metastatic risk in high-risk cSCC patients compared with current staging systems. Methods: Two cSCC cases, both male with similar patient profiles and the same staging status across two different staging systems, yet with opposing outcomes, were chosen for retrospective review of their primary biopsy using the 40-GEP test.Results: Case 1 declined further treatment, even when presented with evidence of a small focus of cSCC found in the last layer of nonmarginal tissue obtained from Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Case 1 remained recurrence free, and retrospective analysis of the initial biopsy with the 40-GEP test provided a Class 1 result (low likelihood of metastasis). Case 2, even with subsequent clearing of the primary cSCC with MMS, noted another metastatic cSCC 3 months later. Case 2, after multimodal adjuvant treatments, died due to disease progression. Retrospective analysis of the initial biopsy with the 40-GEP test provided a Class 2B result (high likelihood of metastasis). Conclusions: The cases discussed highlight the utility in 40-GEP to provide additional information to guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes. Integrating novel molecular prognostication with traditional clinicopathological risk factors can improve stratification of high-risk cSCC patients and may inform selection of risk-appropriate treatment and surveillance strategies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.