Temporal changes in respiration could influence navigator-echo (NE)-gated MR coronary angiography (MRCA), but systematic investigation of the effects of such variations and how to limit them has not been performed. We addressed these issues by studying the influence of time in the magnet on diaphragm position and respiratory patterns using NE diaphragm monitoring in volunteers and a phantom model. NE diaphragm monitoring was performed at .5 T in 10 subjects over a total period of 35 minutes. The end-expiratory position was sustained for longer (1.1 vs .4 seconds, P < .001) and with greater position stability (SD 1.9 vs 5.9 mm, P = .01) than the end-inspiratory position. Drift of the end-expiratory position occurred over time, causing a fall in scan efficiency (44-28%, P = .01). Up-drift of the end-expiratory position was most common. Loss of scan efficiency was worse with up-drift because of loss of the end-expiratory pause from the NE window (up-drift 10% mm-1, down-drift 7% mm-1, both P = .03). Scan efficiency also was reduced during sleep (to a nadir of 0%), secondary to loss of the end-expiratory pause, periodic breathing with oscillating end-expiratory position, and periods of apnea. The phantom model used actual diaphragm traces to evaluate the artifact resulting from diaphragm motion during acquisition. Artifact was considerably reduced by NE adaptive motion correction compared with NE gating alone (ghosting ratio 2.0 vs 2.8, P < .01). Artifact also was significantly reduced with up-drift if scan efficiency was maintained above 35% (P = .05). For optimal NE-gated MRCA, the following features are important: the NE window should be placed around the end-expiratory position; subjects should not sleep; scan efficiency should be monitored and the NE window should be repositioned if scan efficiency falls below 35%; and adaptive motion correction should be used.
In this Phase I clinical study, a novel ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent, NC100150 Injection (Nycomed Imaging, Oslo, Norway, a part of Nycomed Amersham), was used in two-dimensional magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA). Safety and imaging data were acquired from 18 healthy male volunteers at both 0.5 and 1.5 T, before and after the administration of NC100150 Injection. Through-plane and in-plane images of the right coronary artery were analyzed. The postcontrast imaging sequences used prepulses and a high flip angle, to introduce T1 weighting. At 1.5 T (TE 2.6 msec), the throughplane coronary artery signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (P ؍ 0.04), coronary artery-to-fat signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) (P ؍ 0.001), coronary artery-to-myocardium SDNR (P F 0.001), and coronary artery delineation (P F 0.001) were improved by the administration of NC100150 Injection. For in-plane imaging, coronary artery delineation improved, but there were no significant changes in the SNR and SDNR. At 0.5 T, with the longer TE (6.7 msec) imaging sequence used, there was a reduction in the SNR (P ؍ 0.01), the fat SDNR (through-plane P ؍ 0.02; in-plane P ؍ 0.25), and the coronary artery diameter (P F 0.01 in both imaging planes). There was a trend toward improvement in the myocardial SDNR and coronary artery delineation. In conclusion, NC100150 Injection was given safely to 18 healthy subjects, with no major adverse reactions. Coronary artery delineation was improved in both imaging planes at 1.5 T, with a trend toward improvement at 0.5 T. At 1.5 T, with a short TE imaging sequence, the marked T1 shortening effects of NC100150 Injection were dominant, leading to an improvement in the quantitative parameters for the through-plane images. At 0.5 T, with a longer TE imaging sequence, the T2* effects of the contrast agent played a role in reducing the quantitative image parameters. With further optimization of imaging sequences, to take advantage of the long-lived intravascular T1 shortening effect of NC100150 Injection, further improvements in MRCA will be possible.
Background-There is a high incidence of anomalous coronary arteries in subjects with congenital heart disease. These abnormalities can be responsible for myocardial ischemia and sudden death or be damaged during surgical intervention. It can be difficult to define the proximal course of anomalous coronary arteries with the use of conventional x-ray coronary angiography. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA) has been shown to be useful in the assessment of the 3-dimensional relationship between the coronary arteries and the great vessels in subjects with normal cardiac morphology but has not been used in patients with congenital heart disease. Methods and Results-Twenty-five adults with various congenital heart abnormalities were studied. X-ray coronary angiography and respiratory-gated MRCA were performed in all subjects. Coronary artery origin and proximal course were assessed for each imaging modality by separate, blinded investigators. Images were then compared, and a consensus diagnosis was reached. With the consensus readings for both magnetic resonance and x-ray coronary angiography, it was possible to identify the origin and course of the proximal coronary arteries in all 25 subjects: 16 with coronary anomalies and 9 with normal coronary arteries. Respiratory-gated MRCA had an accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 88%, and a specificity of 100% for the detection of abnormal coronary arteries. The MRCA results were more likely to agree with the consensus for definition of the proximal course of the coronary arteries (PϽ0.02). Conclusions-For the assessment of anomalous coronary artery anatomy in patients with congenital heart disease, the use of the combination of MRCA with x-ray coronary angiography improves the definition of the proximal coronary artery course. MRCA provides correct spatial relationships, whereas x-ray angiography provides a view of the entire coronary length and its peripheral run-off. Furthermore, respiratory-gated MRCA can be performed without breath holding and with only limited subject cooperation.
a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f oRecent fMRI studies demonstrated that functional connectivity is altered following cognitive tasks (e.g., learning) or due to various neurological disorders. We tested whether real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback can be a tool to voluntarily reconfigure brain network interactions. To disentangle learning-related from regulation-related effects, we first trained participants to voluntarily regulate activity in the auditory cortex (training phase) and subsequently asked participants to exert learned voluntary self-regulation in the absence of feedback (transfer phase without learning). Using independent component analysis (ICA), we found network reconfigurations (increases in functional network connectivity) during the neurofeedback training phase between the auditory target region and (1) the auditory pathway; (2) visual regions related to visual feedback processing; (3) insula related to introspection and self-regulation and (4) working memory and high-level visual attention areas related to cognitive effort. Interestingly, the auditory target region was identified as the hub of the reconfigured functional networks without a-priori assumptions. During the transfer phase, we again found specific functional connectivity reconfiguration between auditory and attention network confirming the specific effect of self-regulation on functional connectivity. Functional connectivity to working memory related networks was no longer altered consistent with the absent demand on working memory. We demonstrate that neurofeedback learning is mediated by widespread changes in functional connectivity. In contrast, applying learned self-regulation involves more limited and specific network changes in an auditory setup intended as a model for tinnitus. Hence, neurofeedback training might be used to promote recovery from neurological disorders that are linked to abnormal patterns of brain connectivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.