Some immigrant groups in Europe show an increased prevalence of diabetes, e.g. South Asians in the UK and Moroccans and Turks in the Netherlands. This study aimed at reviewing the literature among immigrants in the Nordic countries. Search was performed primarily of Medline through PubMed, and secondarily of other databases and by using information from reference lists. Terms used were: "Diabetes Mellitus", "Immigrant", and "Nordic countries" or "Scandinavia" or "Denmark", "Finland", "Iceland", "Norway" or "Sweden". Altogether 17 articles on diabetes were found. Excess risk of diabetes was found in non-European immigrant groups, especially from the Middle East and South Asian regions, in some cases 10 times the risk of the indigenous population, with the highest relative risks among women. No excess risk was found among European immigrants, with the possible exception of Finnish women. Conflicting results were found in studies with a low number of diabetic cases, with a failure to show statistically significant excess risks among non-European groups. There were also some other methodological problems, e.g. low participation rate in population based clinical studies, and probable underestimation of known diabetes by self-report. A genetic sensitivity seems likely in the Middle East and South Asian groups, combined with lifestyle factors.

The high prevalence of unhealthy behaviours and risk factors for coronary disease in many immigrant groups might be a lifestyle remnant from their country of birth or might be brought about by a stressful migration and acculturation into a new social and cultural environment. Nevertheless, it is important in primary healthcare to be aware of a possible preventable increased risk of unhealthy behaviours and risk factors for coronary disease in some immigrants.

No abstract

To assess change over time in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in diabetic patients in primary health care and differences to general Swedish population samples, 341 diabetic subjects in 1992 and 413 in 1995, aged 20-84 years, were chosen from three community health centres (CHCs) in the Metropolitan Stockholm area and compared to controls matched by age and sex in randomly selected samples of 2,366 subjects in 1991 and 2,500 in 1995 from the general population. HRQoL was assessed by the Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL), adapted from the Medical Outcomes Study, which measures aspects of physical, mental, social and general health in 13 scales. Information on diabetic and general medical data were extracted from the medical records at the CHCs. HRQoL was lower in diabetic subjects compared with the general population in both 1992 and 1995 in all scales except family functioning and marital functioning. The level of HRQoL did not change significantly between the diabetic samples, but decreased in the population samples, making the difference compared to diabetic patients smaller in five of the scales. The most significant predicting factors for the SWED-QUAL results in diabetic patients in 1995 were the vascular and non-vascular co-morbidity.

Background In recent years, telemedicine consultations have evolved as a new form of providing primary healthcare. Telemedicine options can provide benefits to patients in terms of access, reduced travel time and no risk of disease spreading. However, concerns have been raised that access is not equally distributed in the population, which could lead to increased inequality in health. The aim of this paper is to explore the determinants for use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine consultations in a setting where telemedicine is included in the publicly funded healthcare system. Methods To investigate factors associated with the use of DTC telemedicine, a database was constructed by linking national and regional registries covering the entire population of Stockholm, Sweden (N = 2.3 million). Logistic regressions were applied to explore the determinants for utilization in 2018. As comparators, face-to-face physician consultations in primary healthcare were included in the study, as well as digi-physical physician consultations, i.e., telemedicine consultations offered by traditional primary healthcare providers also offering face-to-face visits, and telephone consultations by nurses. Results The determinants for use of DTC telemedicine differed substantially from face-to-face visits but also to some extent from the other telemedicine options. For the DTC telemedicine consultations, the factors associated with higher probability of utilization were younger age, higher educational attainment, higher income and being born in Sweden. In contrast, the main determinants for use of face-to-face visits were higher age, lower educational background and being born outside of Sweden. Conclusion The use of DTC telemedicine is determined by factors that are generally not associated with greater healthcare need and the distribution raises some concerns about the equity implications. Policy makers aiming to increase the level of telemedicine consultations in healthcare should consider measures to promote access for elderly and individuals born outside of Sweden to ensure that all groups have access to healthcare services according to their needs.