The isokinetic muscle strength in 56 IDDM patients with > 20 years of diabetes duration and in their individually sex-, age-, weight-, and height-matched control subjects was assessed. Peak torque of foot dorsal and plantar flexion and knee and wrist extension and flexion was measured. The neuropathic condition was assessed by a neurological disability score, a neuropathy symptom score, nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory examination. All results were summed to obtain a neuropathy rank-sum score for each patient. According to their renal albumin excretion, the patients were classified to have normo-, micro-, or macroalbuminuria. In addition, according to their retinal status, patients were classified as having no, simple, or proliferative retinopathy. The IDDM patients had a 21% reduction of muscle strength of both ankle dorsal (P < 1 x 10(-4)) and plantar flexors (P < 0.01), compared with control subjects. A 16% reduction of knee extensors (P < 0.005) and a 17% reduction of knee flexors (P < 0.01) was found. In contrast, muscle strength in wrist flexors and extensors was not significantly reduced (10 and 11%, respectively [NS]). In patients with the most severe weakness, muscle strength of the calf muscles was only 50% of the expected performance. Correlations were found between the neuropathy rank-sum score and the muscle strength of ankle dorsal (r = -0.66, P < 1 x 10(-7)) and plantar flexors (r = -0.51, P < 0.0005), knee extensors (r = -0.51, P < 0.0005) and flexors (r = -0.44, P < 0.005), and wrist flexors (r = -0.41, P < 0.005). No correlation was found for wrist extensors (r = 0). Neither were there any relationships between muscle strength at the ankle and knee and the degree of albuminuria or retinopathy. In conclusion, motor performance is substantially impaired in long-term IDDM patients, and the weakness is related to the presence of neuropathy but not to albuminuria or retinopathy per se.

Background:Renal denervation (RDN), treating resistant hypertension, has, in open trial design, been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) dramatically, but this was primarily with respect to office BP.Method:We conducted a SHAM-controlled, double-blind, randomized, single-center trial to establish efficacy data based on 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Inclusion criteria were daytime systolic ABPM at least 145 mmHg following 1 month of stable medication and 2 weeks of compliance registration. All RDN procedures were carried out by an experienced operator using the unipolar Medtronic Flex catheter (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California, USA).Results:We randomized 69 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension to RDN (n = 36) or SHAM (n = 33). Groups were well balanced at baseline. Mean baseline daytime systolic ABPM was 159 ± 12 mmHg (RDN) and 159 ± 14 mmHg (SHAM). Groups had similar reductions in daytime systolic ABPM compared with baseline at 3 months [−6.2 ± 18.8 mmHg (RDN) vs. −6.0 ± 13.5 mmHg (SHAM)] and at 6 months [−6.1 ± 18.9 mmHg (RDN) vs. −4.3 ± 15.1 mmHg (SHAM)]. Mean usage of antihypertensive medication (daily defined doses) at 3 months was equal [6.8 ± 2.7 (RDN) vs. 7.0 ± 2.5 (SHAM)].RDN performed at a single center and by a high-volume operator reduced ABPM to the same level as SHAM treatment and thus confirms the result of the HTN3 trial.Conclusion:Further, clinical use of RDN for treatment of resistant hypertension should await positive results from double-blinded, SHAM-controlled trials with multipolar ablation catheters or novel denervation techniques.