Background The COVID-19 pandemic is disrupting normal life globally, every area of life is touched. The pandemic demands quick action and as new information emerges, reliable synthesises and guidelines for care are urgently needed. Breastfeeding protects mother and child; its health benefits are undisputed and based on evidence. To plan and support breastfeeding within the current pandemic, two areas need to be understood: 1) the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 as it applies to breastfeeding and 2) the protective properties of breastfeeding, including the practice of skin-to-skin care. This review aims to summarise how to manage breastfeeding during COVID-19. The summary was used to create guidelines for healthcare professionals and mothers. Methods Current publications on breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic were reviewed to inform guidelines for clinical practice. Results Current evidence states that the Coronavirus is not transmitted via breastmilk. Breastfeeding benefits outweigh possible risks during the COVID-19 pandemic and may even protect the infant and mother. General infection control measures should be in place and adhered to very strictly. Conclusions Breastfeeding should be encouraged, mothers and infant dyads should be cared for together, and skin-to-skin contact ensured throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. If mothers are too ill to breastfeed, they should still be supported to express their milk, and the infant should be fed by a healthy individual. Guidelines, based on this current evidence, were produced and can be distributed to health care facilities where accessible information is needed.
3 Sarna A, Porwal A, Ramesh S, et al. Characterisation of the types of anaemia prevalent among children and adolescents aged 1-19 years in India: a population-based study.
If maternal milk is unavailable, the World Health Organization recommends that the first alternative should be pasteurised donor human milk (DHM). Human milk banks (HMBs) screen and recruit milk donors, and DHM principally feeds very low birth weight babies, reducing the risk of complications and supporting maternal breastfeeding where used alongside optimal lactation support. The COVID‐19 pandemic has presented a range of challenges to HMBs worldwide. This study aimed to understand the impacts of the pandemic on HMB services and develop initial guidance regarding risk limitation. A Virtual Collaborative Network (VCN) comprising over 80 HMB leaders from 36 countries was formed in March 2020 and included academics and nongovernmental organisations. Individual milk banks, national networks and regional associations submitted data regarding the number of HMBs, volume of DHM produced and number of recipients in each global region. Estimates were calculated in the context of missing or incomplete data. Through open‐ended questioning, the experiences of milk banks from each country in the first 2 months of the pandemic were collected and major themes identified. According to data collected from 446 individual HMBs, more than 800,000 infants receive DHM worldwide each year. Seven pandemic‐related specific vulnerabilities to service provision were identified, including sufficient donors, prescreening disruption, DHM availability, logistics, communication, safe handling and contingency planning, which were highly context‐dependent. The VCN now plans a formal consensus approach to the optimal response of HMBs to new pathogens using crowdsourced data, enabling the benchmarking of future strategies to support DHM access and neonatal health in future emergencies.
Panel: Ethical considerations to shape key actions Ethical considerations VulnerabilityConsider potential medical, social, and economic vulnerabilities of both donor and recipient mother-infant dyad and mechanisms for reducing vulnerabilities. Equity and fairnessConsider which populations carry the risks and burdens of supplying donor human milk; and which receive the benefits of donor human milk. Consider how equity and fairness are addressed through allocation and access to donor milk and develop safeguards to prevent exploitation of women donating and selling milk. Respect for autonomyConsider and respect personal and community decisions regarding donor human milk. Consider the role that sociocultural factors, such as religion and kinship, play in decision-making processes. Human rightsEnsure equitable access to donor human milk, without discrimination, for infants in need. Call on governments to meet their commitments to women and children through existing conventions and human rights mechanisms,* which call for maternity protection, gender equality, and rights of women and children to adequate food, nutrition, health, and informed choice.
This cluster randomised trial in KwaZulu-Natal South Africa, evaluated the implementation of a Feeding Buddies (FB) programme to improve exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) amongst human immunodeficiency virus infected mothers. Eight clinics were randomly allocated to intervention and control arms respectively. Pregnant women attending the prevention of mother-to-child transmission program and intending to EBF were enrolled: control (n = 326), intervention (n = 299). Intervention mothers selected FBs to support them and they were trained together (four sessions). Interviews of mothers occurred prenatally and at post-natal visits (day 3, weeks 6, 14 and 22). Breastfeeding results were analysed (Stata) as interval-censored time-to-event data, with up to four time intervals per mother. EBF rates at the final interview were similar for control and intervention groups: 44.68% (105/235) and 42.75% (109/255) respectively (p = 0.67). In Cox regression analysis better EBF rates were observed in mothers who received the appropriate training (p = 0.036), had a community care giver visit (p = 0.044), while controlling for other factors. Implementation realities reduced the potential effectiveness of the FBs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.