Abstract:Demodex has been considered to be related with multiple skin disorders, but controversy persists. In this case-control study, a survey was conducted with 860 dermatosis patients aged 12 to 84 years in Xi'an, China to identify the association between facial dermatosis and Demodex. Amongst the patients, 539 suffered from facial dermatosis and 321 suffered from non-facial dermatosis. Demodex mites were sampled and examined using the skin pressurization method. Multivariate regression analysis was applied to analyze the association between facial dermatosis and Demodex infestation, and to identify the risk factors of Demodex infestation. The results showed that total detection rate of Demodex was 43.0%. Patients aged above 30 years had higher odds of Demodex infestation than those under 30 years. Compared to patients with neutral skin, patients with mixed, oily, or dry skin were more likely to be infested with Demodex (odds ratios (ORs) were 2.5, 2.4, and 1.6, respectively). Moreover, Demodex infestation was found to be statistically associated with rosacea (OR=8.1), steroid-induced dermatitis (OR=2.7), seborrheic dermatitis (OR=2.2), and primary irritation dermatitis (OR=2.1). In particular, ORs calculated from the severe infestation (≥5 mites/cm 2 ) rate were significantly higher than those of the total rate. Therefore, we concluded that Demodex is associated with rosacea, steroid-induced dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, and primary irritation dermatitis. The rate of severe infestation is found to be more correlated with various dermatosis than the total infestation rate. The risk factors of Demodex infestation, age, and skin types were identified. Our study also suggested that good hygiene practice might reduce the chances of demodicosis and Demodex infestation.

The efficient identification of bacteria is of considerable significance in clinical diagnosis. Herein, a novel colorimetric sensor array was developed for the detection and identification of bacteria based on the specific affinity and electrostatic interaction between Wulff-type 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (MPBA)-mercaptoethylamine (MA) cofunctionalized AgNPs (MPBA-MA@AgNPs) and bacteria at various pH. In the neutral and alkaline conditions, AgNPs tended to be dispersed due to the specific affinity between cis-diol residues contained in carbohydrate-rich compositions on the bacterial cell surface and MPBA. Bacterial cells have different carbohydrate compositions on their surface. The differential binding affinity of MPBA on the surface of AgNPs to cis-diol residues of various carbohydrates resulted in a different color change of AgNPs, which could be tuned by pH. On the contrary, AgNPs tended to be aggregated due to the electrostatic interaction between positively charged MA and negatively charged bacteria under acidic conditions. Therefore, using various pH buffer solutions as the sensing elements and MPBA-MA@AgNPs as the indicator, bacteria could be differentiated from each other by their own color response patterns. Moreover, the complex bacteria mixtures could be well discriminated. The method is simple, efficient, and visual and has a potential application in pathogen diagnosis.

Background: Our previous study revealed that PLAGL2 or POFUT1 can promote tumorigenesis and maintain significant positive correlations in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the mechanism leading to the co-expression and the underlying functional and biological implications remain unclear. Methods: Clinical tumor tissues and TCGA dataset were utilized to analyze the co-expression of PLAGL2 and POFUT1. Luciferase reporter assays, specially made bidirectional promoter vectors and ectopic expression of 3'UTR were employed to study the mechanisms of co-expression. In vitro and in vivo assays were performed to further confirm the oncogenic function of both. The sphere formation assay, immunofluorescence, Western blot and qRT-PCR were performed to investigate the effect of both genes in colorectal cancer stem cells (CSCs). Findings: PLAGL2 and POFUT1 maintained co-expression in CRC (r = 0.91, p b .0001). An evolutionarily conserved bidirectional promoter, rather than post-transcriptional regulation by competing endogenous RNAs, caused the co-expression of PLAGL2 and POFUT1 in CRC. The bidirectional gene pair PLAGL2/POFUT1 was subverted in CRC and acted synergistically to promote colorectal tumorigenesis by maintaining stemness of colorectal cancer stem cells through the Wnt and Notch pathways. Finally, PLAGL2 and POFUT1 share transcription factor binding sites, and introducing mutations into promoter regions with shared transcription regulatory elements led to a decrease in the PLAGL2/POFUT1 promoter activity in both directions. Interpretation: Our team identified for the first time a bidirectional promoter pair oncogene, PLAGL2-POFUT1, in CRC. The two genes synergistically promote the progression of CRC and affect the characteristics of CSCs, which can offer promising intervention targets for clinicians and researchers.

No abstract