Whether torture is justifiable or feasible is a long-lasting debate between consequentialists and deontologists which involves human morality and ethics. This essay evaluates the legitimacy and feasibility of torture, examining the reasoning behind both utilitarian and deontological approaches. The essay is based on a thought experiment: the ticking bomb scenario, in which a terrorist places a bomb that can kill the city's entire population, and the terrorist is captured by the police. The dilemma here is to determine whether we should torture the criminal to save the people in the city. Our discussion expands on Michael Moore's idea of threshold deontology, verifying the rationality of his reasoning. We conclude that torture is never morally justified, so it should be prohibited. However, defendants should have the justification of necessity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.