The evolution of large organismal size is fundamentally important for multicellularity, creating new ecological niches and opportunities for the evolution of increased biological complexity. Yet little is known about how large size evolves, particularly in nascent multicellular organisms that lack genetically-regulated multicellular development. Here we examine the interplay between biological and biophysical drivers of macroscopic multicellularity using long-term experimental evolution. Over 600 daily transfers (~3,000 generations), multicellular snowflake yeast evolved macroscopic size, becoming ~2·104 times larger (~mm scale) and 104-fold more biophysically tough, while remaining clonal. They accomplished this through sustained biophysical adaptation, evolving increasingly elongate cells that initially reduced the strain of cellular packing, then facilitated branch entanglement so that groups of cells stay together even after many cellular bonds fracture. Four out of five replicate populations show evidence of predominantly adaptive evolution, with mutations becoming significantly enriched in genes affecting cell shape and cell-cell bonds. Taken together, this work shows how selection acting on the emergent properties of simple multicellular groups can drive sustained biophysical adaptation, an early step in the evolution of increasingly complex multicellular organisms.
The study of mating choices often focuses on correlates of traits to the overall outcome of a mating interaction. However, mating interactions can proceed through a series of stages, with opportunities for assessment at each stage. We compared whether male or female size predicted mating interaction outcome across several stages of mating in five species of North American leiobunine harvestmen (commonly known as daddy longlegs). Leiobunine harvestmen have been previously shown to exhibit incredible morphological diversity consistent with a spectrum of male–female antagonism. Across all of the species, we found a general progression of female size predicting the outcome (success and timing) of early stages of interactions, and male size or male size relative to female size predicting the outcome and timing of later stages of interactions. We also found that size was not a strong predictor of outcome in the two species on the lower end of the antagonism spectrum. The variation in how female and male size predicted outcomes across species and stages of mating suggests that multiple mechanisms may operate to shape mating dynamics within and across species. Given the close relatedness of the species studied, the patterns we uncovered suggest a rapid evolution of the traits and processes predicting the outcome of mating interactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.