In our single-centre experience, the lateral thoracotomy with outflow graft anastomosis to the descending aorta had similar early outcomes compared to the standard sternotomy.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is considered as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Recently, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been increasingly used in reducing pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) in patients with PH unresponsive to medical therapy. Herein, we aimed to compare the efficacy of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow blood pumps on the improvement of PH in mechanical circulatory support patients. Twenty-seven patients with end-stage heart failure who underwent LVAD implantation surgery were enrolled. Fifteen of them (55.6%) had continuous-flow pump (HeartWare Ventricular Assist System, HeartWare, Inc., Miramar, FL, USA), and 12 of them (44.4%) had pulsatile pump (Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device, Berlin Heart AG, Berlin, Germany). The efficacy of LVADs on the improvement of PH was compared between continuous-flow and pulsatile pumps by the evaluation of systolic PAP, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right ventricular systolic motion (RVSM), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and grade of tricuspid insufficiency (TI) for each of the study participants. All of the 15 patients who underwent continuous-flow blood pump implantation surgery (Group 1) were male with a mean age of 46.9 ± 11.7 years, and in pulsatile-flow blood pump implanted participants (Group 2), the mean age was 40.6 ± 16.8 years, all of whom were also male (P=0.259). Mean follow-up was 313.7 ± 241.3 days in Group 1 and 448.7 ± 120.7 days in Group 2 (P=0.139). In Group 1, mean preoperative and postoperative systolic PAP were measured as 51.7 ± 12.2 mm Hg and 22.2 ± 3.4 mm Hg, respectively, while those in Group 2 were 54.5 ± 7.5 mm Hg and 33.9 ± 6.4 mm Hg, respectively. A significantly greater decrease in systolic PAP was noticed in patients with continuous-flow blood pumps (P=0.023); however, no statistically significant difference was found when we considered the change in TAPSE between study groups (P=0.112). A statistical significance in the alteration of RVEF, RVSM, and the grade of TI during study visits was not found between the study groups (P=0.472, P=0.887, and P=0.237, respectively). Although the two studied types of LVADs were found to be effective in reducing PAP in heart transplantation candidates with PH, lesser postoperative systolic PAP values were achieved in patients who underwent continuous-flow pump implantation surgery.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct right atrial catheter insertion for hemodialysis in patients with multiple venous access failure. We retrospectively evaluated the charts of 27 patients with multiple venous access failure who had intra-atrial dialysis catheter placement between October 2005 and October 2010 in our clinic. Permanent right atrial dialysis catheters were placed through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy under intratracheal general anesthesia in all patients. Demographics of the cases, the patency rates of hemodialysis via atrial catheterization, existence of any catheter thrombosis, and catheter-related infections were documented and used in statistical analysis. Seventeen women (63%) and 10 men (37%) with the mean age of 59.0 ± 7.1 years (47-71) were enrolled in this study. Chronic renal failure was diagnosed for the mean of 78.9 ± 24.3 months (33-130). Five patients (18.5%) died. Ventricular fibrillation and myocardial infarction were the causes of death in the early postoperative period in two patients. Two of the remaining three patients died because of cerebrovascular events, and one patient died because of an unknown cause. Ten patients (37%) had been using anticoagulate agents (warfarin) because of concomitant disorders such as deep vein thrombosis, operated valve disease, and arrhythmias. Catheter thrombosis and malfunction was determined in three cases (11.1%). Intra-atrial hemodialysis catheterization is a safe and effective life-saving measure for the patients with multiple venous failure and without any possibility of peritoneal dialysis or renal transplantation.

No abstract

Pump thrombosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Although it has been defined clearly, the diagnosis and treatment of this complication still remain controversial. Between 2010 and 2014, 163 consecutive patients (mean age: 50.7 ± 13 years, 84% males, median duration of support: 277 (2-1077) days) were implanted a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Prospectively collected data of all patients who had at least one pump thrombosis event have been analyzed, retrospectively. Twenty-one pump thrombosis events were observed in 15 patients (9.2%, 0.137 events/patient-year). Median duration of support at the time of first pump thrombosis event was 259 (8-585) days. Overall mortality was 40% (6/15), and overall procedural success was 71.4% (15/21) in our entire cohort. The cause of mortality was hemorrhagic stroke in those who had medical treatment (n = 5), and sepsis and right ventricular failure in the other who had pump exchange. Pump exchange was performed in five patients, of which four survived. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists are not beneficial in medical treatment of pump thrombosis. Medical treatment methods including unfractionated heparin and thrombolytics may completely resolve the thrombus and save some patients from pump exchange. In patients where medical treatment does not result in complete thrombus resolution within a reasonable period, and a donor heart is not available, pump exchange is the ultimate solution. Further studies are needed for optimal dosing of thrombolytics to decrease the rate of side effects.

No abstract

Ischemic and hemorrhagic events are the common causes of morbidity and mortality after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts thromboembolic (TE) event risk and HAS-BLED score predicts bleeding risk in patients on anticoagulant with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate whether these scoring systems would be predictive of TE and bleeding complications after CF-LVAD implantation. From December 2010 to December 2014, 145 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation at a single center were included. Mean age was 50.7 ± 11.2 years, and 85.5% were male. Baseline CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were retrospectively determined for patients with CF-LVADs. After device implantation, all patients were on warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2-3) as well as 300 mg of aspirin daily. Median length of support was 316 days (range 31-1,060), with 22 TE events (15.2%) and 32 bleeding (22.1%) events. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.3 ± 1.4 and 2.5 ± 1.2 (p = 0.2) in patients with and without TE event, respectively. The mean HAS-BLED score was 1.8 ± 0.8 and 1.42 ± 0.6 (p = 0.004) in patients with and without bleeding, respectively. Baseline high HAS-BLED score was predictive of bleeding events after CF-LVAD implantation, whereas baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score was not predictive of TE events.

OBJECTIVES Risk scores for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy are known to predict morbidity and adverse events in addition to mortality. This study evaluates the capacity of popular LVAD risk scores to predict cardiopulmonary exercise parameters. METHODS Adult patients undergoing continuous flow LVAD implantation were prospectively followed. Five risk scores were calculated before implantation: Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI), MELD including sodium (MELD-Na), HeartMate2 Risk Score (HMRS) and Destination Therapy Risk Score (DTRS). Cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) were performed before and after implantation; peak oxygen consumption (vO2max), the lowest ventilation to carbon dioxide output ratio (vE/vCO2) and exercise time were measured. RESULTS Ninety-two patients were implanted during the study period; of these, 30 patients completed preimplantation and postimplantation CPETs (CPET cohort). The mean preimplantation and postimplantation CPET dates were 29 ± 10 days before and 109 ± 5 days following implantation. CPET parameters significantly improved after implantation (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, MELD, MELD-XI, MELD-Na and HMRS independently predicted both preimplantation and postimplantation vE/vCO2, while MELD-Na and HMRS were also independent predictors of preimplantation and postimplantation vO2max, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Four preimplantation LVAD risk scores (HMRS, MELD, MELD-Na and MELD-XI) independently predict important cardiopulmonary exercise parameters such as vE/vCO2 and vO2 max in LVAD therapy. Out of these 4 risk scores, MELD-Na and HMRS appear to be the best predictors of preimplantation and postimplantation CPET parameters, respectively.