We used data from the 1996 panel of the Survey of Income and Program Participation to examine the extent to which working-age people with disabilities experience several types of material hardships. Copyright (c) 2007 by the Southwestern Social Science Association.
The authors use longitudinal data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation spanning 1996 to 1999 to estimate the prevalence of short-and long-term poverty among working-age people with and without disabilities. Depending on the disability measure used, annual poverty rates are 2 to 5 times higher among people with disabilities compared to those without disabilities. The relative long-term poverty rates among those with disabilities are much higher than the relative short-term poverty rates. People with disabilities represented 47% of those in poverty in 1997 according to an annual measure of poverty and 65% of those in poverty according to a long-term measure. The reasons that disability receives little attention in the poverty literature may be that most statistics are based on short-term measures, which partially mask the strong relationship between long-term poverty and long-term disability, and outdated perceptions of the relationship between disability and the ability to work.
The current mix of public and private programs to support workers after they experience disability onset provides benefits to millions of workers and former workers. Yet, despite the large and growing costs of these programs, the inflation-adjusted household incomes of workers with disabilities have been falling for more than two decades, both absolutely and, especially, relative to the incomes of those without disabilities. The aging of the baby boom generation is likely to make matters worse, and the government's fiscal circumstance will make it increasingly difficult to sustain existing public programs. Current public policy initiatives might eventually improve the disability support system, but they are not likely to ward off the adverse consequences of the pending crisis. Policy changes that leverage existing private sector practices and capabilities might achieve greater success but have received little attention and are far from proven.
When you cannot measure, your knowledge is meager and unsatisfactory."-Lord Kelvin 1 "If you are not counted, you don't count."-Cyndi Jones, Center for an Accessible Society Efforts to provide statistics on the number and status of workingage people with disabilities have a history of being fragmented and sporadic. As a group, they are often overlooked in mainstream discussions of the latest statistics on employment, income, poverty, and other measures of the status of the population. In contrast, government agencies routinely compile and report such statistics for groups defi ned by sex, age, race, ethnicity, and marital status. Indeed, one of the most frequently cited statistical reports on the socioeconomic status of the U.S. population-the U.S. Census Bureau's Annual Report on Income, 2 Stapleton, Houtenville, Weathers, and Burkhauser Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States-does not mention this group. The overarching objective of this book is to support and facilitate efforts to improve statistics and data on working-age people with disabilities. Many of the limitations with statistics and data on this population are well-known. There have been signifi cant efforts to address the limitations, and some progress has been made. That progress, however, has often been at the whim of external forces, such as the extent of support for improvements to federal data collection, advances in information technologies, concerns about privacy protection, and government expenditure priorities, rather than for the purpose of systematically capturing the size and socioeconomic characteristics of this population. As a result, statistics and data for working-age people with disabilities are not on par with those for other "at-risk" working-age populationsgroups that are more likely than others to experience adverse socioeconomic outcomes, such as some racial and ethnic minorities, children, unmarried parents, and the elderly. This book provides a systematic review of what current statistics and data on working-age people with disabilities can and cannot tell us, and how they can be improved to better inform policymakers, advocates, administrators, analysts, service providers, and others. This book will inform two broad audiences. The fi rst consists of those interested in what current data can tell us about the prevalence of disabilities among working-age people and their socioeconomic status, but who are dissatisfi ed with the limited, and often confusing, statistics cited in the mainstream press. For this audience, the book also offers the best available statistics on levels and trends in their employment, income, poverty, and health and functional status. The second audience is a more specialized group of professionals (academics, advocates, government policymakers, service providers, etc.) who require reliable information to support evidence-based public policy and administrative decisions. For them, we go beyond "facts" to 1) examine how robust these facts are across data sets, 2) consider the strengths...
When you cannot measure, your knowledge is meager and unsatisfactory."-Lord Kelvin 1 "If you are not counted, you don't count."-Cyndi Jones, Center for an Accessible Society Efforts to provide statistics on the number and status of workingage people with disabilities have a history of being fragmented and sporadic. As a group, they are often overlooked in mainstream discussions of the latest statistics on employment, income, poverty, and other measures of the status of the population. In contrast, government agencies routinely compile and report such statistics for groups defi ned by sex, age, race, ethnicity, and marital status. Indeed, one of the most frequently cited statistical reports on the socioeconomic status of the U.S. population-the U.S. Census Bureau's Annual Report on Income, 2 Stapleton, Houtenville, Weathers, and Burkhauser Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States-does not mention this group. The overarching objective of this book is to support and facilitate efforts to improve statistics and data on working-age people with disabilities. Many of the limitations with statistics and data on this population are well-known. There have been signifi cant efforts to address the limitations, and some progress has been made. That progress, however, has often been at the whim of external forces, such as the extent of support for improvements to federal data collection, advances in information technologies, concerns about privacy protection, and government expenditure priorities, rather than for the purpose of systematically capturing the size and socioeconomic characteristics of this population. As a result, statistics and data for working-age people with disabilities are not on par with those for other "at-risk" working-age populationsgroups that are more likely than others to experience adverse socioeconomic outcomes, such as some racial and ethnic minorities, children, unmarried parents, and the elderly. This book provides a systematic review of what current statistics and data on working-age people with disabilities can and cannot tell us, and how they can be improved to better inform policymakers, advocates, administrators, analysts, service providers, and others. This book will inform two broad audiences. The fi rst consists of those interested in what current data can tell us about the prevalence of disabilities among working-age people and their socioeconomic status, but who are dissatisfi ed with the limited, and often confusing, statistics cited in the mainstream press. For this audience, the book also offers the best available statistics on levels and trends in their employment, income, poverty, and health and functional status. The second audience is a more specialized group of professionals (academics, advocates, government policymakers, service providers, etc.) who require reliable information to support evidence-based public policy and administrative decisions. For them, we go beyond "facts" to 1) examine how robust these facts are across data sets, 2) consider the strengths...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.