Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Depending on the extent of disease and competing comorbidities for mortality, multiple liver-directed therapy options exist for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Advancements in radiation oncology have led to the emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy as a promising liver-directed therapy, which delivers high doses of radiation with a steep dose gradient to maximize local tumor control and minimize radiation-induced treatment toxicity. In this study, we review the current clinical data as well as the unresolved issues and controversies regarding stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: (1) Is there a radiation dose–response relationship with hepatocellular carcinoma? (2) What are the optimal dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced liver disease, and do they differ for patients with varying liver function? (3) How do we assess treatment response on imaging? (4) How does stereotactic body radiation therapy compare to other liver-directed therapy modalities, including proton beam therapy? Based on the current literature discussed, this review highlights future possible research and clinical directions.

Peer review during physician chart rounds is a major quality assurance and patient safety step in radiation oncology. However, the effectiveness of chart rounds in detecting problematic treatment plans is unknown. We performed a prospective blinded study of error detection at chart rounds to clarify the effectiveness of this quality assurance step. Methods and Materials: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System publications were queried for problematic plans approved for treatment that would be detectable at chart rounds. A resident physician, physicist, and dosimetrist collaboratively generated 20 treatment plans with simulated errors identical in nature to those reported to the Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System. These were inserted randomly into weekly chart rounds over 9 weeks, with a median of 2 problematic plans presented per chart rounds (range, 1-4). Data were collected on detection, attendance, length, and number of cases presented at chart rounds. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and univariable logistic regression with odds ratios. Results: The median length of chart rounds over the study period was 60 minutes (range, 42-79); median number of cases presented per chart rounds was 45 (range, 38-50). The overall detection rate was 55% (11 of 20). Detection rates were higher for cases presented earlier in chart rounds: 75% versus 25% of problematic plans were detected within 30 minutes of start of chart rounds versus after 30 minutes (odds Sources of support: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Disclosures: Dr Roy Decker reports grants and personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, and personal fees from Regeneron outside the submitted work. Research data are stored in an institutional repository and select data may be shared upon request to the corresponding author as per institutional guidelines.

Purpose Lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes (PSW LN) may be involved in up to 24% of locoregionally advanced rectal cancers. PSW LN are not resected in total mesorectal excision (TME), and no standard of care regarding the management of PSW LN exists in the United States. We assessed our institutional experience of preoperative radiation therapy (RT) boost to clinically involved PSW LN that were not planned for resection. Methods and materials Data from all patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed to identify those who received a cumulative dose of >50.4 Gy to suspicious PSW LN during neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT). Demographic, cancer characteristic, treatment, and toxicity data were derived from the chart. Results Of a total of 261 patients, 12 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 47.5 years, and 83% of patients were men. All patients had T3/4 disease, 17% of patients had N1b disease and the remainder had N2 disease, and 33% had M1 disease (all ≤2 metastases). Seventy-five percent of patients had moderately or poorly differentiated histology. The mean distance from the anal verge was 4.85 cm (range, 2-8.9 cm), and 58% had ≥2 PSW LN with an average short axis diameter of 1.11 cm (range, 0.4-3.2 cm). Boost doses ranged from 53.48 Gy to 60.2 Gy in 27 to 30 fractions (1.8-2.15 Gy/fraction). The median follow-up time was 18 months. One patient who received concurrent capecitabine and irinotecan had grade 3 perineal dermatitis and anemia during nCRT. The median hospitalization time for TME was 6.5 days. Within 90 days of TME, 1 patient required surgical exploration for perineal wound breakdown, and another required a blood transfusion for anemia. At the time of the last follow up, 75% of patients were alive. Local control at 12 months was 90%. Conclusions RT dose escalation to nonresected PSW LN during nCRT was well tolerated with a low risk of acute toxicity and perioperative complications and has a high rate of local control at 12 months. RT boost warrants further study in patients with clinically involved nonresected PSW LN.

No abstract