Current methods for screening and detecting delirium are not practical in clinical settings. We previously showed that a simplified EEG with bispectral electroencephalography (BSEEG) algorithm can detect delirium in elderly inpatients. In this study, we performed a post-hoc BSEEG data analysis using larger sample size and performed topological data analysis to improve the BSEEG method. Data from 274 subjects included in the previous study were analyzed as a 1st cohort. Subjects were enrolled at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) between January 30, 2016, and October 30, 2017. A second cohort with 265 subjects was recruited between January 16, 2019, and August 19, 2019. The BSEEG score was calculated as a power ratio between low frequency to high frequency using our newly developed algorithm. Additionally, Topological data analysis (TDA) score was calculated by applying TDA to our EEG data. The BSEEG score and TDA score were compared between those patients with delirium and without delirium. Among the 274 subjects from the first cohort, 102 were categorized as delirious. Among the 206 subjects from the second cohort, 42 were categorized as delirious. The areas under the curve (AUCs) based on BSEEG score were 0.72 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.76 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.67 (2nd cohort). AUCs from TDA were much higher at 0.82 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.84 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.78 (2nd cohort). When sensitivity was set to be 0.80, the TDA drastically improved specificity to 0.66 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.72 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.62 (2nd cohort), compared to 0.48 (1st cohort, Fp1-A1), 0.54 (1st cohort, Fp2-A2), and 0.46 (2nd cohort) with BSEEG. BSEEG has the potential to detect delirium, and TDA is helpful to improve the performance.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Detecting delirium is important to identify patients with a high risk of poor outcomes. Although many different kinds of screening instruments for delirium exist, there is no solid consensus about which methods are the most effective. In addition, it is important to find the most useful tools in predicting outcomes such as mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

No abstract

Background We have developed the bispectral electroencephalography (BSEEG) method for detection of delirium and prediction of poor outcomes. Aims To improve the BSEEG method by introducing a new EEG device. Method In a prospective cohort study, EEG data were obtained and BSEEG scores were calculated. BSEEG scores were filtered on the basis of standard deviation (s.d.) values to exclude signals with high noise. Both non-filtered and s.d.-filtered BSEEG scores were analysed. BSEEG scores were compared with the results of three delirium screening scales: the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU), the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS) and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS). Additionally, the 365-day mortalities and the length of stay (LOS) in the hospital were analysed. Results We enrolled 279 elderly participants and obtained 620 BSEEG recordings; 142 participants were categorised as BSEEG-positive, reflecting slower EEG activity. BSEEG scores were higher in the CAM-ICU-positive group than in the CAM-ICU-negative group. There were significant correlations between BSEEG scores and scores on the DRS and the DOSS. The mortality rate of the BSEEG-positive group was significantly higher than that of the BSEEG-negative group. The LOS of the BSEEG-positive group was longer compared with that of the BSEEG-negative group. BSEEG scores after s.d. filtering showed stronger correlations with delirium screening scores and more significant prediction of mortality. Conclusions We confirmed the usefulness of the BSEEG method for detection of delirium and of delirium severity, and prediction of patient outcomes with a new EEG device.

We have previously developed a bispectral electroencephalography (BSEEG) device, which was shown to be effective in detecting delirium and predicting patient outcomes. In this study we aimed to apply the BSEEG approach for a sepsis. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center. Sepsis-positive cases were identified based on retrospective chart review. EEG raw data and calculated BSEEG scores were obtained in the previous studies. The relationship between BSEEG scores and sepsis was analyzed, as well as the relationship among sepsis, BSEEG score, and mortality. Data were analyzed from 628 patients. The BSEEG score from the first encounter (1st BSEEG) showed a significant difference between patients with and without sepsis (p = 0.0062), although AUC was very small indicating that it is not suitable for detection purpose. Sepsis patients with high BSEEG scores showed the highest mortality, and non-sepsis patients with low BSEEG scores showed the lowest mortality. Mortality of non-sepsis patients with high BSEEG scores was as bad as that of sepsis patients with low BSEEG scores. Even adjusting for age, gender, comorbidity, and sepsis status, BSEEG remained a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.008). These data are demonstrating its usefulness as a potential tool for identification of patients at high risk and management of sepsis.