Objective:to know the degree of fulfillment of the requests that women reflect in their
birth plans and to determine their influence on the main obstetric and neonatal
outcomes. Method:retrospective, descriptive and analytical study with 178 women with birth plans in
third-level hospital. Inclusion criteria: low risk gestation, cephalic
presentation, single childbirth, delivered at term. Scheduled and urgent cesareans
without labor were excluded. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the
variables was performed. Results:the birth plan was mostly fulfilled in only 37% of the women. The group of women
whose compliance was low (less than or equal to 50%) had a cesarean section rate
of 18.8% and their children had worse outcomes in the Apgar test and umbilical
cord pH; while in women with high compliance (75% or more), the percentage of
cesareans fell to 6.1% and their children had better outcomes. Conclusion:birth plans have a low degree of compliance. The higher the compliance, the better
is the maternal and neonatal outcomes. The birth plan can be an effective tool to
achieve better outcomes for the mother and her child. Measures are needed to
improve its compliance.
Objective: to evaluate the effects of labor stimulation with oxytocin on maternal and
neonatal outcomes. Method: descriptive and analytical study with 338 women who gave birth at a tertiary
hospital. Obstetric and neonatal variables were measured and compared in women
submitted and non-submitted to stimulation with oxytocin. Statistics were
performed using Chi-square test, Fisher exact test, Student t-test; and crude Odds
Ratio with 95% confidence interval were calculated. A p < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant. Results: stimulation with oxytocin increases the rates of cesarean sections, epidural
anesthesia and intrapartum maternal fever in primiparous and multiparous women. It
has also been associated with low pH values of umbilical cord blood and with a
shorter duration of the first stage of labor in primiparous women. However, it did
not affect the rates of 3rd and 4th degree perineal lacerations, episiotomies,
advanced neonatal resuscitation, 5-minute Apgar scores and meconium. Conclusion: stimulation with oxytocin should not be used systematically, but only in specific
cases. These findings provide further evidence to health professionals and
midwives on the use of oxytocin during labor. Under normal conditions, women
should be informed of the possible effects of labor stimulation with oxytocin.
Findings of this study provide evidence that birth plans may be helpful and are not associated with any negative obstetric or neonatal outcomes. Mothers with birth plans and their babies have at least as good outcomes as those without a birth plan. Babies of nulliparous women with birth plans had better umbilical cord blood pH values than babies of nulliparous women without birth plans. Healthcare professionals can promote the use of birth plans as a resource to enhance communication of women's desires for labor and birth.
The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a high risk to the mental health of the entire population. Pregnant women are strongly affected by the consequences of COVID-19, resulting in increased anxiety and stress. Social support can be a protective factor when it comes to mental health disturbances such as anxiety, fear, or stress in pregnant women. This research aims to describe the anxiety and stress of women in the first trimester of pregnancy in times of pandemic and its relationship with social support. A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 115 women in the first trimester of pregnancy participated. Anxiety was found in 78.3% of the women. Self-perceived stress correlated significantly with the dimensions “concern for changes in oneself”, “feelings about oneself”, “concern about the future”, and very weakly with social support. In addition, a negative correlation was observed between “feelings about oneself” and social support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety levels of women in our population are elevated. Pregnant women during the first trimester of pregnancy showed higher levels of fear of childbirth and concern about the future than multiparous women. Increased social support and decreased stress seem to influence “feeling about oneself”.
Background: Birth plans are used for pregnant women to express their wishes and expectations about childbirth. The aim of this study was to compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes between women with and without birth plans. Methods: A multicentre, retrospective case–control study at tertiary hospitals in southern Spain between 2009 and 2013 was conducted. A total of 457 pregnant women were included, 178 with and 279 without birth plans. Women with low-risk gestation, at full-term and having been in labour were included. Sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal variables were analysed and comparisons were established. Results: Women with birth plans were older, more educated and more commonly primiparous. Caesarean sections were less common in primiparous women with birth plans (18% vs. 29%, p = 0.027); however, no significant differences were found in instrumented births, 3rd–4th-degree tears or episiotomy rates. Newborns of primiparous women with birth plans obtained better results on 1 min Apgar scores, umbilical cord pH and advanced neonatal resuscitation. No significant differences were found on 5 min Apgar scores or other variables for multiparous women. Conclusions: Birth plans were related to less intervention, a more natural process of birth and better outcomes for mothers and newborns. Birth plans can improve the welfare of the mother and newborn, leading to birth in a more natural way.
Frequency of cytology testing has increased in the last few years. Screening for cervical cancer is associated with higher social status, education level, age, and not being foreign.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.