BackgroundFemoral neck fractures are rare injuries in children, but the high incidence of long term complications make it an important clinical entity. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of pediatric femur neck fractures that we managed over a 10 year period.MethodsThe study included 36 children (20 boys and 16 girls) who sustained femoral neck fractures and completed a minimum follow-up of one year. The children were treated either conservatively, or by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF). The outcomes were analyzed using Ratliff criteria and a detailed record of complications was kept for all patients.ResultsThe mean age of included patients was 10 years (range, 3 to 16 years) and the average follow-up was 3.2 years (range, 1.1 to 8.5 years). Based on Delbet's classification system, there were 0 type I (transepiphyseal), 16 type II, 11 type III, and 9 type IV fractures. There were 8 undisplaced fractures, 4 of which later displaced after being managed initially in a hip spica. A satisfactory outcome was obtained in 27 (75%) children. Avascular necrosis (AVN) was the most common complication. It was seen in 7 of our patients, all of whom had an unsatisfactory outcome. Other complications included three cases each of coxa vara, non-union, and arthritic changes; and one case each of infection, primary screw perforation of head, and premature epiphyseal closure. Complications were lowest in the group treated by ORIF. Only 2 patients managed exclusively by conservative treatment ultimately achieved a satisfactory outcome.ConclusionsWe believe that internal fixation of pediatric femoral neck fractures is preferred whenever feasible because conservative treatment carries a high risk of failure of reduction. Aggressive operative treatments aimed at anatomical reduction should be the goal and there should be no hesitation in choosing ORIF over CRIF. Outcome of patients is influenced primarily by development of AVN which occurs as an independent entity without much relation to the mode of treatment carried out.

No abstract

Purpose Neglected congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) is a common presentation in developing countries like India, with the primary concern of the patients being cosmesis. Little has been published regarding the management of such patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the results of bipolar release in this age group. Methods Over a period of five years, 14 patients older than ten years (range 10-19 years) with neglected CMT were operated on with bipolar release of sternocleidomastoid muscle and z-plasty lengthening of the sternal end. Postoperative protocol included head halter traction for three weeks followed by intensive physical therapy. Results were evaluated using a modified version of the system of Lee et al.Results At an average follow-up of around three years (range 1-5 years), excellent results were noted in three patients, good in seven, fair in two, and poor in two. Postoperative improvements in range of motion, head tilt, chin deviation and cosmesis were noted in all patients, and these improvements were statistically significant. No surgery-related complications or recurrences requiring surgery occurred in any of the patients. Conclusions This study concluded that patients with CMT presenting after ten years of age definitely benefit from surgery, and that bipolar release is an adequate and complication-free method for such patients.

No abstract

Level II.

A modified step-cut osteotomy is a safe and simple procedure which prevents lateral prominence and leads to good or excellent outcomes in most of the patients. The step-cut osteotomy procedure, mentioned here, might be beneficial over the conventional lateral closing wedge osteotomy in certain aspects like the lateral humeral condyle prominence, scar acceptibility and cosmesis. However, the apparent aforementioned advantages of this osteotomy over the conventional lateral closing wedge osteotomy needs to be further evaluated and confirmed on the basis of large, prospective randomised controlled trials.

Simple debulking surgery is sufficient for MDL.

Study DesignCross-sectional study.PurposeThe aim of the study was to determine relationship between the degrees of radiologically demonstrated anatomical lumbar canal stenosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its correlation with the patient's disability level, using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).Overview of LiteratureThe relationship between the imaging studies and clinical symptoms has been uncertain in patients suffering from symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis. There is a limited number of studies which correlates the degree of stenosis with simple reproducible scoring methods.MethodsFifty patients were selected from 350 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The patients answered the national-language translated form of ODI. The ratio of disability was interpreted, and the patients were grouped accordingly. They were subjected to MRI; and the anteroposterior diameters of the lumbar intervertebral disc spaces and the thecal sac cross sectional area were measured. Comparison was performed between the subdivisions of the degree of lumbar canal stenosis, based on the following: anteroposterior diameter (three groups: normal, relative stenosis and absolute stenosis); subdivisions of the degree of central canal stenosis, based on the thecal sac cross-sectional area, measured on axial views (three groups: normal, moderately stenotic and severely stenotic); and the ODI outcome, which was also presented in 20 percentiles.ResultsNo significant correlation was established between the radiologically depicted anatomical lumbar stenosis and the Oswestry Disability scores.ConclusionsMagnetic resonance imaging alone should not be considered in isolation when assessing and treating patients diagnosed with lumbar canal stenosis.