The recently completed European trial of interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SP multiple sclerosis) has given an opportunity to assess the impact of treatment on cerebral atrophy using serial MRI. Unenhanced T(1)-weighted brain imaging was acquired in a subgroup of 95 patients from five of the European centres; imaging was performed at 6-month intervals from month 0 to month 36. A blinded observer measured cerebral volume on four contiguous 5 mm cerebral hemisphere slices at each time point, using an algorithm with a high level of reproducibility and automation. There was a significant and progressive reduction in cerebral volume in both placebo and treated groups, with a mean reduction of 3.9 and 2.9%, respectively, by month 36 (P = 0.34 between groups). Exploratory subgroup analyses indicated that patients without gadolinium (Gd) enhancement at the baseline had a greater reduction of cerebral volume in the placebo group (mean reduction at month 36: placebo 5.1%, IFNbeta-1b 1.8%, P < 0.05) whereas those with Gd-enhancing lesions showed a trend to greater reduction of cerebral volume if the patient was on IFNbeta-1b (placebo 2.6%, IFNbeta-1b 3.7%; P > 0.05). These results are consistent with ongoing tissue loss in both arms of this study of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. This finding is concordant with previous observations that disease progression, although delayed, is not halted by IFNbeta. The different pattern seen in patients with and without baseline gadolinium enhancement suggests that part of the cerebral volume reduction observed in IFNbeta-treated patients may be due to the anti-inflammatory/antioedematous effect of the drug. Longer periods of observation and larger groups of patients may be needed to detect the effects of treatment on cerebral atrophy in this population of patients with advanced disease.
Campath 1H treatment was associated with a sustained and marked reduction in the volume of Gd enhancement, indicating suppression of active inflammation. Nevertheless, many patients developed increasing brain and spinal cord atrophy, T1 hypointensity, and disability. This study highlights the potential role for novel MR techniques in monitoring the effect of treatment on the pathologic process in MS.
The change of brain lesion load, measured on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using computer-assisted techniques, is a widely used secondary endpoint for phase III clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS). Collection, transfer, and analysis of the electronic data across multiple centers have all proved challenging and give rise to potential errors. However, many new acquisition schemes and postprocessing techniques have been developed; these may reduce scan times and result in better lesion conspicuity or lessen the human interaction needed for data analysis. This review considers many aspects of the use of MRI in clinical trials for MS and provides international consensus guidelines, derived from a task force of the European Magnetic Resonance Networks in Multiple Sclerosis (MAGNIMS) together with a group of North American experts. The main points considered are the organization of correctly powered trials and selection of participating sites; the appropriate choice of pulse sequences and image acquisition protocol given the current state of technology; quality assurance for data acquisition and analysis; accuracy and reproducibility of lesion load assessments; and the potential for the application of quantitative methods to other MRI-derived measures of disease burden.
A randomized placebo‐controlled trial of interferon‐β1b was performed on 718 patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with follow‐up of up to 3 years. In addition to clinical variables, serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed to determine the effect of treatment on the pathological evolution of the disease. All patients eligible for MRI had annual proton density/T2‐weighted brain scans from which total lesion volume was measured and the number of new and enlarging lesions noted. A subgroup of 125 patients also underwent monthly gadolinium‐enhanced and proton density/T2‐weighted brain MRI from months 0 to 6 and 18 to 24 to determine the effect of treatment on the frequency of new lesion activity, defined as new enhancing lesions and new/enlarging T2 lesions not enhancing with gadolinium. The difference in total lesion volume between treatment groups was highly significant. In the placebo group, there was an increase of 15% from baseline to last scan, whereas in the interferon‐β1b group, a reduction of 2% was seen. Within the placebo group, there was a significant year‐on‐year increase in total lesion volume, with a mean increase of 16% at year 3 compared with baseline. In the treated group, there was a significant reduction at year 1 (4%) and year 2 (5%) compared with baseline; the 2% decrease at year 3 was not significant. The number of new or enlarging proton density/T2 lesions was also significantly reduced by treatment. In the frequent MRI subgroup, treatment was associated with a significant 65% reduction in new lesion activity between months 1 and 6, and 78% reduction from months 19 to 24. Interferon‐β1b has a substantial and sustained effect on reducing the accumulation of new inflammatory disease foci in secondary progressive MS. This therapeutic mechanism may contribute to the positive clinical benefits of treatment on the progression of sustained neurological disability and relapse activity that were also identified in this trial.
IFNbeta-1b reduced the number of new enhancing lesions, with a greater effect on small lesions. However, when a new enhancing lesion did become established, treatment with IFNbeta-1b did not alter its subsequent course.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.