This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
A majority of kidney transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitor‐based immunosuppression. However, some do not tolerate calcineurin inhibitors and require other immunosuppressive strategies. Until recently, alternative approaches have been associated with inferior outcomes, but recent methods have effectively utilized belatacept in calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant patients. Though promising, belatacept uptake has been limited by higher acute rejection rates, unavailability due to production shortages, and logistical challenges as a result of intravenous infusion requirements. Interestingly, its predecessor abatacept is clinically available in subcutaneous formulation to treat autoimmune disorders but has not been used in clinical transplantation. Here we report on a series of 9 calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant transplant recipients converted to abatacept early after transplant as rescue immunosuppression during periods of belatacept unavailability. Retrospective review revealed successful allograft salvage and 100% patient and graft survival (median 115 months) after conversion to abatacept. Patients received abatacept for a median duration of 82 months with stable, long‐term renal allograft function, a single cellular rejection episode, and no clinically apparent protective immunity concerns. Hence our findings suggest that future clinical studies utilizing abatacept either de novo or as conversion therapy in transplant recipients should be considered.
Pulmonary hypertension affects about one in four patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and significantly increases the risk of death. Kidney transplantation is the recommended management option for patients with progressive or end‐stage kidney disease. However, the resource‐limited nature of kidney transplantation and its intensive peri‐operative and posttransplantation management motivates careful consideration of potential candidates’ medical conditions to optimally utilize available graft organs. Since pulmonary hypertension is known to increase peri‐operative morbidity and mortality among patients living with chronic kidney disease, we performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the impact of pretransplantation pulmonary hypertension on posttransplantation outcome. All patients who underwent single‐organ kidney transplantation at our center in calendar years 2010 and 2011 were identified and the presence of pulmonary hypertension was determined from pretransplantation echocardiography. Outcome was assessed at 5 years following kidney transplantation. Of 350 patients who were included, 117 (33%) had evidence of pulmonary hypertension. The risk of death, graft dysfunction, or graft failure at 5 years after kidney transplantation was higher among those with pulmonary hypertension, primarily owing to an increased risk of graft dysfunction. Importantly, in this institutional cohort of kidney transplant recipients, pretransplant pulmonary hypertension was not associated with a difference in posttransplant survival at 5 years. While institutional and regional differences in outcome can be expected, this report suggests that carefully selected patients with pulmonary hypertension receive similar long‐term benefits from kidney transplantation.
Tubulointerstitial nephritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has been linked to the use of 5-ASA derivatives. Various aspects of this theory have been challenged with a potential role for the underlying autoimmune disorder. Steroids are the mainstay of treatment and mycophenolate mofetil might be an effective alternative. We report a patient who responded well to mycophenolate despite continuing mesalamine, the suspected offending agent.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.