Background:To establish the contribution of eight founder alleles in three DNA damage repair genes (BRCA1, CHEK2 and NBS1) to prostate cancer in Poland, and to measure the impact of these variants on survival among patients.Methods:Three thousand seven hundred fifty men with prostate cancer and 3956 cancer-free controls were genotyped for three founder alleles in BRCA1 (5382insC, 4153delA, C61G), four alleles in CHEK2 (1100delC, IVS2+1G>A, del5395, I157T), and one allele in NBS1 (657del5).Results:The NBS1 mutation was detected in 53 of 3750 unselected cases compared with 23 of 3956 (0.6%) controls (odds ratio (OR)=2.5; P=0.0003). A CHEK2 mutation was seen in 383 (10.2%) unselected cases and in 228 (5.8%) controls (OR=1.9; P<0.0001). Mutation of BRCA1 (three mutations combined) was not associated with the risk of prostate cancer (OR=0.9; P=0.8). In a subgroup analysis, the 4153delA mutation was associated with early-onset (age ⩽60 years) prostate cancer (OR=20.3, P=0.004). The mean follow-up was 54 months. Mortality was significantly worse for carriers of a NBS1 mutation than for non-carriers (HR=1.85; P=0.008). The 5-year survival for men with an NBS1 mutation was 49%, compared with 72% for mutation-negative cases.Conclusion:A mutation in NBS1 predisposes to aggressive prostate cancer. These data are relevant to the prospect of adapting personalised medicine to prostate cancer prevention and treatment.

Despite ongoing trials of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer (BC), the extent of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 (PARP-1) protein expression in BCs, which may influence treatment results, is not known. The purpose of this report is to assess expression of PARP-1 in BC including BRCA1-associated, triple negative (TN), and basal-like tumors. Immunohistochemistry with a PARP-1 antibody on tissue microarrays from 130 BRCA1-associated and 594 BRCA1-non-related BCs was used. The vast majority of breast carcinomas expressed high level of nuclear PARP-1 protein and a small percentage of tumors exhibited both nuclear and cytoplasmic PARP-1 expression. There was a significant difference between the mean nuclear PARP-1 quickscore in BRCA1-associated versus BRCA1-non-associated carcinomas in all tumors (P < 0.0001), in the basal-like group (P = 0.0086), TN (P = 0.0015), and non-basal-like groups (P = 0.016) but not in the non-TN group. Among BRCA1-associated BCs, low PARP-1 expression was found in 18.5% of all cases, 18.9% of basal-like and 21% of TN cancers. Among BRCA1-non-related tumors, low PARP-1 expression was found in 8.8% of all cases, 3.1% of basal-like, and 2.7% of TN cancers. PARP-1 expression is significantly associated with BRCA1 status in basal-like and TN BCs. The assessment of PARP-1 expression in tumor samples may improve the selection of BC patients for PARP inhibitor therapy.

The 10-year survival rate among women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation is similar to that of patients without a BRCA1 mutation. Among women with a BRCA1 mutation, survival was much improved after oophorectomy.

CHEK2 is a tumor suppressor gene whose functions are central to the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis following DNA damage. Mutations in CHEK2 have been associated with cancers at many sites, including breast and prostate cancers, but the relationship between CHEK2 and gastric cancer has not been extensively studied. In Poland, there are four known founder alleles of CHEK2; three alleles are protein truncating (1100delC, IVS2G>A, del5395) and the other is a missense variant (I157T). We examined the frequencies of four Polish founder mutations in the CHEK2 gene in 658 unselected gastric cancer patients, in 154 familial gastric cancer patients and in 8,302 controls. A CHEK2 mutation was seen in 57 of 658 (8.7 %) unselected patients with gastric cancer compared to 480 of 8,302 (5.8 %) controls (OR 1.6, p = 0.004). A CHEK2 mutation was present in 19 of 154 (12.3 %) familial cases (OR = 2.3, p = 0.001). The odds ratio for early onset (<50 years) gastric cancer was higher (2.1, p = 0.01), than for cases diagnosed at age of 50 or above (OR 1.4, p = 0.05). Truncating mutations of CHEK2 were associated with higher risk (OR = 2.1, p = 0.02) than the missense mutation I157T (OR = 1.4, p = 0.04). CHEK2 mutations predispose to gastric cancer, in particular to young-onset cases.

To optimize genetic testing, it is necessary to establish the spectrum of breast cancer‐predisposing mutations in particular ethnic groups. We studied 1,018 women with a strong family history for breast cancer (families with hereditary breast cancer; HBC) from genetically homogenous population of Poland, which is populated by ethnic Slavs, for mutations in 14 cancer susceptibility genes. Additionally, we compared the frequency of candidate pathogenic variants in breast cancer cases and controls. Germline mutations were detected in 512 of 1,018 probands with breast cancer (50.3%), including BRCA1/2 mutations detected in 420 families and non‐BRCA mutations seen in 92 families. Thirteen BRCA1/2 founder mutations represented 84% of all BRCA1/2‐positive cases. Seven founder mutations of CHEK2, PALB2, NBN and RECQL represented 73% of all non‐BRCA‐positive cases. Odds ratios for hereditary breast cancer were 87.6 for BRCA1, 15.4 for PALB2, 7.2 for CHEK2, 2.8 for NBN and 15.8 for RECQL. Odds ratios for XRCC2, BLM and BARD1 were below 1.3. In summary, we found that 20 founder mutations in six genes (BRCA1/2, CHEK2, PALB2, NBN and RECQL) are responsible for 82% of Polish hereditary breast cancer families. A simple test for these 20 mutations will facilitate genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in Poland. It may also facilitate genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in other Slavic populations and women of Slavic descent worldwide.

Germline mutations in BRCA1 were already linked to basal-like subtype of immunophenotypic molecular classification of breast cancer (BC). However, it is not known whether mutations in other BC susceptibility genes are associated with molecular subtypes of this cancer. We tested the hypothesis that distinct mutations in another BC susceptibility gene involved in DNA repair, i.e., CHEK2 may be associated with particular immunophenotypic molecular subtypes of this cancer. Two groups of patients: 1255 with BCs and 5496 healthy controls were genotyped for four CHEK2 mutations (I157T and three truncating mutations: 1100delC, IVS2 + 1G > A, del5395). BCs were tested by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays for ER, PR, HER-2, EGFR, and CK5/6 and were assigned to appropriate subtypes of immunophenotypic molecular classification. There was a significant association between CHEK2 mutations and the immunophenotypic molecular classification (P = 0.004). CHEK2-associated cancers were predominantly luminal (108/117 = 92.3%). CHEK2-I157T variant was associated with the luminal A subtype (P = 0.01), whereas CHEK2-truncating mutations were associated with the luminal B subtype (P = 0.005). Comparing the prevalence of CHEK2 mutations in BC with controls revealed that carriers of an I157T variant had OR of 1.80 for luminal A subtype and carriers of truncating mutations had OR of 6.26 for luminal B subtype of BC. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that specific mutations in the same susceptibility gene are associated with different immunophenotypic molecular subtypes of BC. This association represents independent evidence supporting the biological significance of immunophenotypic molecular classification of BC.

The G84E mutation predisposes to prostate cancer in Poland, but accounts for only a small proportion of cases. We expect that the G84E founder mutation might be present in other Slavic populations.

The immunophenotypic predictive profile of BRCA1-associated cancers including major predictive markers, i.e., PARP-1, EGFR, c-kit, HER-2, and steroid hormones (ER/PR) that may have therapeutic relevance has not yet been reported in a comprehensive study. Using immunohistochemistry, we examined the expression of these proteins in a large cohort of BRCA1-associated breast cancers. PARP-1 immunoreactivity was found in 81.9%, EGFR in 43.6%, ER/PR in 17.9%, c-kit in 14.7%, and overexpression of HER-2 in 3.6% of cancers. For all markers studied, 8.2% of tumors were negative. Expression of only one predictive marker was found in 29.7% of cancers, and most frequently, it was PARP-1 (20.8%). In 62.1% of tumors, more than one predictive marker was expressed: PARP-1 and EGFR in 30.4%, PARP-1, and hormone receptors in 13.3% and PARP-1 with c-kit in 7.5% of all tumors. Coexpression of two or more other predictive markers was rare. There were significant differences in the median age at diagnosis of BRCA1-associated cancer between patients with ER+ vs. ER− and grades 1–2 vs. grade 3 tumors. These results demonstrate that BRCA1-associated cancers differ with respect to expression of proteins that are regarded as targets for specific therapies and that 92% of patients with BRCA1-associated cancers may benefit from one or several options for specific therapy (in addition to DNA damaging agents, e.g., cisplatin). About 8% of cancers which do not express therapeutic target proteins may not respond to such therapies. Knowledge of the immunophenotypic predictive profile may help with the recruitment of patients for trials of targeted therapies.