The purpose of this study was to derive a complete set of correction and perturbation factors for output factors (OF) and dose profiles. Modern small field detectors were investigated including a plastic scintillator (Exradin W1, SI), a liquid ionization chamber (microLion 31018, PTW), an unshielded diode (Exradin D1V, SI) and a synthetic diamond (microDiamond 60019, PTW). A Monte Carlo (MC) beam model was commissioned for use in small fields following two commissioning procedures: (1) using intermediate and moderately small fields (down to 2 × 2 cm(2)) and (2) using only small fields (0.5 × 0.5 cm(2) -2 × 2 cm(2)). In the latter case the detectors were explicitly modelled in the dose calculation. The commissioned model was used to derive the correction and perturbation factors with respect to a small point in water as suggested by the Alfonso formalism. In MC calculations the design of two detectors was modified in order to minimize or eliminate the corrections needed. The results of this study indicate that a commissioning process using large fields does not lead to an accurate estimation of the source size, even if a 2 × 2 cm(2) field is included. Furthermore, the detector should be explicitly modelled in the calculations. On the output factors, the scintillator W1 needed the smallest correction (+0.6%), followed by the microDiamond (+1.3%). Larger corrections were observed for the microLion (+2.4%) and diode D1V (-2.4%). On the profiles, significant corrections were observed out of the field on the gradient and tail regions. The scintillator needed the smallest corrections (-4%), followed by the microDiamond (-11%), diode D1V (+13%) and microLion (-15%). The major perturbations reported were due to volume averaging and high density materials that surround the active volumes. These effects presented opposite trends in both OF and profiles. By decreasing the radius of the microLion to 0.85 mm we could modify the volume averaging effect in order to achieve a discrepancy less than 1% for OF and 5% for profiles compared to water. Similar results were observed for the diode D1V if the radius was increased to 1 mm.

A two-color reflection scanning protocol can be suggested for EBT3 radiochromic film dosimetry using the red channel for doses less than 2 Gy and the green channel for higher doses. The precision and accuracy are significantly improved in the low dose region following such a protocol.

These results suggest that the TARGIT dose underestimates the physical dose to water from the INTRABEAM source. Understanding the correlation between the TARGIT and physical dose is important for any studies wishing to make dosimetric comparisons between the INTRABEAM and other radiation emitting devices.

Clinically relevant differences were observed between similar scintillator dosimeters in photon fields smaller than 1 ×  1 cm . Further research on PSDs is needed that can explain the origin of these differences especially related to the Cherenkov spectrum dependencies on the optical fiber technical characteristics.

Results of the authors' study showed that an accurate delivery utilizing an add-on tertiary electron collimator is possible using Monte Carlo calculated plans and inverse optimization, which brings MERT closer to becoming a viable option for physicians in treating superficial malignancies.

Purpose To quantify and verify the dosimetric impact of high‐dose rate (HDR) source positional uncertainty in brachytherapy, and to introduce a model for three‐dimensional (3D) position tracking of the HDR source based on a two‐dimensional (2D) measurement. This model has been utilized for the development of a comprehensive source quality assurance (QA) method using radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry including assessment of different digitization uncertainties. Methods An algorithm was developed and verified to generate 2D dose maps of the mHDR‐V2 192Ir source (Elekta, Veenendaal, Netherlands) based on the AAPM TG‐43 formalism. The limits of the dosimetric error associated with source (0.9 mm diameter) positional uncertainty were evaluated and experimentally verified with EBT3 film measurements for 6F (2.0 mm diameter) and 4F (1.3 mm diameter) size catheters at the surface (4F, 6F) and 10 mm further (4F only). To quantify this uncertainty, a source tracking model was developed to incorporate the unique geometric features of all isodose lines (IDLs) within any given 2D dose map away from the source. The tracking model normalized the dose map to its maximum, then quantified the IDLs using blob analysis based on features such as area, perimeter, weighted centroid, elliptic orientation, and circularity. The Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) between these features and source coordinates (x, y, z, θy, θz) were calculated. To experimentally verify the accuracy of the tracking model, EBT3 film pieces were positioned within a Solid Water® (SW) phantom above and below the source and they were exposed simultaneously. Results The maximum measured dosimetric variations on the 6F and 4F catheter surfaces were 39.8% and 36.1%, respectively. At 10 mm further, the variation reduced to 2.6% for the 4F catheter which is in agreement with the calculations. The source center (x, y) was strongly correlated with the low IDL‐weighted centroid (PCC = 0.99), while the distance to source (z) was correlated with the IDL areas (PCC = 0.96) and perimeters (PCC = 0.99). The source orientation θy was correlated with the difference between high and low IDL‐weighted centroids (PCC = 0.98), while θz was correlated with the elliptic orientation of the 60–90% IDLs (PCC = 0.97) for a maximum distance of z = 5 mm. Beyond 5 mm, IDL circularity was significant, therefore limiting the determination of θz (PCC ≤ 0.48). The measured positional errors from the film sets above and below the source indicated a source position at the bottom of the catheter (−0.24 ± 0.07 mm). Conclusions Isodose line features of a 2D dose map away from the HDR source can reveal its spatial coordinates. RCF was shown to be a suitable dosimeter for source tracking and dosimetry. This technique offers a novel source QA method and has the potential to be used for QA of commercial and customized applicators.

Purpose: To introduce a model that reproducibly linearizes the response from radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry systems at extended dose range. To introduce a correction method, generated from the same scanned images, which corrects for scanner temporal response variation and scanner bed inhomogeneity. Methods: Six calibration curves were established for different lot numbers of EBT3 GAFCHRO-MIC TM film model based on four EPSON scanners [10000XL (2 units), 11000XL, 12000XL] at three different centers. These films were calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water based on TG51 protocol or TRS398 with dose ranges up to 40 Gy. The film response was defined in terms of a proposed normalized pixel value (nPV RGB ) as a summation of first-order equations based on information from red, green, and blue channels. The fitting parameters of these equations are chosen in a way that makes the film response equal to dose at the time of calibration. An integrated set of correction factors (one per color channel) was also introduced. These factors account for the spatial and temporal changes in scanning states during calibration and measurements. The combination of nPV RGB and this "fingerprint" correction formed the basis of this new protocol and it was tested against net optical density (netOD X¼R;G;B ) single-channel dosimetry in terms of accuracy, precision, scanner response variability, scanner bed inhomogeneity, noise, and long-term stability. Results: Incorporating multichannel features (RGB) into the normalized pixel value produced linear response to absorbed dose (slope of 1) in all six RCF dosimetry systems considered in this study. The "fingerprint" correction factors of each of these six systems displayed unique patterns at the time of calibration. The application of nPV RGB to all of these six systems could achieve a level of accuracy of AE 2.0% in the dose range of interest within modeled uncertainty level of 2.0%-3.0% depending on the dose level. Consistent positioning of control and measurement film pieces and integrating the multichannel correction into the response function formalism mitigated possible scanner response variations of as much as AE 10% at lower doses and scanner bed inhomogeneity of AE 8% to the established level of uncertainty at the time of calibration. The system was also able to maintain the same level of accuracy after 3 and 6 months post calibration.Conclusions: Combining response linearity with the integrated correction for scanner response variation lead to a sustainable and practical RCF dosimetry system that mitigated systematic response shifts and it has the potential to reduce errors in reporting relative information from the film response.

Direct determination of the source intensity distribution of clinical linear accelerators is still a challenging problem for small field beam modeling. Current techniques most often involve special equipment and are difficult to implement in the clinic. In this work we present a maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) approach to the source reconstruction problem utilizing small fields and a simple experimental set-up. The MLEM algorithm iteratively ray-traces photons from the source plane to the exit plane and extracts corrections based on photon fluence profile measurements. The photon fluence profiles were determined by dose profile film measurements in air using a high density thin foil as build-up material and an appropriate point spread function (PSF). The effect of other beam parameters and scatter sources was minimized by using the smallest field size ([Formula: see text] cm(2)). The source occlusion effect was reproduced by estimating the position of the collimating jaws during this process. The method was first benchmarked against simulations for a range of typical accelerator source sizes. The sources were reconstructed with an accuracy better than 0.12 mm in the full width at half maximum (FWHM) to the respective electron sources incident on the target. The estimated jaw positions agreed within 0.2 mm with the expected values. The reconstruction technique was also tested against measurements on a Varian Novalis Tx linear accelerator and compared to a previously commissioned Monte Carlo model. The reconstructed FWHM of the source agreed within 0.03 mm and 0.11 mm to the commissioned electron source in the crossplane and inplane orientations respectively. The impact of the jaw positioning, experimental and PSF uncertainties on the reconstructed source distribution was evaluated with the former presenting the dominant effect.