Objective To determine the pain responses of lambs to mulesing, and the effectiveness of potential analgesic treatments.Procedures Merino lambs (n = 64) were allocated at 5 weeks of age to eight treatment groups: 1) sham mules; 2) conventional mules; 3) topical anaesthetic, incorporating lignocaine, bupivicaine, adrenaline and cetrimide, applied immediately after mulesing; 4) flunixin + topical anaesthetic, with flunixin administered 2.5 mg/kg s.c. 90 min before mulesing; 5) carprofen + topical anaesthetic, with carprofen administered 4 mg/kg s.c. 90 min before mulesing; 6) carprofen, administered as above; 7) flunixin, administered as above; and 8) carprofen + flunixin, administered as above. Plasma cortisol was measured at 0, 0.5, 6, 12 and 24 h relative to mulesing. Animal behaviour, including posture, was recorded for 12 h after mulesing. ResultsThe conventional mules lambs exhibited large increases in plasma cortisol, reduced lying and increased standing with a hunched back compared with sham mules animals. Topical anaesthetic reduced the cortisol peak to mulesing and hunched standing, and increased lying compared with the conventional mules treatment, but generally did not result in values equivalent to sham mules animals. Carprofen, flunixin, and carprofen + flunixin treatments did not reduce the cortisol response to mulesing but substantially ameliorated some changes in behavioural postures. Flunixin + topical anaesthetic reduced the cortisol peak following mulesing and substantially ameliorated most changes in behavioural postures. Carprofen + topical anaesthetic abolished the cortisol peak following mulesing and substantially ameliorated most changes in behavioural postures. All mulesed animals lost weight in the week after mulesing regardless of analgesic administration, but there were no significant differences in growth rate between any of the eight treatments over the 3 weeks after mulesing.Conclusions Analgesics can moderate the pain response of lambs to mulesing. The welfare outcome for lambs of mulesing could be improved by use of a combination of local anaesthetic and long acting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug, meloxicam, in alleviating pain and inflammation and on production‐related variables in a model of sterile acute inflammation in sheep. Methods Groups of 12 mature Merino ewes received 0, 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 mg/kg meloxicam subcutaneously 90 min before injection of 0.1 mL turpentine subcutaneously on the anterior aspect of the proximal phalanx of a forelimb. Pain‐ and inflammation‐related variables were assessed at −18, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h relative to meloxicam administration. Daily feed intake and body weight change 7 days later were also assessed. Pain‐related variables measured were weight borne on each forelimb, lameness score, time each forelimb was raised in a 20‐s interval and tolerance to a noxious mechanical stimulus. Inflammation‐related variables measured were skin temperature, limb circumference, body temperature, plasma haptoglobin concentration and peripheral blood leucocyte parameters. Results Meloxicam was effective in improving all pain‐related variables. A dose‐dependent response was seen between 0 and 1.0 mg/kg, with no additional benefit provided by 1.5 mg/kg. At a dose rate of 1.0 mg/kg, meloxicam improved weight borne on the turpentine‐treated limb by 14%, reduced the time the treated limb was held in a non‐weight‐bearing posture by 46%, reduced the lameness score by 58% and improved tolerance to pressure by 52%. No significant effects of meloxicam on inflammatory variables or appetite were observed. Conclusions Using a validated pain model, the data suggested that 1.0 mg/kg meloxicam provided significant analgesic benefits to sheep.

The welfare of suckling lambs that were non-surgically mulesed by intradermal injection of cetrimide was measurably poorer than control lambs.

In weaner sheep, carprofen ameliorated the behavioural responses, but was unable to provide relief from the intense and sustained physiological responses to non-surgical mulesing by intradermal injection of cetrimide. Systemic side-effects may be unavoidable with formulations based on quaternary ammonium compounds that are designed to reduce the risk of fly strike in sheep by remodelling breech tissue through induction of tissue necrosis.

Wool biting is a behaviour that can develop in housed sheep, in which sheep start to bite and eat the wool of others. The aim of this study was to determine whether (i) supplementing the diet of housed sheep with fibre and (ii) increasing feeding frequency would help to reduce wool biting, aggressive behaviours and wool damage. In a 2 × 2 factorial experiment, 40 Merino wethers were either fed with lucerne-based pellets only, or with pellets supplemented with barley straw. They received their pellets either on a low feeding frequency basis (once a day Monday to Friday mornings, double ration on Friday afternoon, nothing Saturdays and Sundays), or on a high feeding frequency basis (twice a day, every day). The sheep were housed in 4 treatment pens, each with 10 animals. Wool biting and aggressive behaviours were recorded through direct observation and the sheep were scored for wool damage twice a week during the 15-week study. The provision of fibre had a significant effect on reducing wool biting (P<0.001) and wool damage score (P<0.001). There was no consistent effect of feeding frequency on wool biting or wool damage, and no fibre × feeding frequency interactions. Whereas wool biting in general increased with time during the study (P<0.001), levels of aggressive behaviour showed no consistent time trend, and there were no effects of fibre or feeding frequency treatments. It is concluded that wool biting is largely a redirected behaviour in concentrate-fed housed sheep deprived of adequate levels of activity or oral stimulus, and that the provision of roughage will reduce the development of wool biting and improve animal welfare in housed experimental sheep.

In this study, we examined the potential of several widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other analgesics to reduce pain and stress in sheep after surgery. Because mulesing involves a greater degree of tissue trauma than other surgical husbandry procedures such as castration or tail-docking, it provides a more rigorous and conservative test to identify potentially useful analgesic strategies in sheep. Merino lambs (5 weeks of age) were randomised into eight treatment groups: (1) carprofen; (2) flunixin; (3) ketoprofen; (4) buprenorphine; (5) xylazine; (6) lignocaine epidural; (7) saline control; (8) sham control. The NSAIDs were administered 1.5 h before mulesing, buprenorphine 0.75 h and xylazine and lignocaine 0.25 h before mulesing. Pain- and discomfort-related behaviours were recorded for 12 h after mulesing, and plasma cortisol concentrations were measured before mulesing and 0.5, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after mulesing. The results indicated that no single analgesic treatment provided satisfactory analgesia during both the surgical mulesing procedure and the ensuing period of pain associated with the inflammatory phase. However, there were indications that two NSAIDs (carprofen and flunixin) showed good potential as analgesics during the inflammatory phase. A combination of short- and long-acting analgesics may be needed to provide more complete pain relief. In conclusion, the administration of some NSAIDs offers the potential for good analgesia in sheep for the inflammatory phase following the tissue trauma of surgical husbandry procedures. Other analgesic options need to be considered if the acute stress response to the procedure is to be reduced.

The behaviour of the SLS group was similar to that of the unmulesed Controls and their physiological responses were intermediate between the Mulesed lambs receiving post-surgical analgesia and the Controls.

Ewe lambs born to Merino ewes grazed at 10 or 20 sheep/ha were weaned at three months (L-, H-) and randomized to low or high stocking rate treatments (-L, -H) until 15 months old. Ewes from each of the four groups (LL, LH, HL and HH) then grazed at 10 or 20 sheep/ha until nine years old. Liveweight in early adult life and some body dimensions were reduced by a low plane of nutrition during rearing. The differences in liveweight declined with time and were not significant after 2% years in ewes stocked as adults at 10/ha or after 5% years in ewes stocked at 20/ha. Wool production and growth rates of lambs were reduced when ewes were stocked at the high stocking rate, but were not affected by rearing treatment. Wool production per sheep was about 30% greater at the lower stocking rate but about 33% less when expressed on a unit area basis. Fibre diameter and fleece length were reduced by a high stocking rate in adult life but were not affected by rearing treatment. Yield was not affected by stocking rate at any time. A number of subjective assessments of wool quality were also recorded; quality declined at a high stocking rate but was not affected by rearing treatment. Trends in wool production and quality with age of ewe are reported.