No abstract

Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment. Patching, which is modestly effective, is the current treatment of amblyopia in children. There is no clinically approved treatment for adults. The present study is a clinical trial (non-sham controlled and non-randomized) that assessed the efficacy of binocular training for improvement of the visual acuity in children and adults with amblyopia. Twenty-two amblyopic subjects ranging in age from 5 to 73 (mean: 36.2) years for whom patching and/or surgical treatments did not correct their visual impairment completed an average of 14.5 sessions of binocular training over a period of 4 to 6 weeks. Random dot kinematograms were presented dichoptically to the two eyes and the participants' task was to identify the direction of motion of the targets. Mean visual acuity improvement was 0.34 LogMAR (range: 0.1-0.58 LogMAR) and was shown to persist 6 months following the cessation of binocular training. Our study provides results in a large number of patients that confirm the clinical effectiveness of binocular training as a treatment for amblyopia in improving visual acuity in both children and adults. Moreover, this study is the first to demonstrate that the improvements in visual function were maintained for 6 months in the absence of any additional treatment.

To evaluate the pattern of losses associated with glaucomatous injury in patients with progressing glaucoma, functional losses were examined in 14 patients with progressing glaucoma using tests for which detection should be selectively mediated by one of three psychophysical mechanisms. Red-on-white increments, blue-on-white increments and critical flicker frequency were used to isolate the responses of the red-green chromatic mechanism, the blue-on chromatic mechanism, and the high-frequency flicker achromatic mechanism. For our 3.1 degrees circular stimuli, chromatic defects were found in a greater number of the patients with glaucoma than were achromatic defects. We evaluated these defects in terms of two existing hypotheses: preferential loss and reduced redundancy. The greater sensitivity to glaucomatous injury of chromatic tests, compared to achromatic tests, found in this and other studies and the apparent discrepancy between anatomical and psychophysical studies can be parsimoniously explained by differences in cortical summation of ganglion cell responses for the chromatic and achromatic pathways.

Purpose-To evaluate the ability of the cortical pooling model to predict the effects of random, mild ganglion cell loss, we compared the predictions of the model with the age-related loss and variability in achromatic and chromatic contrast sensitivity.Methods-The relative sensitivity to small (0.5°) and large (3.0°) stimuli was compared in older (mean = 67 years, n = 27) and younger (mean = 23 years, n = 32) adults. Contrast sensitivity for modulations along the luminance, equiluminant L-cone, and equiluminant S-cone axes was assessed at the fovea and at four peripheral locations (12°).Results-When the stimuli were large, threshold measurements obtained from all participants were reliable and well within the range of modulations along the chromatic axes that could be produced by the phosphors of the CRT. For the large stimuli, neither long-nor short-term variability increased as a function of age. Increasing the size of the stimulus did not decrease the magnitude of the agerelated losses when the stimulus was chromatic, and visual losses observed with large chromatic stimuli were not different from those obtained with small achromatic stimuli. Moreover, chromatic contrast sensitivity assessments identified significant visual losses in four individuals who were not identified by achromatic contrast sensitivity assessments and only missed identifying one individual with significant losses in achromatic contrast sensitivity.Conclusions-The declines in achromatic and chromatic sensitivity as a function of age (0.4 -0.7 dB per decade) were similar to those obtained in previous studies of achromatic and chromatic perimetry and are consistent with the loss of retinal ganglion cells reported in histologic studies. The results of this study are consistent with the predictions the cortical pooling model makes for both variability and contrast sensitivity. These findings emphasize that selective visual impairments do not necessarily reflect preferential damage to a single ganglion cell class and that it is important to include the influence of higher cortical processing when quantifying the relation between ganglion cells and visual function. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptOptom Vis Sci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2007 July 1. Published in final edited form as:Optom Vis Sci. 2006 July ; 83(7): 444-454. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript function has been studied extensively in patients with glaucoma, and it is well established that significant declines in visual sensitivity are often present when glaucomatous ganglion cell loss is mild. 1-6 To further our understanding of this relation and how to better detect ganglion cell loss, we examined the effects of mild ganglion cell loss associated with aging and compared these findings with the predictions of the cortical pooling model of the relation between ganglion cell loss and visual sensitivity.To extend our understanding of the relation between ganglion cell loss and visual sensitivity, we have chosen to evaluat...