No abstract

No abstract

The concept of the high-risk CEA must be critically reexamined. Although 29% of patients for CEA were high risk as defined by others, we found no evidence that this influenced the results after CEA. Patients with significant medical comorbidities, contralateral carotid occlusion, and high carotid lesions can undergo operation without increased complications. If a high-risk group exists, it is small and restricted to reoperation or radiated neck (4% in this series). With this possible exception, carotid angioplasty stenting should be restricted to randomized clinical trials.

No abstract

BACKGROUND Thrombus regression in heparin-treated, acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity is poorly documented in the literature; different rates of thrombus resolution and recanalization are reported. METHODS AND RESULTS In a prospective follow-up study, duplex scanning was used to evaluate the thrombus regression in patients with documented acute femoropopliteal thrombosis. Eighty vein segments in 20 legs of 18 patients were subjected to repeat duplex scans at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 26 weeks after diagnosis; 49 segments showed thrombus at diagnosis. The popliteal vein showed the highest thrombus load at diagnosis, followed in descending order by the superficial femoral, profunda femoris, and common femoral vein segments (p less than 0.001). Thrombus regression was significant (p less than 0.001) in all segments and proceeded at an exponential rate that was equal in the different vein segments of the upper leg. Both thrombus resolution and recanalization appeared to be a function of the initial thrombus load and could not be related to individual vein segments. Recanalization was seen in 23 of 31 initially occluded segments and occurred within the first 6 weeks after diagnosis in 20 of 23 segments. Extension of thrombus despite anticoagulant therapy was observed in 15 vein segments and was not related to the initial thrombosis score (p = 0.1) or individual vein segments (p = 0.23). Thrombus extension in seven patients with prethrombotic conditions was not different (p = 0.9) from the other patients. CONCLUSIONS Duplex scanning is an important noninvasive tool to quantify thrombus regression in acute deep venous thrombosis in detail without unnecessary discomfort to the patient.

This study was undertaken (1) to determine whether correction of infrainguinal bypass stenoses detected with color duplex scanning (CDS) improved graft survival and (2) to define the natural history of grafts that did not undergo revision. Methods: Over a 39-month period 462 color-flow duplex scans were obtained on 170 limbs with autogenous vein grafts. Grafts were scanned within 3 months of operation, at 6 and 12 months, and then yearly. Doubling of the velocity at any point in the graft-arterial system compared with the velocity immediately above or below (velocity ratio-> 2.0) was the criterion adopted for identification of a hemodynamically significant (_> 50%) diameter reduction. Results: One hundred ten stenoses were detected in 62 (36%) of the limbs, of which 9 (8%) were in native vessels, 30 (27%) were at the anastomoses, and 71 (65%) were in the graft itself. Seventy-seven percent of the stenoses were detected in the first year. Twenty-four (39%) of the grafts with positive scans were revised. During follow-up, occlusions occurred in 10 (9%) of the 108 grafts with negative scans (NEG), in 2 (8%) of the 24 revised grafts with positive scans (PK), and in 10 (26%) of the 38 non-revised grafts with positive scans (PNR). Cumulative patency rates of NEG grafts were 90% at 1 year and 83% at 2 through 4 years. Similar patency rates were found in the PR vein grafts: 96% at 1 year and 88% at 2 through 4 years. In contrast, patency rates in PNR grafts with 50% or greater stenoses were only 66% at 1 year and 57% at 2 through 4 years. Log-rank tests showed a significant difference between the cumulative patency rates of NEG and PNR grafts (p < 0.002) and between PR and PNR grafts (p = 0.02). Flow velocities less than 45 cm/sec and ankle/brachial indexes did not discriminate well between grafts with or without 50% or greater stenoses or identify those grafts that subsequently occluded. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that CDS detects graft-threatening lesions, that a velocity ratio of 2.0 or greater is the most highly predictive parameter, and that revision of grafts with stenoses identified with CDS prolongs patency.

Use of warm water immersion before vein diameter measurement in a sitting position, without a tourniquet, will result in significantly larger diameter findings in normal arm veins. These diameters are likely to more closely resemble the venous diameter after distension with arterial pressure. Further studies are needed to see if warming in patients could result in increased utilization of autogenous arm vein for dialysis access and bypass.

The duration of deep venous valvular reflux was studied in 192 venous segments of the legs of 32 patients in good health. Three methods were used to elicit reflux in the supine and upright positions--Valsalva's maneuver, proximal limb compression, and release of distal limb compression. Standardized compressions were achieved with pneumatic cuffs. When this approach was used to study valve function, the time to complete closure of the valve and cessation of retrograde flow was found to be shorter than that for conventional methods of closure. The distal cuff deflation method is the only one that permits a quantitative and reproducible method to measure duration of venous reflux at all levels of the lower limb. Normal values obtained with this test are presented for the common femoral, deep femoral, and superficial femoral veins and for the popliteal and posterior tibial veins midway between knee and ankle level and the posterior tibial vein at the ankle. In the popliteal vein, median duration of reflux is 0.19 second; 95% of the values in the popliteal vein are less than 0.66 second. In distal areas, duration of reflux is short and uniform. The advantage of the cuff deflation test over the Valsalva method is that the cuff method is not hindered by the presence of ileofemoral valves. A better understanding of the relative importance of deep valve dysfunction at different levels and the expected benefit of valve repair may be obtained with this test.