No abstract

Introduction:Large-scale events may overwhelm the capacity of even the most advanced emergency medical systems. When patient volume outweighs the number of available emergency medical services (EMS) providers, a mass-casualty incident may require the aid of non-medical volunteers. These individuals may be utilized to perform field disaster triage, lessening the burden on EMS personnel.Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of triage decisions made by newly enrolled first-year medical students after receiving a brief educational intervention.Methods:A total of 315 first-year medical students from two successive classes participated in START triage training and completed a paper-based triage exercise as part of orientation. This questionnaire consisted of 15 clinical scenarios providing brief but sufficient details for prioritization. Subjects assigned each scenario a triage category of Red, Yellow, Green, or Black, based on the START protocol and were allowed four minutes to complete the exercise. Participants from the Class of 2009 were provided with printed START reference cards, while those from the Class of 2008 were not. Two test types varying in the order of patient age values were created to determine whether patient age was a factor in triage assessment.Results:The mean accuracy score of triage assignment by medical student volunteers after a brief START training session was 64.3%. The overall rate of over-triage was 17.8%, compared to an under-triage rate of 12.6%. There were no significant differences in triage accuracy between subjects with and without printed materials (63.9% vs. 64.6%,p= 0.729) or those completing the age-variant test types (64.4% vs. 64.1%,p= 0.889).Conclusions:First-year medical students who received brief START training achieved triage accuracy scores similar to those of emergency physicians, registered nurses, and paramedics in previous studies. Observed rates of underand over-triage suggest that a need exists for improving the accuracy of triage decisions made by medical and non-medical personnel. This study did not find that printed materials significantly improved triage accuracy, nor did it find that patient age affected the ability of participants to correctly assign triage categories. Future research might further evaluate disaster triage by non-medical volunteers.

Background Despite evidence to suggest significant spatial variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) rates, geographic information systems (GIS) and spatial analysis have not been widely used to understand the reasons behind this variation. This study employs spatial statistics to identify the location and extent of clusters of bystander CPR in Houston and Travis County, TX. Methods Data were extracted from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival for two U.S. sites –Austin-Travis County EMS and the Houston Fire Department – between October 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between income and racial/ethnic composition of a neighborhood and BCPR for OHCA and to adjust expected counts of BCPR for spatial cluster analysis. The spatial scan statistic was used to find the geographic extent of clusters of high and low BCPR. Results Results indicate spatial clusters of lower than expected BCPR rates in Houston. Compared to BCPR rates in the rest of the community, there was a circular area of 4.2 km radius where BCPR rates were lower than expected (RR = 0.62; p < 0.0001 and RR = 0.55; p = 0.037) which persist when adjusted for individual-level patient characteristics (RR = 0.34; p = 0.027) and neighborhood-level race (RR = 0.34; p = 0.034) and household income (RR = 0.34; p = 0.046). We also find a spatial cluster of higher than expected BCPR in Austin. Compared to the rest of the community, there was a 23.8 km radius area where BCPR rates were higher than expected (RR = 1.75; p = 0.07) which disappears after controlling for individual-level characteristics. Conclusions A geographically targeted CPR training strategy which is tailored to individual and neighborhood population characteristics may be effective in reducing existing disparities in the provision of bystander CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

The use of standard MPDS protocols can successfully identify patients who do not demonstrate high-acuity illness or injury more than 99% of the time.