Sclerostin, the protein product of the Sost gene, is a potent inhibitor of bone formation. Among bone cells, sclerostin is found nearly exclusively in the osteocytes, the cell type that historically has been implicated in sensing and initiating mechanical signaling. The recent discovery of the antagonistic effects of sclerostin on Lrp5 receptor signaling, a crucial mediator of skeletal mechanotransduction, provides a potential mechanism for the osteocytes to control mechanotransduction, by adjusting their sclerostin (Wnt inhibitory) signal output to modulate Wnt signaling in the effector cell population. We investigated the mechanoregulation of Sost and sclerostin under enhanced (ulnar loading) and reduced (hindlimb unloading) loading conditions. Sost transcripts and sclerostin protein levels were dramatically reduced by ulnar loading. Portions of the ulnar cortex receiving a greater strain stimulus were associated with a greater reduction in Sost staining intensity and sclerostin-positive osteocytes (revealed via in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively) than were lower strain portions of the tissue. Hindlimb unloading yielded a significant increase in Sost expression in the tibia. Modulation of sclerostin levels appears to be a finely tuned mechanism by which osteocytes coordinate regional and local osteogenesis in response to increased mechanical stimulation, perhaps via releasing the local inhibition of Wnt/Lrp5 signaling.Low bone mass and poor bone structure are two major risk factors for osteoporotic fracture (1, 2). A simple yet effective means to enhance bone mass and architecture is through mechanical stimulation of the resident bone cell population (3, 4). Mechanical loading (e.g. exercise) improves bone mass and strength by stimulating the addition of new bone onto surfaces experiencing high strains, whereas surfaces that experience small strains largely remain quiescent. This phenomenon occurs both across the skeleton (limb bones adapt to locomotive loading, whereas nonbearing bones (e.g. skull) do not) and within a loaded bone (tension/compression surfaces undergo bone formation, whereas surfaces straddling the neutral bending axis do not). The cellular mechanisms involved in directing new bone formation to the high strain regions of a loaded bone are unclear, but elucidation of these mechanisms would provide an attractive target for pharmaceutical intervention aimed at mimicking the adaptive response to loading (5).Despite these gaps in our understanding, significant progress has been made in delineating some of the basic mechanisms of mechanotransduction in bone, in large part because of the creation of genetically engineered mice. A key finding in this arena is the requirement for Wnt signaling through Lrp5 (the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5) in mechanically induced bone formation. We reported recently that mice engineered with a loss-of-function mutation in Lrp5 recapitulate the low bone mass phenotype observed in humans with inactivating mutations of LRP...

The human skeleton is affected by mutations in Low-density lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein 5 (LRP5). To understand how LRP5 influences bone properties, we generated mice with inducible Lrp5 mutations that cause high bone mass and low bone mass phenotypes in humans. We conditionally-induced Lrp5 mutations in osteocytes and found that bone properties in these mice were comparable to bone properties in mice with inherited mutations. We also conditionally-induced an Lrp5 mutation in cells that contribute to the appendicular skeleton, and not to the axial skeleton, and we observed bone properties were altered in the limbs, and not in the spine. These data indicate that Lrp5 signaling functions locally and suggest increasing LRP5 signaling in mature bone cells as a strategy to treat human low bone mass disorders, such as osteoporosis.

Mutations among genes that participate in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway can lead to drastically different skeletal phenotypes, ranging from severe osteoporosis to severe osteosclerosis. Many high-bone-mass (HBM) causing mutations that occur in the LRP5 gene appear to impart the HBM phenotype, in part, by increasing resistance to soluble Wnt signaling inhibitors, including sclerostin. Sost loss-of-function mutant mice (Sost knock-out) and Lrp5 gain-of-function mutant mice (Lrp5 HBM knock-in) have high bone mass. These mutants potentially would be predicted to be phenocopies of one another, because in both cases, the sclerostin–Lrp5 interaction is disrupted. We measured bone mass, size, geometry, architecture, and strength in bones from three different genetic mouse models (Sost knock-out, Lrp5 A214V knock-in, and Lrp5 G171V knock-in) of HBM. We found that all three mouse lines had significantly elevated bone mass in the appendicular skeleton and in the cranium. Sost mutants and Lrp5 A214V mutants were statistically indistinguishable from one another in most endpoints, whereas both were largely different from the Lrp5 G171V mutants. Lrp5 G171V mutants preferentially added bone endocortically, whereas Lrp5 A214V and Sost mutants preferentially added bone periosteally. Cranial thickness and cranial nerve openings were similarly altered in all three HBM models. We also assessed serum serotonin levels as a possible mechanism accounting for the observed changes in bone mass, but no differences in serum serotonin were found in any of the three HBM mouse lines. The skeletal dissimilarities of the Lrp5 G171V mutant to the other mutants suggests that other, non-sclerostin-associated mechanisms might account for the changes in bone mass resulting from this mutation.

Mechanotransduction in bone requires components of the Wnt signaling pathway to produce structurally adapted bone elements. In particular, the Wnt co-receptor LDL-receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) appears to be a crucial protein in the mechanotransduction cascades that translate physical tissue deformation into new bone formation. Recently discovered missense mutations in LRP5 are associated with high bone mass (HBM), and the altered function of these proteins provide insight into LRP5 function in many skeletal processes, including mechanotransduction. We further investigated the role of LRP5 in bone cell mechanotransduction by applying mechanical stimulation in vivo to two different mutant mouse lines, which harbor HBM-causing missense mutations in Lrp5. Axial tibia loading was applied to mature male Lrp5 G171V and Lrp5 A214V knock-in mice, and to their wild type controls. Fluorochrome labeling revealed that 3 days of loading resulted in a significantly enhanced periosteal response in the A214V knock in mice, whereas the G171V mice exhibited a lowered osteogenic threshold on the endocortical surface. In summary, our data further highlight the importance of Lrp5 in bone cell mechanotransduction, and indicate that the HBM-causing mutations in Lrp5 can alter the anabolic response to mechanical stimulation in favor of increased bone gain.