A recent study of phosphate monoesters that broke down exclusively through C-O bond cleavage and whose reactivity was unaffected by protonation of the nonbridging oxygens (Byczynski et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12541) raised several questions about the reactivity of phosphate monoesters, R-O-P(i). Potential catalytic strategies, particularly with regard to selectively promoting C-O or O-P bond cleavage, were investigated computationally through simple alkyl and aryl phosphate monoesters. Both C-O and O-P bonds lengthened upon protonating the bridging oxygen, R-O(H(+))-P(i), and heterolytic bond dissociation energies, DeltaH(C)(-)(O) and DeltaH(O)(-)(P), decreased. Which bond will break depends on the protonation state of the phosphoryl moiety, P(i), and the identity of the organosubstituent, R. Protonating the bridging oxygen when the nonbridging oxygens were already protonated favored C-O cleavage, while protonating the bridging oxygen of the dianion form, R-O-PO(3)(2)(-), favored O-P cleavage. Alkyl R groups capable of forming stable cations were more prone to C-O bond cleavage, with tBu > iPr > F(2)iPr > Me. The lack of effect on the C-O cleavage rate from protonating nonbridging oxygens could arise from two precisely offsetting effects: Protonating nonbridging oxygens lengthens the C-O bond, making it more reactive, but also decreases the bridging oxygen proton affinity, making it less likely to be protonated and, therefore, less reactive. The lack of effect could also arise without bridging oxygen protonation if the ratio of rate constants with different protonation states precisely matched the ratio of acidity constants, K(a). Calculations used hybrid density functional theory (B3PW91/6-31++G) methods with a conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM) of solvation. Calculations on Me-phosphate using MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ and PBE0/aug-cc-pVDZ levels of theory, and variations on the solvation model, confirmed the reproducibility with different computational models.
Intramolecular rearrangements of methoxysiloxycarbene (CH3OCOSiH3) have been investigated by means of ab initio molecular orbital theory and hybrid density functional theory calculations. Particular attention was paid to 1,2-silyl migration from oxygen to the carbene carbon, and to the analogous 1,2-methyl migration for comparison. A combination of frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory, natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis, and the theory of atoms in molecules (AIM) were used to shed light on the mechanistic details of these rearrangements. The present analyses clearly indicate that 1,2-silyl migration involves nucleophilic attack by the carbene lone pair at silicon, whereas 1,2-methyl migration seems to involve an anion-like shift of the methyl group from oxygen to the "vacant" carbene p-orbital. Finally, based on the computed relative Gibbs free energy barriers, it is apparent that 1,2-silyl migration is much more favorable than 1,2-methyl migration, in keeping with experimental observations.Key words: carbenes, oxycarbenes, intramolecular rearrangements, 1,2-migrations, quantum chemistry, theory of atoms in molecules, natural bond orbital analysis
[reaction: see text] Thermolysis of 2-methoxy-2-triphenylsiloxy-5,5-dimethyl-Delta(3)-1,3, 4-oxadiazoline affords methyl triphenylsilylformate and methyl triphenylsilyl ether via methoxytriphenylsiloxycarbene. Kinetics show that the carbene undergoes reversible 1,2-triphenylsilyl migration (Brook rearrangement) as well as irreversible decarbonylation. Computed transition states and activation energies (B3LYP/6-31+G) suggest that the migration of the silyl group from oxygen to carbon occurs through an "in plane" transition state with the carbene lone pair forming a new bond to silicon. Decarbonylation involves a four-membered ring, achieved by nucleophilic attack of the oxygen atom of the methoxy group at silicon.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.