As Robert Darnton sees it, we are living amidst the most recent of "four fundamental changes in information technology" that have patterned human history. 1 Coming just before our age of digital transition, he claims, was the Victorian epoch, which was transformed by a dramatic expansion of texts and readers. Darnton's sketch is at once debatable and elegant, offering an attractive homology to nineteenth-century scholars who would connect these moments of change, past and present. 2 In the forms of digitized historical resources and computational research methods, the connections between media shifts then and now can not only be theorized but also operationalized, with the nineteenth century's prolific sources serving as the materials for twenty-first century digital humanities research. This essay results from just such an initiative-a content-mining project focused on the digital collection British Nineteenth-Century Newspapers from the commercial publisher Gale Cengage. Yet my goal is not to explain the contemporary challenges of computational approaches, the scale of digital materials, or a culture of proliferating information that connects us to the Victorians. Instead, this essay calls attention to the gaps in that story: the largely hidden history of how Victorian data gets to now. It argues that our justifiable enthusiasm for linking past and present has effectively erased the interval between-the twentieth-century transmission histories that established the parameters for scholarly resources in digital forms. New media is always in the process of constituting itself as new, erasing the legacies of its entanglements and the continuous work of its propagation. 3 This essay follows the lead of several scholars in media studies and critical bibliography to outline-and then pursue-a method for investigating these material histories, an "archaeology" of data, to better grasp the historiography of our research objects, which are expressed, for the moment, in digital form. Such an approach enables us not only to understand the mediated
The nineteenth-century British periodical press took textual production to a scale that, for many commentators then and now, summoned the sublime. It was a "flood" which was "too vast to be dealt with as a whole, " in the words of the British Quarterly Review in 1859. It remained "a vast wilderness … its extent unknown, its ramifications unfathomed" for subsequent researchers, according to Michael Wolff in a 1971 issue of the Victorian Periodicals Newsletter. 1 By the numbers for newspapers alone, stamped titles increased almost five-fold from 550 in 1846 to 2,440 in 1906. 2 Simon Eliot estimates the number of copies those
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.