This study presents a double dissociation between the dentate gyrus (DG) and CA1. Rats with either DG or CA1 lesions were tested on tasks requiring either spatial or spatial temporal order pattern separation. To assess spatial pattern separation, rats were trained to displace an object which covered a baited food-well. The rats were then allowed to choose between two identical objects: one covered the same well as the sample phase object (correct choice), and a second object covered a different unbaited well (incorrect choice). Spatial separations of 15-105 cm were used to separate the correct object from the incorrect object. To assess spatial temporal order pattern separation, rats were allowed to visit each arm of a radial eight-arm maze once in a randomly determined sequence. The rats were then presented with two arms and were required to choose the arm which occurred earliest in the sequence. The choice arms varied according to temporal separation (0, 2, 4, or 6) or the number of arms that occurred between the two choice arms in the sample phase sequence. On each task, once a preoperative criterion was reached, each rat was given either a DG, CA1, or control lesion and then retested. The results demonstrated that DG lesions resulted in a deficit on the spatial task but not the temporal task. In contrast, CA1 lesions resulted in a deficit on the temporal task but not the spatial task. Results suggest that the DG supports spatial pattern separation, whereas CA1 supports temporal pattern separation.
The purpose of this review is to determine whether specific subregions (dentate gyrus [DG], CA3, and CA1) of the hippocampus provide unique contributions to specific processes associated with intrinsic information processing exemplified by novelty detection, encoding, pattern separation, pattern association, pattern completion, retrieval, short-term memory and intermediate-term memory. Based on anatomical neural network organization, electrophysiology of cellular activity, lesions, early gene activation, and computational modeling, it can be shown that there exists extensive cooperation among the three subregions of the hippocampus, but there also exists reliable specificity of function for each of the subregions of the hippocampus. The primary process supported by the DG subregion of the hippocampus can be characterized by orthogonalization of sensory inputs to create a metric spatial representation. Furthermore the DG participates in conjunction with CA3 in supporting spatial pattern separation. The CA3 subregion of the hippocampus supports processes associated with spatial pattern association, spatial pattern completion, novelty detection, and short-term memory. The CA1 subregion of the hippocampus supports processes associated with temporal pattern association, temporal pattern completion, and intermediate-term memory. Furthermore, the CA3 in conjunction with CA1 supports temporal pattern separation. All the above-mentioned processes are assumed to reflect intrinsic processing of information within the hippocampus. The diversity of functions associated with the different subregions of the hippocampus suggests that one should not treat the hippocampus as a single entity, but rather that one should concentrate on elucidating further the functions of both dorsal and ventral subregions of the hippocampus and pathways that directly connect each of the subregions as well as their connections with the entorhinal cortex.
Young and nondemented older adults were tested on a continuous recognition memory task requiring visual pattern separation. During the task, some objects were repeated across trials and some objects, referred to as lures, were presented that were similar to previously presented objects. The lures resulted in increased interference and an increased need for pattern separation. For each object, the participant was asked to indicate whether (1) this was the first time the object was seen (new), (2) the object was seen previously (old), or (3) the object was similar to a previous object (similar). Older adults were able to correctly identify objects as old or new as well as young adults; however, older adults were impaired when identifying lures as similar. Therefore, pattern separation may be less efficient in older adults resulting in poorer recognition memory performance when interference is increased.A primary region of the brain affected by normal aging is the hippocampus in humans (Good et al. 2001;Allen et al. 2005;Driscoll and Sutherland 2005;Raz et al. 2005;Walhovd et al. 2005) and animal models (Rosenzweig and Barnes 2003;Driscoll et al. 2006). However, the subregions of the hippocampus may be differentially affected by normal aging (Small et al. 2002(Small et al. , 2004. The dentate gyrus (DG) subregion may be particularly susceptible to age-related changes in both humans (Small et al. 2002) and animal models (Small et al. 2004;Patrylo and Williamson 2007), whereas aging may have less of an impact on pyramidal cells in the CA subregions (Small et al. 2002(Small et al. , 2004. In contrast, the CA subregions of the hippocampus may be more vulnerable to pathological aging associated with Alzheimer's disease (Braak and Braak 1996;Price et al. 2001;West et al. 2001). Therefore, tasks sensitive to dysfunction in particular subregions of the hippocampus may help to differentiate cognitive impairment associated with normal aging from pathological changes associated with Alzheimer's disease. Although hippocampal-dependent tasks are highly sensitive to age-related changes in the brain (for review, see Rosenzweig and Barnes 2003), behavioral studies in humans have not examined the performance of nondemented older adults on tasks shown to be particularly sensitive to DG function. As described in detail below, a key function of the DG may be to support pattern separation. Age-related changes in the DG may impair the ability to reduce similarity among new input patterns, resulting in decreased pattern separation (Wilson et al. 2006). Therefore, decreased efficiency in pattern separation may be a critical, but relatively unexamined, processing deficit in nondemented older humans.Pattern separation is described as a mechanism for separating partially overlapping patterns of activation so that one pattern may be retrieved as separate from other patterns (Gilbert et al. 2001;Gilbert and Kesner 2006;Kirwan and Stark 2007). The operation of a pattern separation mechanism is critical for reducing potential interference among ...
Memory for the temporal order of a sequence of odors was assessed in rats. A sequence of 5 odors mixed in sand was presented in digging cups, 1 at a time, to each rat in a sequence that varied on each trial. A reward was buried in each cup. After the 5th odor, 2 of the previous 5 odors were presented simultaneously; to receive a reward, the rat had to choose the odor that occurred earliest in the sequence. Temporal separations of 1, 2, or 3 represented the number of odors that occurred between the 2 odors in the sequence. Once a preoperative criterion was reached, each rat received a hippocampal (HIP) or cortical control lesion and was retested on the task. On postoperative trials, the HIP group was impaired relative to controls. However, the HIP group could discriminate between the odors. The data suggest that the hippocampus is involved in separating sensory events in time so that I event can be remembered separately from another event.
A paradigm based on measuring short-term memory for spatial location information as a function of spatial similarity between distal cues was developed to examine the role of pattern separation in the modulation of short-term memory for spatial information. A delayed-match-to-sample for spatial location task using a dryland version of the Morris water maze was used to assess spatial pattern separation in male Long-Evans rats. In the sample phase, animals were trained to displace an object that covered a baited food well in one of 15 spatial locations along a row of food wells perpendicular to a start box. In the ensuing choice phase, the animal was allowed to choose between two objects identical to the sample phase object. One covered the same baited food well as did the object in the study phase (correct choice), and another foil object (incorrect choice) covered a different unbaited food well along the row of wells. Five spatial separations were randomly used to separate the correct object from the foil object. After reaching a criterion before the operation, animals were given either hippocampal or cortical control lesions. In trials after the operation, control animals matched their performance before the operation across all spatial separations. In contrast, hippocampal-lesioned animals displayed impairments across all spatial separations with the exception of the longest (105 cm) spatial separation. The results suggest that the hippocampus may serve to separate incoming spatial information by temporarily storing one place separate from another. It is proposed that hippocampal lesions decrease efficiency in pattern separation, resulting in impairments in trials with increased spatial similarity among working-memory representations.
Computational models and electrophysiological data suggest that the CA3 subregion of the hippocampus supports the formation of arbitrary associations; however, no behavioral studies have been conducted to test this hypothesis. Rats with neurotoxin-induced lesions of dorsal dentate gyrus (DG), CA3, or CA1 were tested on object-place and odor-place paired-associate tasks to test whether the mechanism that supports paired-associate learning is localized to the CA3 subregion of the dorsal hippocampus or whether all hippocampal subregions contribute to paired-associate learning. The data indicate that rats with DG or CA1 lesions learned the tasks as well as controls; however, CA3-lesioned rats were impaired in learning the tasks. Thus, the CA3 subregion of the dorsal hippocampus contains a mechanism to support paired-associate learning.
This experiment was designed to determine whether adding a temporal component to an object-odor association task would recruit the hippocampus. The rats were given CA1, CA3, or control lesions prior to learning the object-trace-odor task. Rats were presented with an object for 10 s, after which the object was removed, followed by a 10-s trace period, followed by the presentation of an odor 50 cm away. If the odor and the object were paired, rats were to dig in the odor cup for a reward. If unpaired, rats were to refrain from digging. Rats that had CA1 lesions were unable to make the association, whereas rats that had CA3 lesions performed as well as controls. These results support the idea that the hippocampus is involved in forming arbitrary associations that do not necessarily involve space as long as they involve a temporal component.
The ability of rats with control or hippocampal lesions to learn an object-place, odor-place, or object-odor paired-associate task was assessed in a cheeseboard maze apparatus. The data indicate that rats with hippocampal lesions were significantly impaired, compared with controls, in learning both the object-place and the odor-place paired-associate tasks. However, rats with hippocampal lesions learned the object-odor paired-associate task as readily as did controls. The data suggest that the rodent hippocampus is involved in paired-associate learning when a stimulus must be associated with a spatial location. However, the hippocampus is not involved in paired-associate learning when the association does not involve a spatial component.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.